Perhaps before the voters go to the polls Mr Livingstone might consider announcing that he does not want the first or second
preference votes of people who support terrorism.
The second
preference votes of people who voted for one of the eliminated candidates are then looked at.
Not exact matches
«I believe in an America where the separation
of church and state is absolute — where no Catholic prelate would tell the President (should he be Catholic) how to act, and no Protestant minister would tell his parishoners for whom to
vote — where no church or church school is granted any public funds or political
preference — and where no man is denied public office merely because his religion differs from the President who might appoint him or the
people who might elect him.
Is this open for intentional gaming (via tactical
voting) or unintentional skewing
of the results towards a film or location, where the winning result does not match most
people's
preferences?
I believe that Alternative
Vote (AV) system, where
people rank candidates in order
of preference rather than selecting only one, has much to commend it.
In practice in Australia in the Senate most
people vote by group and their
vote is distributed by the
preferences of the one party they
vote for.
The candidate with the lowest number
of first
preference votes is eliminated after each round
of voting and their
votes are then reassigned until one
person passes the 50 % mark.
However, many
of these are second
preference votes for
people already
voting for Boris Johnson and Ken Livingstone.
However, I'm always slightly wary
of constituency polls in Liberal Democrat held seats — the effect
of incumbency and tactical
voting is far higher for Lib Dem MPs, and when you ask a generic
voting intention I think many
people give their national
preference, rather than how they would actually
vote in their own constituency.
In the forty constituencies that they contested, the
People Before Profit Alliance won 5.2 %
of the first
preference votes cast in these.
Running 43 candidates (four more candidates than the Anti Austerity Alliance did), the
People Before Profit Alliance won 29,081
votes across the state, amounting to 1.7 %
of the first
preference votes cast nationally.
At the Dublin European Elections contest, sitting MEP Paul Murphy (Socialist Party / Anti Austerity Alliance) won 29,953 first
preference votes (8.5 %
of the
votes), leaving him in sixth place on the first count, and Brid Smith (
People Before Profit Alliance) won 23,875
votes (6.8 %).
«I think Zac is a candidate who is well placed to appeal to
people's second
preference votes... And the other key thing that he needs to do is to pick away at the credibility
of what Sadiq is offering,» says Barwell.
Miliband, for example, it was reported, bequeathed South Shields a voter contact rate (the percentage
of people in the constituency for whom the party has a record
of voting preference) as low as 0.2 % — or roughly 100
people.
Apart from seniors, this group
of people, cutting across all lines
of geographic location, class, race, religion, age, sexual
preference, gender, etc. is potentially the largest
voting block.
Jack Straw has said he is not opposed to the idea
of the alternative
vote system where
people can rank their
preferences for MPs, but it is a hardly a radical change to the way we elect our politicians and the Tory leader David Cameron has said that at least with first past the post you can kick out a government.
The assumption that even if
people vote for David first they will back Ed second means that if David doesn't win on the first count, the inclusion
of second
preference votes could mean Ed prevails in the end.
If we had known that, say, the majority
of second
preference votes had been for Labour where first
preference votes had been for the Green Party, the Lib Dems or the Nationalists, this would have made a coalition involving Labour far more likely, making the coalition a much better reflection
of what
people actually wanted.
In Mark Ferguson's excellent expose
of «community campaigning» in South Shields under David Miliband's watch, he reveals that the voter contact rate (the percentage
of people in the constituency for whom the party has a record
of voting preference) in the constituency was as low as 0.2 %.
As for the suggestion that
people will
vote for change, regardless
of substance, in
preference to the status quo, I refer you to the recent referendum on the alternative
vote.
However a lot has been made
of the fact that while both polls had an effort to take account
of people's personal and tactical
voting behaviour in their own constituency, they did so in different ways — Ashcroft asks a two stage question, asking
people their national
preference and then how they will
vote thinking about the candidates and parties in their own constituency; ICM asked
people the
voting intention question including the names
of the candidates standing in Sheffield Hallam.
This makes sense in that the purpose
of fake news is often not to convince
people of «alternative facts,» but rather to sow doubt and to disengage
people politically, which can undermine the democratic process, especially when society's future hinges on small differences in
voting preferences.
We asked 300
people to
vote for the most important trait in a short term personal loan and nearly 93 percent
of respondents
voted for «safety» as being at the very top
of their «personal
preference» list.
The firm is alleged to have harvested data
of tens
of millions
of Facebook users without permission in order to design a software to predict and influence
people's
voting preferences.