Sentences with phrase «predictive coding cases»

2015 will see more predictive coding cases decided, and more definition will come, especially around the area of attorney - client privilege.

They have seen only a few predictive coding cases.

Not exact matches

Likewise, for cases that involve a mix of hard copy documents and electronic documents, it is better to deal with the hard copy documents manually, and use some form of predictive coding on the electronic documents to balance the manual work with a highly efficient approach for the digital portion.

As NSU explains, «This course provides hands - on experience for students on a number of key operational aspects of the practice of law, including the business foundation of successful law firm management; security and confidentiality of client information; marketing, public relations, advertising and social media; duties of technological competence under ABA «Ethics 20/20» amendments to the Model Rules of Professional Responsibility; predictive coding and other eDiscovery issues; client intake and case management; and issues related to the scope and composition of representation, including the unauthorized practice of law and unbundled legal services.»

Clients benefit from efficient e-discovery services; saving costs on large, complex litigation cases by using predictive coding.

Noting that the Tax Court had not previously addressed the issued of technology assisted review tools, Judge Buch concluded that the use of predictive coding in this case would provide a «happy medium» that would address both parties» concerns.

In this case he uses predictive coding to weed out unnecessary data and nearlines it for potential later need.

Industry - specific tools like case management and predictive coding software rarely appear outside the legal field.

Using a case study approach, industry experts will discuss workflow options incorporating predictive coding and analytics for three key scenarios: Hart - Scott - Rodino Second Requests, internal investigations and post-production trial preparation.

Case study examples of predictive coding and analytics working together on a Second Request, internal investigation and for trial prep

Ltd.Although the court acknowledged that the use of predictive coding may not be a good fit for every case, it decided that — where it is possible and appropriate — this method can and should be used alongside manual review to fulfill discovery requests for electronically stored information.

Am reading the memoranda for and against «predictive coding» from the Global Aerospace v. Landow case in the U.S..

Recent cases that demonstrate varying judicial perspectives on predictive coding's role in e-discovery

As stated above, small cases do not make good predictive coding candidates.

Predictive Coding and Technology Assisted Review («TAR») help ameliorate a problem that denigrates civil litigation: extortion by discovery when discovery costs «force settlements for reasons and on terms that related more to the costs of discovery than to the merits of the case.»

In this episode of The Digital Detectives, Sharon Nelson and John Simek discuss the evolution of e-discovery, how predictive coding works and is priced, and examples of cases that have involved predictive coding.

Simek and Nelson then go on to examine the prices vendors charge for the predictive coding process and in which cases it might be profitable for the law firm or client.

There is a steep, expensive learning curve involved; many mid-sized law firms probably will not profit and even very large cases only save an average of 15 % using predictive coding.

In what is being labelled a victory for proportionality, in the case of Pyrrho Investments v MWB Property, Master Matthews found that, given the three million - plus documents identified for review in the case, using predictive coding would be far preferable to undertaking a manual review.

The first formal judicial endorsement of the use of predictive coding in e-disclosure in the UK came from Master Matthews in his High Court ruling in the Pyrrho Investments v MWB Property Ltd case.

Interestingly, although the case comes just less than a year after U.S. Judge Peck's latest opinion on predictive coding in Rio Tinto Plc v. Vale S.A., it provides no reference to that ruling.

The case is valued in the tens of millions of pounds, so the cost of using predictive coding software is proportionate;

D4 has performed analytics on hundreds of cases using all features of the platform including Near - duplication, Email Threading, Themes, and Predictive Coding during the many years of experience consulting and implementing Equivio solutions.

In February 2016, a London court supported the use of predictive coding software in a legal disclosure process, which often involves lawyers receiving huge volumes of documents from those representing the other side in a case.

«Taylor Wessing, as acknowledged by the Master, played a pivotal role in assisting the court in concluding that the case before it was one in which predictive coding should be deployed by the parties during disclosure.

It is to be hoped therefore, that we have seen the birth of a new standard order that will be used in all cases where directions for the use of predictive coding are appropriate.»

The focus was on the practical applications of predictive coding for specific use cases, including for litigation, investigations and HSR second requests.

When respondents were asked for their perspectives on AI and its effect on the legal industry, 71 % predicted it would have the biggest impact on electronic discovery in the areas of case assessment and predictive coding (TAR), coming in next at 41 % was document automation, followed by legal research (40 %), contract analysis / automation (34 %), and case / outcome prediction (24 %).

Judge Peck addressed case law regarding predictive coding, and the importance of keeping both parties on the same page on parameters for using it throughout the case.

Landmark cases including Da Silva Moore have resulted in rulings favorable to predictive coding.

Predictive coding, in - place early case assessment (ECA), automatic document categorization and technology - assisted review (TAR), are becoming common place terms in e-discovery.

Click Here to Access the Webinar On - Demand Speaking from their extensive experience and varied practice specialties, our distinguished panelists will discuss scenarios and types of cases that make sense for the use of Technology Assisted Review / Predictive Coding — or not.

Many legal teams don't have the time or energy to build a case for why a predictive coding tool is necessary, so they stick with the status quo.

According to Exterro's 2015 Federal Judges Survey on E-Discovery Best Practices and Trends, 45 % of the responding judges said that they only «somewhat agreed» that predictive coding is employed with regularity in cases, while 41 % didn't agree with the statement at all.

Predictive analytics software used the coded cases as input and the facts of a new case.

By Michael Roach at 12:26 PM in Cases: Verdicts, Settlements, Rulings, Predictive / Computer - aided Coding, Products, Deals, Alliances Permalink Comments (0) TrackBack (0)

This approach enables the LexisNexis team to concentrate on PreDiscovery level by developing on a strong base of powerful early case assessment tools and integrating predictive coding, data analytics, and intelligent review devices across the workflow.

Back then he was the first judge to formally bless the use of predictive coding — deeming it «judicially - approved in appropriate cases» — paving the way for widespread use and acceptance of technology assisted review («TAR»).

Specifically, the judge, in that case, permitted the use of predictive coding for that review, a general term that at that time referred to programs that used algorithms to determine whether documents are relevant to a case.

In the first case to approve the use of predictive coding over a party's objection, a Virginia state court judge has signed off on the defense's computer - assisted review results.