One of
the predicted consequences of climate change is a shift in body mass distributions within animal populations.
«Studies that aim to
predict the consequences of climate change on insect populations should consider additional factors that may ultimately limit growth and survival, such as the risk of being eaten by a predator,» Culler says.
Not exact matches
Scientists discover an important clue in
predicting future
consequences of climate change: the mechanism that moves ice streams
Predicting how species will respond to
climate change is a critical part
of efforts to prevent widespread
climate - driven extinction, or to
predict its
consequences for ecosystems.
Farmers, working with scientists, should be able to use this information to
predict the
consequences of global
climate change on agricultural yield.
But mentioning that in the context
of Hurricane Sandy is an attempt (or at least has the effect) to minimize the concern about the documented
changes to the
climate we have already made and the
predicted catastrophic
consequences of staying on the fossil emissions path we are on.
What geologists can't do is
predict current and future
consequences of global warming and
climate changes through our expert knowledge
of the Paleozoic and Mesozoic eras.
Study
of Earth's
climate extremes through history — when
climate was extremely cold or hot or
changed quickly — may lead to improved
climate models that could enable scientists to
predict the magnitude and
consequences of climate change.
Time is not on our side and we are going to see the
consequences of climate change faster than
predicted by scientists at the cost
of mankind.
Extreme weather events are known to have serious
consequences for human health and are
predicted to increase in frequency as a result
of climate change.
That is why I am sceptic
of catastrophic
consequences of predicted climate change as a
consequence of man's actions.
My position is the following: 1) the extent
of past human interference with global
climate is likely somewhat exaggerated, 2) the dangers
of future human - induced
climate change are greatly exaggerated (for example, I heard Ira Flatow a couple
of weeks ago talking about the East coast being under water in 50 years — which is complete piffle), 3) the numerical global
climate do a poor job
of past reconstruction and are unlikely to be very reliable in
predicting the
consequences of future human activity.
The Arctic
climate is
changing so quickly that science can barely keep track
of what is happening and
predict the global
consequences, the UN says.
However, GCMs are not proof
of climate theory, but they are the best we have for
predicting what the
consequences of various policy options will be - far ahead
of examining entrails or assuming nothing will
change.
An unintended
consequence of this strategy is that there has been very little left over for true
climate modeling innovations and fundamental research into
climate dynamics and theory — such research would not only support amelioration
of deficiencies and failures in the current
climate modeling systems, but would also lay the foundations for disruptive advances in our understanding
of the
climate system and our ability to
predict emergent phenomena such as abrupt
climate change.
Not only do the economic
climate models need to
predict policy shifts, population growth, and the pace and type
of climate changes to come — more droughts, more severe storms, higher temperatures in some places and lower in others, etc. — but they also try to quantify things such as agricultural and forestry losses, damage from catastrophic storms, utility costs, savings from efficiency improvements, water shortages, and sometimes even the economic
consequences of refugee flows.
These are just some
of the dire
consequences that Chinese scientists
predict for their country this century if current
climate change is not addressed.
These cloud
changes are,
of course, hardly without
consequence — the growth
of so - called dry zones or drylands, as the planet warms, has been long
predicted and indeed, observed by
climate scientists.