As NewScientist reports, the new
predictive coding software could «sift through millions of documents and spit out only those the lawyer might need, saving them time and — crucially — their clients» money.»
In a recent study in the Richmond Journal of Law and Technology, lawyer labor was tested against lawyerbots with
predictive coding software.
Some specific features to look for in
predictive coding software include:
Reviewers code (label) each document in the seed set as responsive or unresponsive and input those results into
the predictive coding software.
However, in May, the High Court went further when two undisclosed parties disagreed on whether
predictive coding software should be used.
In February 2016, a London court supported the use of
predictive coding software in a legal disclosure process, which often involves lawyers receiving huge volumes of documents from those representing the other side in a case.
It is important to understand that Master Matthews's description of
predictive coding software (at paragraphs 19 to 24) is only one type of predictive coding workflow.
The case is valued in the tens of millions of pounds, so the cost of using
predictive coding software is proportionate;
Technology - assisted review (TAR), such as
predictive coding software, can help attorneys manage this process more efficiently.
Predictive Discovery combines an interdisciplinary expert team with
predictive coding software to help corporate and law firm attorneys review and produce documents for commercial litigation and regulatory investigations.
Are more attorney jobs about to be on the chopping block as
predictive coding software enters the world of ediscovery?
In addition, the time and cost savings that
predictive coding software can provide to attorneys and clients is invaluable.
Industry - specific tools like case management and
predictive coding software rarely appear outside the legal field.
Not exact matches
Paul is a PhD - qualified mathematician with more than a decade of commercial
software development experience and has provided expert witness testimony on
predictive coding methodology.
His primary focus in recent months has been on the UX for Lexis DiscoveryIQ, a new eDiscovery enterprise
software platform from LexisNexis that reimagines how and when
predictive coding is used in the workflow.
Additionally, 60 % of the respondents said that they would prefer to buy
predictive coding as a service, versus 33 % preferring to buy it as a
software.
Predictive coding involves training the
software program to identify a set of relevant documents from a broader set of potentially relevant documents.
And that's before we start to venture into the territory of the top end of eDiscovery
software and the vendors supplying
predictive coding systems based on NLP and machine learning.
Predictive coding may just be the beginning of the possible uses of technology
software in the legal industry.
Predictive coding continues to make inroads in eDiscovery demonstrating that
software analysis is more accurate and faster that hordes of associate lawyers clicking on documents on screens.
In his opinion, Magistrate Judge Treece specifically noted that, «With the advent of
software,
predictive coding, spreadsheets, and similar advances, the time and cost to produce large reams of documents can be dramatically reduced... the Court is more convinced than ever that [the subpoena] is not... an overwhelming and incomprehensible burden.»
With
predictive -
coding, the
software delivers results based on keywords that are set by seasoned attorneys, and then the
software can be tweaked to improve accuracy over time.
In eDiscovery, discussions about «artificial intelligence» generally focus on
predictive coding — the machine learning process that reduces the time human reviewers must spend reading non-relevant information — by teaching the
software to analyse periodic human feedback, learn for itself what information reviewers are actually interested in, and then locate that information.
Traditionally, manual review has been the standard in document production requests, but the introduction of
predictive -
coding software products could change that trend.
Fortunately for many doc review attorneys,
software hasn't completely eliminated the need for human reviewers, and
predictive coding raises at least two important issues for attorneys: (1) their legal obligations to conduct a reasonable search for responsive documents under federal discovery rules, and (2) their ethical obligation to safeguard a client's privileged information.
Whether we call these
software programs «
predictive coding,» «technology - assisted review» or something else entirely, how do you know that they are right for you as a cautious and risk - averse in - house lawyer?
Finally, and perhaps not obviously at all, lawyers also work with technology — not simply word processing and email, but
software for document generation, electronic discovery,
predictive coding and technology assisted review, analysis by rules - based expert systems, blockchain.
In the second installment of our series later this summer, we'll dive into one particular example of litigation
software with Etgen and explore why «
predictive coding» technology has so far failed to fulfill its promise in eDiscovery.
And that among these large firms more than twice as many will charge their clients for photocopies and «long distance phone calls» (really) than incorporate cost - saving strategies like
predictive coding for electronic discovery or document assembly
software for contract drafting.
E-discovery teams may use
software supporting
predictive coding of discovery material built on AI technologies.
However, emerging technologies that allow users to «train»
software to distinguish between relevant and non-relevant documents (typically known as
predictive coding, or technology assisted review) are making internal review much more viable (learn much more about this in the Review section of this guide).
It is the first technology - assisted review
software to offer real - time
predictive coding, showing the impact each training document has on relevance scores immediately when it is reviewed.
This gives you access to the latest, most advanced technology, people and infrastructure, including data reduction, processing, analytics,
predictive coding, data storage, project management and hosted review in your
software application of choice.
In giving his approval for the use of Millnet's
software, Master Matthews also noted that
predictive coding is in use in other jurisdictions, that there is no evidence that it is any less accurate than manual review, and that it provides greater consistency.
In the second piece, we dove into one particular example of litigation
software and explored why «
predictive coding» technology has so far failed to fulfill its promise in eDiscovery.
Multiple e-discovery
software vendors offer products featuring «
predictive coding» for streamlining review.
At the most basic level,
predictive coding is a «machine learning» process that involves using
software to take information entered by people and applying that logic to much larger data sets.
In a nutshell,
predictive coding is the practice of electronic document review carried out by sophisticated computer
software rather than by -LSB-...]
The
software can then automatically categorize new documents as the project progresses, using
predictive coding (aka technology - assisted review).
Predictive analytics
software used the
coded cases as input and the facts of a new case.
E-discovery
software with data analytics capabilities (including functionality like auto - classification,
predictive coding, and TAR, for example) have been available for quite some time now.
With the introduction of applicant tracking
software (ATS) that uses
coding and
predictive equations to screen out applicants, combined with the ever - tightening job market and an influx of qualified candidate, chances of your resume even getting in front of a decision maker are lower than ever.