Predictions of future sea - level rise and reduction in volume of ice sheets are consistent with what the evidence indicates during the Last Interglacial.
In an upcoming post, we shall look at
predictions of future sea level rise.
If they do so by simulating near - average conditions most of the time, they are getting the right answer for the wrong reason, and
their predictions of future sea ice decline should be discounted.
This has several implications for
predictions of future sea ice decline.
Since current ice melt data could indicate variable climate trends and aren't necessarily part of an accelerating trend, the study warned that
predictions of future sea - level rise should not be based on measurements of glacial loss» Daily Mail.
Not exact matches
This gives confidence in the
predictions of the current generation
of ice - sheet models which are used to forecast
future ice loss from Antarctica and resulting
sea - level rise.»
The next step is to use estimates
of future sea ice loss to make
predictions of how further melting could influence summer rainfall in Europe in the years to come.
Woodworth couldn't find any evidence to support the proposed
sea level fall posited by Mörner and concludes that the IPCC's
prediction remains the most reliable scenario for to the
future of the Maldives.
At the same time policymakers need to know the
future of sea - level rise, and they need as robust a
prediction as we can give,» said Michael Oppenheimer, Princeton's Albert G. Milbank Professor
of Geosciences and International Affairs and the Princeton Environmental Institute and first author
of the paper.
Kuhn, from Germany's Alfred Wegener Institute, added, «This gives confidence in the
predictions of the current generation
of ice sheet models which are used to forecast
future ice loss from Antarctica and resulting
sea - level rise.»
Oppenheimer and his co-authors use a technique known as «structured expert judgment» to put an actual value on the uncertainty that scientists studying climate change have about a particular model's
prediction of future events such as
sea - level rise.
Frightening thought — if and only if the AGW centric
prediction of future climate is either not completely correct, or out right wrong, consider extreme scenarios which would result in a drastically (and painfully) different outcome than the prophecied
sea level rise / climatic tropical expansion / northerly movement
of species model.
pg xiii This Policymakers Summary aims to bring out those elements
of the main report which have the greatest relevance to policy formulation, in answering the following questions • What factors determine global climate 7 • What are the greenhouse gases, and how and why are they increasing 9 • Which gases are the most important 9 • How much do we expect the climate to change 9 • How much confidence do we have in our
predictions 9 • Will the climate
of the
future be very different 9 • Have human activities already begun to change global climate 9 How much will
sea level rise 9 • What will be the effects on ecosystems 9 • What should be done to reduce uncertainties, and how long will this take 9 This report is intended to respond to the practical needs
of the policymaker.
Canadian Ice Service, 4.7, Multiple Methods As with CIS contributions in June 2009, 2010, and 2011, the 2012 forecast was derived using a combination
of three methods: 1) a qualitative heuristic method based on observed end -
of - winter arctic ice thicknesses and extents, as well as an examination
of Surface Air Temperature (SAT),
Sea Level Pressure (SLP) and vector wind anomaly patterns and trends; 2) an experimental Optimal Filtering Based (OFB) Model, which uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate NSIDC's September Arctic Ice Extent time series into the future; and 3) an experimental Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and sea ice predicto
Sea Level Pressure (SLP) and vector wind anomaly patterns and trends; 2) an experimental Optimal Filtering Based (OFB) Model, which uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate NSIDC's September Arctic Ice Extent time series into the
future; and 3) an experimental Multiple Linear Regression (MLR)
prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and
sea ice predicto
sea ice predictors.
Canadian Ice Service, 4.7 (+ / - 0.2), Heuristic / Statistical (same as June) The 2015 forecast was derived by considering a combination
of methods: 1) a qualitative heuristic method based on observed end -
of - winter Arctic ice thickness extents, as well as winter Surface Air Temperature,
Sea Level Pressure and vector wind anomaly patterns and trends; 2) a simple statistical method, Optimal Filtering Based Model (OFBM), that uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate the September sea ice extent timeseries into the future and 3) a Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and sea ice predicto
Sea Level Pressure and vector wind anomaly patterns and trends; 2) a simple statistical method, Optimal Filtering Based Model (OFBM), that uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate the September
sea ice extent timeseries into the future and 3) a Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and sea ice predicto
sea ice extent timeseries into the
future and 3) a Multiple Linear Regression (MLR)
prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and
sea ice predicto
sea ice predictors.
Levine, R.C., Turner, A.G., Marathayil, D. and Martin, G.M. (accepted Dec 2012), The role
of northern Arabian
Sea surface temperature biases in CMIP5 model simulations and
future predictions of Indian summer monsoon rainfall, in press, Climate Dynamics., DOI 10.1007 / s00382 -012-1656-x link
Regarding (3), I've never actually encountered a CAGW movement supporter who actually seemed personally scared
of the climate
predictions, like personally moving away from the coast specifically because
of believed
future sea level rise or moving further north for that reason.
Yet some kind
of climate model is indispensable to make
future predictions of the climate system and IPCC has identified several reasons for respect in the climate models including the fact that models are getting better in predicting what monitoring evidence is actually observing around the world in regard to temperature, ice and snow cover, droughts and floods, and
sea level rise among other things.
