The popular virtual keyboard SwiftKey had recently fixed their errors related to syncing and
prediction problems just a few months back.
Not exact matches
But don't go sighing with relief
just yet: the main
problem with this
prediction may be the timing.
«The
problem is that the Standard Model
predictions are
just too small to explain what goes on in the universe,» said Shears of the University of Liverpool.
Look, I get that you don't like my
prediction but SEGA has a long history of making 3 - d aonic games that range from alright to downright horrible and its not
just because of technical
problems.
The only
problem with all the
predictions about the level of the World Ocean rising is that, the World Ocean is refusing to rise up in support of the
predictions, the other
problem is that ice is frozen fresh water and frozen fresh water only covers about 5 % of this planet above sea level and frozen water under the level of the World Ocean does not count as the World Ocean will fall a small amount if that ice melts, so if the ice there is enough to get the World Ocean to rise and significant amount then it must be piled up very high, I cubic kilometer of water as ice, should it melt, would make 1000 square kilometers rise by one meter, so when you use this simple math then somewhere on the planet, above the level of the sea, then there must be over 500,000 cubic kilometers of ice, piled up and
just waiting to melt, strange that no one can find that amount of ice, all these morons who talk about the rise of the World Ocean in tens of meters, this includes you Peter Garrett or Mr. 7 Meters, the ice does not exist to allow this amount of rise in the World Ocean, it is
just not there.
It is a shame they did not observe their failure and begin to wonder whether the same
problem that eludes
prediction of ENSO might
just prevent them from predicting climate at all.
For the
problem where there is strong integral forcing over the period of say a half century (such as greenhouse gas forcing), this is more predictable, but trying to tie down a
prediction on the timescale of a decade
just doesn't work owing to the temporal - spatio chaos that is present.
It should be emphasized that solving (the solvable)
problems of climate
prediction (or,
just as important, making a realistic assessment of the ultimate limits to climate
prediction set by the inherent uncertainties within the system) requires the deployment and long - term maintenance of massively expensive observational satellite and oceanographic programs.
The
problem with any of this is that somethings are
just inherently unpredictable — technology development, societal development, wars, etc. and so you are never going to have «
predictions» of human societal development decades into the future.
The
problem is not
just one of climate variability.The more you read the originals the more the
prediction appears to fall apart.