Sentences with phrase «predictive coding»

Within the last two years, federal and state courts around the country have issued decisions endorsing the use of predictive coding and accepting it as the norm.

Great starting point for lawyers who are hesitant to embrace the idea of using predictive coding!

Over the past six months, we've seen a dramatic uptake in predictive coding in this region.

As predictive coding and analytics play a bigger role in e-discovery, those with legal, IT and mathematical skills will be in great demand.

From discussions on predictive coding workflow, to collaboration and streamlined processes, respondents explicitly asserted the need for high - quality third party professionals.

However, predictive coding for defense teams is like a hack saw compared to the precise cutting - edge high technologies our firm offers to plaintiffs.

The survey also revealed that although there is widespread familiarity with predictive coding technology, there are a variety of reasons why it has not been widely adopted.

But with predictive coding comes a host of questions.

Those decisions are fed into predictive coding software and after a number of iterations the software is able to determine the responsiveness level of the remaining documents.

We've tried to explain how predictive coding works at a very basic level, but it's important to recognize that all products include different capabilities that impact the process.

As you can probably already tell there is a fair amount of technological sophistication (and some dreaded math) underlying how predictive coding works.

Can you tell our listeners what is technology assisted review and how is it different from predictive coding or computer assisted coding?

And what about predictive coding in e - discovery?

You may have heard of new technology called predictive coding or technology - assisted review.

Machine learning applications like predictive coding have been around for years and are well established.

Most predictive coding systems require human reviewers to train and tune them.

We discussed the changing nature of data, the importance of workflow processes, and the philosophical differences challenging predictive coding adoption.

Firstly, what does predictive coding do differently than keyword searching?

By utilizing predictive coding technology, law firms can prioritize documents by subject matter and responsiveness, and decrease the amount of time reviewers spend coding documents from scratch.

Now that you've had primer on review, our next section looks specifically at predictive coding, a technology - driven process that many people see as the future of e-discovery review.

In - house counsel will begin conducting more predictive coding pilots with experienced service providers.

When predictive coding first emerged there was a great deal of anticipation among legal practitioners on how courts would respond.

About 3 - 4 years ago, predictive coding engines as well as sampling functions were introduced to the platforms.

He then explains predictive coding in its simplicity: to feed a computer program information based on discovery attorneys have already done until the computer can accurately predict which information is important.

In turn, predictive coding provides cost savings to clients.

2015 will see more predictive coding cases decided, and more definition will come, especially around the area of attorney - client privilege.

In pretty much all matters it's worth doing some testing to see if predictive coding will be helpful.

Once they recognize this, they become much more open to seeing the potential benefits predictive coding can offer.

It argued that allowing predictive coding at this stage would further complicate the litigation and lead to numerous satellite disputes.

The availability of predictive coding also reduces the number of attorneys needed to conduct document review.

Like any technology, predictive coding offers pros and cons.

But whether predictive coding can make common, ordinary size litigation affordable to a majority of the population is yet to be proved.

Attorneys will still need to review the relevant documents produced through predictive coding, but the quantity of documents for review can be much more manageable.

Also, the most strategic law firms — the ones that view predictive coding as a key tool in helping them add value and better serve clients — are driving adoption among competing firms.

As stated above, small cases do not make good predictive coding candidates.

Seven out of 10 respondents said predictive coding technology will go mainstream if it becomes easier to use, more transparent, and less expensive.

Additionally, 60 % of the respondents said that they would prefer to buy predictive coding as a service, versus 33 % preferring to buy it as a software.

Even predictive coding — a relative newcomer compared to, say, using online data hosting platforms or keyword search terms — has been used for a number of years now.

They have seen only a few predictive coding cases.

Wouldn't it would pay for them to «run the tests» to prove predictive coding works.

I am unaware of any published study that finds predictive coding is unreliable or that finds that human reviewers are reliable.

It is the first technology - assisted review software to offer real - time predictive coding, showing the impact each training document has on relevance scores immediately when it is reviewed.

Yet in conversation corporate counsel and law firm attorneys express the need to cut through the hype and understand how to use and defend predictive coding.

These errors explain most the problems some lawyers have had with trying predictive coding.

Before we dive into the specifics of how exactly predictive coding works, we need to first address the name.

We like predictive coding anyway, so as long as the timing is doable, there might be the basis of a workable compromise here.

Clients benefit from efficient e-discovery services; saving costs on large, complex litigation cases by using predictive coding.

Well worth your time to read because many of the basic questions on predictive coding have already been asked and answered.

Although courts have endorsed the use of predictive coding, the pool of cases involving the technology is still quite shallow.

Industry - specific tools like case management and predictive coding software rarely appear outside the legal field.