Sentences with phrase «prejudicial error»

The appellate court determined that exclusion of the evidence was prejudicial error.

The study, funded in large part by the Open Society Institute, shows that the overall rate of prejudicial error in the capital punishment system is 68 %.

To the court, the $ 93 million settlement reached 11 months ago found «no substantial question of law» and «no prejudicial error.»

Not exact matches

Unfortunately, the husband did not provide any detail regarding exactly how the alleged errors were prejudicial to him.

There is usually an exemption to the requirement to obtain a direction from noteholders where the trustee is of the opinion that the relevant waiver, modification or amendment is (i) proper to make and not materially prejudicial to the interests of the relevant noteholders, (ii) to correct a manifest and proven error or (iii) formal, minor or technical.

The appellate court did find the lower court erred by admitting the entire arbitral award at trial, but found the error was not prejudicial in nature.)

R. v. Jackson, 2014 SCC 30 (35622) Abella J.: «The trial judge made no error in determining... the minimal probative value of the proposed evidence... substantially outweighed by its prejudicial effect».

With regard to the Cawthorne matter, the decision not to grant a mistrial was within the military judge's discretion: he made a reasonable attempt to remedy the error through two instructions, one immediate and another mid-trial; in his mid-trial instruction, he instructed the panel to disregard the evidence because it was both «unreliable and prejudicial»; nothing suggested to the judge that the panel was unwilling or unlikely to follow his instruction.

C.A., Oct. 17, 2013)(35622) Judgment rendered Apr. 23, 2014 Abella J.: — ``... [no] basis for interfering with the reasons of Gillese J.A. and, in particular, with her conclusion that the trial judge made no error in determining that the minimal probative value of the proposed evidence was substantially outweighed by its prejudicial effect».

-- Riker v. State, 111 Nev. 1316, 1328, 905 P. 2d 706, 713 (1995)(to warrant review, appellant must show that alleged error was patently prejudicial)