Sentences with phrase «preemptive war»
"Preemptive war" refers to a military action taken by one country to prevent or stop an attack from another country or group. It means that the country initiates the war first, believing that it is necessary to defend itself or its interests before the enemy strikes. Full definition
The «grave and gathering danger» hanging over the world is not so much the danger that Saddam Hussein presents (as President Bush insists) but the danger of American preemptive war against Iraq.
religion-online.org
In a speech in March 2003 he asked whether President Bush's United Methodist Church had failed him, and the world, by catechizing him so poorly that he could speak of preemptive war as a divine blessing.
«I am concerned about, first and foremost, freedom, unnecessary preemptive war, and spending over freedom,» he said.
It violates our most basic God - given rights just as Jesus would not advocate aggressive preemptive wars killing thousands of innocent civilians as a means of attaining peace.
Where are preemptive wars covered in the constitution?
These same commitments should lead us, however, to condemn the proposed preemptive war.
Preemptive war by definition does not satisfy this criterion, since it is waged not to avenge wrongs» actually committed (Augustine), but to prevent wrongs that are only anticipated.
When he discusses preemptive war, he requires authorization «in conditions of genuinely democratic disclosure,» a serious attempt to secure multilateral support, action only in last resort, and not leaving things worse than they were before the action was taken.
Fearful and intollerant of one another to the point of supporting preemptive wars against others with competing belief systems, the religious represent an inherent danger and should stop bribing children into these beliefs with presents on Christmas morning replete with a book full of fairy tales they are tasked to adopt as fact in exchange for the gifts.
It doesn't mean we ignore the immorality of preemptive wars.
In a letter to Obama at the time, Brennan said he was «a strong opponent of many of the policies of the Bush administration, such as the preemptive war in Iraq and coercive interrogation tactics, to include water boarding.»
Cardinal Ratzinger said that «preemptive war» is not part of just - war doctrine.
In September 2002, when a hundred scholars and ethicists signed a petition that read, «As Christian ethicists, we share a common moral presumption against a preemptive war on Iraq by the United States,» Elshtain was not numbered among the signatories.
It would violate standards of international law and create a dangerous precedent for other nations (China, India, Pakistan, Russia) that will decide to engage in preemptive wars that they believe are justified.
Given the immediacy of a threat, preemptive war may of necessity be a unilateral decision.
The first is pacifism, which opposes military action in all circumstances and thus condemns a preemptive war.
Characters in zombie films are willing to do terrible things to each other because of the fear of zombies and the urge for self preservation, while, in the real world, things like the use of torture (or «advanced interrogation»), preemptive war and drone strikes were being debated as options to fight a threat even scarier than zombies: terrorism.
According to the «just war» tradition, which does not deem all military action illegitimate, a preemptive war against Iraq would he morally unacceptable.
A preemptive war is unjust for a very simple reason: it can not be just to condemn masses of people to certain death in order to avert the potential death of an equal or lesser number of people.
Both would rule out as immoral a preemptive war against Iraq.
The preemptive war against Iraq is not «a great moral cause and a great strategic goal,» as President Bush claims.
Preemptive wars, abridgments of civil liberty, cuts in social service, subsidies to churches, and other like initiatives are not just wrapped in the flag; together with the flag, they are swathed in the holy.
As for the other questions, in case there is a preemptive war, any threatened country can launch the preemptive attack1 (I am not sure if an allied nation could, unless asked by the threatened party).
Hence logic is projected in a loop that revolves around the claim that maintaining peace is predicated on preemptive war.