Not exact matches
But NK has an habit to show - off how developed its
nuclear and missile industries are as a way to get - what they believe to be - some leverage, and each time they do so the threat becomes more credible and the USA has more justification for a
preemptive strike.
The big government (s) at the time were still considering whether a
preemptive nuclear first
strike might be a good strategy (the idea that World War III could be won in a few days or a week and without a lot of collateral damage)-- or not.
The big government (s) at the time were still considering whether a
preemptive nuclear first
strike might be a good strategy (the idea that World War III could be won in a few days or a week and without a lot of collateral damage)-- or not.
It would be unwise to jump to the conclusion that the many states that did not protest the Al - Kibar
strike instead acquiesced to it, thus indicating their support for a right to exercise
preemptive self - defense to eliminate
nuclear threats.