The following, adapted from the Chicago Manual of Style, 15th edition, is
the preferred citation for this article.
The preferred citation for material from this collection is: Description of item (with date), Whitney Museum of American Art Archives, Edward and Josephine Hopper Research Collection, series, folder title.
Not exact matches
after seeing that every
citation in this post was a fail, i do nt consider him a reliable resource
for information and
prefer the science journals themselves.
That is a nice link with good info, but our community
prefers to have the relevant portions of the link quoted here (with
citations of course)
for the common even that links go bad.
At least a few years ago another reason to
prefer a cite to a paper reporter was that the online service's
citation was nearly useless unless you subscribed to that particular service while a search
for a paper reporters
citation would more than likely help you find the case on the majority of online services.
My own
preferred solution would be
for interested parties to maintain a standard
citation guide online in a wiki format, where issues in uniform
citation can be openly and intensively discussed.
Or if you have reached the
citation stage of an article you are writing and you need to find a
preferred abbreviation
for a journal you can reverse your search and type in the title of a report or a journal in order to retrieve a
preferred and alternative abbreviation.
I would thus
prefer to have a distinctive
citation for the LexisNexis version (other than an ugly URI), but who knows what that would be?