I do want to say
about the soaking up process: It's somewhat remarkable that this 50 percent soaking up that has happened, it has been remarkably constant over
about since we have had our
measurements through the 40 years, and that is hopeful in the sense that it allows us to make some fairly good
predictions into the
future.
assuming what you say
about skeptics changing topic as you describe is accurate, and at this point I do we are talking
about data that is less than 200 years old, out of which extraordinary claims are made as to how that data relates to distant past and
future trends tough sell assuming that all adjustments to the data are scientifically sound, It is very difficult for me to believe that
measurements that have gone through so many iterations can be trusted to.0 and.00 in most other sciences, I doubt they would tough sell (the photo of the thermometer is downright funny) in terms of goal post moving I observe predicted heat being re-branded as «missing» a
prediction of no snow re-branded as more snow a warming world re-branded to a «warm, cold, we don't know what to expect» world topped off with suggestions that one who thinks the above has some sort of psychological disorder extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence especially when you are teaching children that their world is endangered