Sentences with phrase «prefacing what»

«Let me preface what I'm about to say, so the civil libertarians understand what I'm saying, I believe the No. 1 civil right is to be free from harm.

If you have to preface what you are about to post with a warning that — despite the forth - coming comments — you are not racist, bigoted, closed - minded (or fill in the blank), then we've got some unfortunate news: You're probably about to write something racist, bigoted or closed - minded.

I'd like to preface what I am about to say by stating that I am actually a brutally honest person.

Sometimes you have to try to give people frank comments and advice, and in this particular case I did preface what I was saying by saying if they want to have a conversation about a political matter as well as a personal matter it is confidential, and you do expect people to behave in a trustworthy way, which these people from the Daily Telegraph didn't.

Let me preface what I'm about to say by letting you all know that between Serial, Making a Murderer and the mystery novels I've been listening to on Audible during long runs, I am on a total true crime kick.

Let me preface what comes next by saying that, by any objective measure, I am a successful author.

Let me preface what comes next with an unequivocal assertion.

Let me preface what follows with the statement that I love my dog and even some other dogs that are not members of my immediate family.

Not exact matches

This consists of prefacing your nuggets with a phrase that indicates the importance of what you're about to say.

The event was a breaking point in the community's resentment of L.A. police chief William Parker «and what they considered his double standard toward [African Americans] and whites,» according to LIFE magazine's editorial prefacing its Aug. 27, 1965, cover story on the riots.

So leave out the theoretically impact - softening preface and just say, as politely and professionally as you can, what you really mean.

Many of the proposed initiatives are prefaced by «we intend», «we will introduce legislation,» «we will propose», without providing details on what the government really intends to do.

What's even more amusing about that preface is that most Americas already are economically f*cked.

I am not sure what is more depressing / amusing: That the editor felt it necessary to add this platitudinous preface; Or that we live in a world where such nonsense now passes for a coherent comment.

It is no doubt that these unique experiences were the preface to what we now know as her iconic writings.

Two and a half centuries later the German philosopher Immanuel Kant, in the «Preface to the Second Edition» of his Critique of Pure Reason (1787), appropriated this «Copernican Revolution» in thought for his own shift from the presumed objectivity of what we know to the act of conscious knowing itself.2 It remains a contestable assessment because the movement is precisely in the opposite direction: After Copernicus, we humans are no longer understood to be in the center of the universe, whereas Kant concentrated precisely on the subjectivity of individual knowing.

Near Unto God by Abraham Kuyper; adapted by James C. Schaap Eerdmans, 235 pages, $ 14 paper Recent years have seen a massive upsurge of interest in Christian spirituality» what Richard Mouw calls, in the preface to this book, the «spirituality bust.»

I want to preface this post by stating that this is my interpretation of what was said in scripture.

I have stepped away and believe everything concerning Christianity should be prefaced with according to what is written in the Bible.

It's impossible to use religion as a preface for gun control, unless you manipulate the bible into meaning what you want it to mean.

Sabio: I thought of this just after I posted it... that people might assume this is my belief... when what I MEANT to say was, «According to Christian theology...», which is how I might preface such things in the future.

In Matthew's Gospel this strong teaching regarding the eternal significance of what one says is prefaced by an even stronger one: the passage concerning the unpardonable sin.

Papias, an important Christian teacher of Hierapolis about 150 A.D., tells us with what eagerness he listened to anyone who had talked with one of the apostles and who could therefore bring him some fresh memory of Jesus (This appears in the preface of Papias» work.

Whenever anyone prefaces a statement with, «This isn't about... whatever...» that's exactly what its about and this statement of «We don't mean to inflame...» is exactly what this is about.

This has always been the more liberal reading of his famous aphorism in the preface to that work, «What is rational is actual, and what is actual is ratioWhat is rational is actual, and what is actual is ratiowhat is actual is rational.

We don't think our book is perfect and we tell folks upfront (literally in the preface) to take what is helpful and leave the rest.

