Sentences with phrase «preliminary response»

Sixteen states plus the District of Columbia have already submitted their implementation plans to the U.S. Department of Education (USDE), which has given preliminary responses to many states and has now approved several of those plans.

In parts 1 and 2 of this series, we offered preliminary responses to a representative sampling of observations from one recent survey of teachers at an elementary school in its second year of implementation.

At least four schools (Lakehead, Thompson Rivers, Ottawa (Common Law) and my own, UVic) have posted preliminary responses on their websites.

Last month we began an extended report on the two reports issued on February 27 and on some of the preliminary responses to the reports.

Government consultation 4.36 As part of its preliminary response to the Grocery Inquiry and in line with its 2007 election commitment, the Government committed to respond appropriately and carefully to concerns about creeping acquisitions.

«Based on the preliminary response we've received thus far, we expect the unique attributes this diaper offers will be well - received by moms and our retail customers, and will help drive incremental dollar growth in the category,» said Thibault.

The City Council added the rebuilding of the center to their preliminary response to the mayor's budget.

The New York City Council highlighted five areas of concern in its preliminary response to Mayor Bill de Blasio's $ 45.9 billion capital budget for Fiscal 2019 - 2022 and accompanying $ 79.6 billion capital commitment plan for Fiscal 2018 - 2022.

The preliminary response data are promising, she said.

So, in my preliminary responses, soooooo many of you have mentioned that my Stitch Fix reviews are some of your favorite posts and SOOOOOO many of you have been asking if I still get a monthly fix!

Perhaps the most significant rule change in the USPTO's current final rule changes is the ability of patent owners to submit testimonial evidence, such as expert declarations, in their preliminary response to a petition for AIA review.

Under 35 U.S.C. Section 315 (c), after an IPR is instituted, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) may join a petitioner in a subsequently - filed IPR «that the director, after receiving a preliminary response under section 313 or the expiration of the time for filing such a response, determines warrants the institution of an inter partes review under section 314.»

If the Director institutes an inter partes review, the Director, in his or her discretion, may join as a party to that inter partes review any person who properly files a petition under section 311 that the Director, after receiving a preliminary response under section 313 or the expiration of the time for filing such a response, determines warrants the institution of an inter partes review under section 314.

allow patent owners to submit expert declarations or other new testimonial evidence, with their preliminary response to a petition seeking institution of an AIA review;

The Engineer has a positive duty within 14 days of receipt of the Notice of Claim to give a preliminary response if he considers the initial Notice is time barred.

Patent owners responding to a petition should also carefully review the prosecution history and, where appropriate, take advantage of the Preliminary Response to argue that the petition offers nothing new.

Section 314 (b) mandates that the Board «shall determine whether to institute an inter partes review... within 3 months after --(1) receiving a preliminary response to the petition...; or (2) if no such preliminary response is filed, the last date on which such response may be filed.»

A patent owner's preliminary response filed prior to an institution decision and a patent owner's response filed after institution are both official papers filed with the PTO and made available to the public.

The Aylus decision points out that this strategy is not without risk because any statement made in a preliminary response, including claim construction arguments, may be used later to construe claim language.

In a panel decision written by Circuit Judge Stoll, the court held that statements made during IPR proceedings, including in the patent owner's preliminary response, can be used to construe a patent's claims, and may result in a disclaimer of claim scope if the statements are a clear and unmistakable surrender of claim scope.

The preliminary responses included statements concerning one limitation in the «412 patent claims, «wherein the CPP logic is invoked to negotiate media content delivery between the MS and the MR -LSB-.]»

Apple argued that the claims should be construed in light of statements Aylus made in its preliminary response to the Patent Office, and under Apple's proposed construction the accused AirPlay device did not infringe.

During the IPR, Aylus filed a preliminary response arguing why Apple's petitions should not be instituted.

Shire filed a preliminary response in January of 2016.

At the very least, the preliminary response provides the patent owner with a chance to persuade the PTAB not to institute the IPR.

Within six months from filing, the PTAB reviews the petition and patent owner's preliminary response (if any).

Once a petition is filed, the patent owner has three months to submit a preliminary response.

Yes, a patent owner may file a preliminary response to a post grant review petition to provide reasons why no post grant review should be instituted.

The preliminary response was overwhelming and I should be looking to conduct another run really soon.

Their document was titled: A proposed Emergency Response and Development Plan to protect Aboriginal children in the Northern Territory — A preliminary response to the Australian Government's proposals [53], released on 10 July 2007 and outlines steps to protect children in Northern Territory Aboriginal communities in both the short and long term.

[13] Combined Aboriginal Organisations of the Northern Territory, A proposed emergency response and development plan to protect Aboriginal children in the Northern Territory: A preliminary response to the Australian Government's proposals, 10 July 2007, p. 3.