Nothing is said about omniscience including any direct
prehension of actuality.
Many believe that this divine knowledge of evil, pain, and degradation is not possible apart from the actual physical
prehension of the actualities of the world as they happen.
His prehensions of these actualities as they occur are unified into a harmony.
Not exact matches
The structure
of a physical
prehension bears this out: it is a present, subjective appropriation
of a determinately unified
actuality, which must be past in order to be fully determinate.
There is still, however, the same threefold character: (i) The «primordial nature»
of God is the concrescence
of a unity
of conceptual feelings... (ii) The «consequent nature»
of God is the physical
prehension by God
of the
actualities of the evolving universe... (iii) The «superjective» nature10
of God is the character
of the pragmatic value
of his specific satisfaction qualifying the transcendent creativity in the various temporal instances.
It looks back to the constitution
of an actual occasion by other
actualities in terms
of internal relations (
prehensions) in Science and the Modern World and forward to «transition» (PR 210C).
Its function, we said, is God's conditioning
of temporal
actuality as a result
of his
prehension and harmonization
of the antecedent world.
The consequent nature
of God is «the physical
prehension by God
of the
actualities of the evolving universe» (PR 134).
At any rate, the function that does seem relatively clear is that God conditions temporal
actuality as a result
of his
prehension and harmonization
of the antecedent world.
...
prehension is a radically one - way dependence
of an
actuality upon «antecedent» conditions, that is, temporally prior
actualities prehending is a form
of including, whereby reality is enriched, «increased» in multiplicity
of factors.
5To simplify the following analysis, I shall assume (with Whitehead) that
prehension is the only form
of causal influence between
actualities and that all eternal objects are uncreated and hence definite.
It arises out
of a particular stage
of the world through its «objectification» or nonconscious «
prehension»
of the systematically arrayed
actualities in its past (PR 5lff / 81ff.)
What is at least analogical in the scheme is the idea
of prehension as dependence
of an
actuality on other
actualities, or
of participation, feeling
of feeling, experience
of experience, together with sense
of futurity.
The
prehension of God's consequent nature (how God has prehended the past
actuality of that occasion) reveals a specific response to the past occasion.
It possesses a set
of physical
prehensions, the way by which it prehends other past
actualities which causally influence it.
We have already seen that each
actuality is an organismic unity, whether it be the unity
of prehensions in an actual occasion, the unity
of a nexus
of actual occasions, or even the unity
of many nexus.
In his account, a
prehension is the way in which one
actuality participates in the constitution
of another
actuality.
The romantic stage is similar to the
prehension of data from the past and the lure
of the possibilities
of the future; the stage
of precision parallels the stage
of the creative synthesis
of these data and possibilities; the stage
of generalization resembles the final stage
of the becoming
of a momentary experience, the culmination
of an
actuality's drive toward fulfillment, or in Whitehead's word, satisfaction.
The fact that the
prehension of other
actualities is a
prehension»
of them as other supplies the basis for one
of Whitehead's central concepts, that
prehensions have a «vector» character (PR 28).
But by the principle
of relativity there can only be one non-derivative
actuality, unbounded by its
prehensions of an actual world.
In his primordial nature God prehends the infinite realm
of possibilities; in his consequent nature he prehends the
actualities of the world his superjective nature is a result
of weaving his consequent
prehensions upon his primordial vision.
Each
actuality is related to other entities by
prehensions, which are components
of the concrescences
of the others.
The mental pole is the entity's
prehensions of eternal objects, not as embedded in past
actualities, but as potentials apart from their role in any particular entity.
Often it almost seems as if Whitehead gives precedence to
prehension over [actual] entity, as when he drops the remark that a
prehension could be taken for a [complete]
actuality even though it ultimately makes up only an aspect
of the [actual] entity [248] as a subordinate element
of its totality.
The process theory
of sequential societies
of actualities, each
of which is created and then persists thereafter as an objectified datum
of prehension in later
actualities, seems calculated to take the complexities into account more definitely and naturally than any talk about a rigorous continuity
of action defining a single, identical, yet changing individual.
«With the purpose
of obtaining a one - substance cosmology, «
prehensions» are a generalization from Descartes» mental «cogitations», and from Locke's «ideas», to express the most concrete mode
of analysis applicable to every grade
of individual
actuality» (PR 19/29).
(2) Direct
prehensions of satisfactions other than those presented by God's superject, that is, direct
prehensions of those who reach satisfaction in unison with the last divine
actuality.
Prehending others, in addition to one's
prehension of God, is a metaphysical necessity because no
actuality can begin to create without a novel standpoint Novelty is only possible if an
actuality begins with an actual world different from any accomplishment already in being.
In the latter, a nexus is felt as one actual entity, whereas in the former the object
of the
prehension is one
actuality.
«The
prehension into God
of each creature is directed with the subjective air» (PR 523), and «the wisdom
of subjective aim prehends every
actuality for what it can be in such a perfected system» (PR 525).