Since last June, the media climate has been brutally hostile towards leaving: we've heard endless confident
predictions of economic damage; warnings about the prospect of the break - up of the UK; and even the possibility of a return to confrontation in Northern Ireland.
Not exact matches
By far the most frequent arguments made in opposition to climate change policies are
economic predictions of various kinds such as claims that proposed climate change legislation will destroy jobs, reduce GDP,
damage US businesses such as the coal and petroleum industries, or increase the cost
of fuel.
A rational public and private sector response to the threat
of storm
damage in a changing climate must therefore acknowledge scientific uncertainties that are likely to persist beyond the time at which decisions will need to be made, focus more on the risks and benefits
of planning for the worst case scenarios, and recognize that the combination
of societal trends and the most confident aspects
of climate change
predictions makes future
economic impacts substantially more likely than does either one alone.
Writing as background for his work, Seo states that alarming
predictions of more intense hurricanes because
of climate change «are
of great concern,» yet he says there have been «few TC [tropical cyclone] studies in the Southern Hemisphere,» adding that there has been «no
economic assessment
of damages in the past.»