Canadian Ice Service; 5.0; Statistical As with Canadian Ice Service (CIS) contributions in June 2009 and June 2010, the 2011 forecast was derived using a combination
of three methods: 1) a qualitative heuristic method based on observed end -
of - winter Arctic Multi-Year Ice (MYI) extents, as well as an examination
of Surface Air Temperature (SAT),
Sea Level Pressure (SLP) and vector wind anomaly patterns and trends; 2) an experimental Optimal Filtering Based (OFB) Model which uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate NSIDC's September Arctic Ice Extent time series into the future; and 3) an experimental Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere, and sea ice predicto
Sea Level Pressure (SLP) and vector wind anomaly patterns and trends; 2) an experimental Optimal Filtering Based (OFB) Model which uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate NSIDC's September Arctic Ice Extent time series into the
future; and 3) an experimental Multiple Linear Regression (MLR)
prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere, and
sea ice predicto
sea ice predictors.
However, initialized
prediction ensembles using CESM can skillfully predict low - frequency modulations in the decadal trends
of Arctic
sea ice, and the significant skill scores for Atlantic sector
sea ice extent, in particular, suggest that CESM DP
future forecasts merit serious consideration.
These new
sea ice proxy records are needed (1) to fully prove the scenarios
of a succession from an extended ice shelf to polynya / open - water conditions (cf., Fig. 6), (2) to reconstruct in more detail the changes in
sea ice cover for early, middle and late LIG intervals characterized by very different external forcings and related internal feedback mechanisms, and (3) to allow a more fundamental proxy data / modeling comparison that results in model improvements and better reproduction
of the LIG climatic evolution and
prediction of future climatic scenarios20, 21,22,23, 64.
Canadian Ice Service, 4.7 (± 0.2), Heuristic / Statistical (same as June) The 2015 forecast was derived by considering a combination
of methods: 1) a qualitative heuristic method based on observed end -
of - winter Arctic ice thickness extents, as well as winter Surface Air Temperature,
Sea Level Pressure and vector wind anomaly patterns and trends; 2) a simple statistical method, Optimal Filtering Based Model (OFBM), that uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate the September sea ice extent timeseries into the future and 3) a Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and sea ice predicto
Sea Level Pressure and vector wind anomaly patterns and trends; 2) a simple statistical method, Optimal Filtering Based Model (OFBM), that uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate the September
sea ice extent timeseries into the future and 3) a Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and sea ice predicto
sea ice extent timeseries into the
future and 3) a Multiple Linear Regression (MLR)
prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and
sea ice predicto
sea ice predictors.
All such projections involve assumptions about the
future that can not be tested, so the authors spread their bets: they considered a range
of scenarios involving crude population growth, levels
of economic growth with time, and a series
of predictions of sea level rise, as icecaps and glaciers melt, and as the oceans warm and expand according to predictable physical laws.
As with previous CIS contributions, the 2016 forecast was derived by considering a combination
of methods: 1) a qualitative heuristic method based on observed end -
of - winter Arctic ice thickness / extent, as well as winter surface air temperature, spring ice conditions and the summer temperature forecast; 2) a simple statistical method, Optimal Filtering Based Model (OFBM), that uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate the September
sea ice extent time - series into the
future and 3) a Multiple Linear Regression (MLR)
prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and
sea ice predictors.
The Mercer (1978) ``... a threat
of disaster» paper introduced above was fraught with presumptions, guesswork, and spectacularly wrong
predictions about the connections between fossil fuel consumption by humans and
future carbon dioxide (CO2) parts per million (ppm) concentrations, the melting
of polar ice sheets, and an impeding
sea level rise disaster.
That paper, which was not peer - reviewed, argued that because polar bear numbers have remained relatively stable despite faster - than - expected
sea ice loss over the past decade, scientists»
predictions of future population declines are flawed.
Dr. Alley teaches, and conducts research on the climatic records, flow behavior, and sedimentary deposits
of large ice sheets, to aid in
prediction of future changes in climate and
sea level.
Specifically, key parameters
of the Human System, such as fertility, health, migration, economic inequality, unemployment, GDP per capita, resource use per capita, and emissions per capita, must depend on the dynamic variables
of the Human — Earth coupled system.26 Not including these feedbacks would be like trying to make El Niño
predictions using dynamic atmospheric models but with
sea surface temperatures as an external input based on
future projections independently produced (e.g., by the UN) without feedbacks.
13) The inability
of climate models to adequately reproduce the recent states and trends
of Arctic
sea ice diminishes confidence in their accuracy for making
future climate
predictions.
Why
Seas Are Rising Ahead
of Predictions: Estimates
of Rate
of Future Sea - Level Rise May Be Too Low http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/11/121101153549.htm
Retrospective analysis and
future prediction of the arctic
sea ice system (Jinlun Zhang, D. Andrew Rothrock, and Michael Steele; Applied Physics Laboratory) http://psc.apl.washington.edu/zhang/IDAO/index.html
Indeed, working with
predictions for
future temperature increases and glacier melt rates generated by ten separate global climate models — all
of which are also used by the Intergovernmental Panel
of Climate Change - the team have concluded that these smaller ice sources will contribute around 12 centimetres to world
sea - level increases over the remainder
of the century, with this likely to have catastrophic consequences for numerous natural habitats as well as for hundreds
of thousands
of people.