Nobo quotes from page xi of Ford's preface of The Emergence of Whitehead's Metaphysics: «This study will probably disturb prevailing interpretations of Whitehead's philosophy less than might be imagined, for the interpretations have largely been based on what I call -LSB-...] the final revisions» (60).

This is what Whitehead invariably tells us in the prefaces to many of his philosophical works:

A preface may serve a useful purpose if it provides the prospective reader with some indication of what he may expect in the pages to follow.

They wouldn't do so, of course, if they knew what Nadler knows» not from the preface itself but as a result of his grasp of Spinoza's entire teaching» that Spinoza doesn't really intend to exclude Judaism and Christianity from the category of superstition.

What he actually does in the preface is lament the ways in which pagan superstition has twisted and distorted the true religion spelled out in what he repeatedly refers to as the sacred books of Scripture and the divine law revealed through the prophets and the apostWhat he actually does in the preface is lament the ways in which pagan superstition has twisted and distorted the true religion spelled out in what he repeatedly refers to as the sacred books of Scripture and the divine law revealed through the prophets and the apostwhat he repeatedly refers to as the sacred books of Scripture and the divine law revealed through the prophets and the apostles.

The worst part about the Issues sections is that each set of solutions is prefaced with a long whine about what Obama did wrong.

In the preface we learn that the «Christian Bible» is a «very severe revision» of the «Bible of the Jews»; that the New Testament regards the Old Covenant as «superseded»; that the proper term for the New Testament is the Belated Testament (since what is earlier is Best, the Hebrew Scriptures are the Original Testament); that Jesus was confessed as Messiah by Christians (were Jesus and the Twelve not Jews?)

That Pratt was conscious that he was doing something new in this realm is clear from his Preface, though I feel that he was not quite clear as to what it was.

William C. Placher, professor of philosophy and religion at Wabash College in Indiana, offers what he modestly describes as «an extended preface to contemporary discussions about theological method.»

In these few chapters which formed the preface for Israel's testimony to what YHWH had done in her history, Israel strikingly portrayed the spiritual poverty and bankruptcy of the human race.

In his preface to the Philosophy of Right, Hegel famously remarks that the owl of Minerva takes flight only as dusk is falling, which is to say that philosophy comes only at the end of an age, far too late in the day to tell us how the world ought to be; it can at most merely ponder what already has come to pass and so begun to pass away.

My purpose is to recall, in a short preface, what took place between you and me in order to show the pious reader the argument and the content of the book, together with an example... It is now almost sixteen years since I became a monk, taking the vow without your knowledge and against your will.

The book in question, The Sword in the Stone, was the first volume in what was to become a tetralogy of very loose adaptations from Malory (its author referred to it as «a preface»).

Each recipe is prefaced by a bit of prose that reveals the stories behind what makes Lily's heart tick.

Just to sort of preface the wrap - up — 1) I write about all of the games using a statistical review; I do not see nearly enough of the games to have a decent opinion as to what is going on..

Let me just preface this entire story with: the hardest thing about this recipe is figuring out what to call it.

I will preface this blog post the same way I did my first schedule post by saying that all children are different and yours might not necessarily fit into this schedule perfectly every single day but it is just meant as a guide to know what is typical at each age and as your child grows.

Prefacing is a tease, a sham, the ultimate «I've got some good news and I've got some bad news» method to get across what is usually merely bad news.

Just a preface... American line of thought on «Liberal» to the degree where it's almost a curse word in the population does not align with what liberalism is.

I am going to preface this with setting aside any theoretical or factual crimes against humanity and focus on the law and what by the law would be and is legal.

Charting what he terms the «soap - opera» years of the Labour government, his book continues to ruffle feathers with an updated preface bringing the story up to the tempestuous present.

Prefacing it with «people are gonna say, «Bo what are you, communist?»»

«It must be hard,» I thought, «having to preface every answer to «What do you do?»

I'm going to preface this by saying that it's actually hard to define what constitutes low or high - carb.