Sentences with phrase «premises in a safe condition»

Anyone who owns, leases, or manages a property where people are allowed or invited to enter is required by law in Colorado to maintain the premises in a safe condition, to promptly correct any potential hazard and, in the meantime, to provide clear warnings and barriers to keep people from harm.

Owners and operators of businesses owe customers who have entered the business premises the duty to keep the premises in a safe condition and to warn customers of the existence of dangerous conditions on the premises.

No duty is imposed by law on an owner or occupant to keep the premises in a safe condition for those who come there solely for their own convenience or pleasure, and who are not either expressly invited to enter or induced to come thereon, although their entry is permitted by the owner or occupant.

Slip and fall or trip and fall accidents can happen because a house or business owner has failed to maintain their premises in a safe condition.

Numerous accidents occur daily because property owners fail to keep their premises in a safe condition.

Unsafe stairways and walkways present another area where accidents often occur due to a property owner's failure to maintain the premises in a safe condition.

Not exact matches

I / we agree that if any material change (s) occur (s) in my / our financial condition that I / we will immediately notify BSHFC of said change (s) and unless Baby Safe Homes Franchise Corporation is so notified it may continue to rely upon the application and financial statement and the representations made herein as a true and accurate statement of my / our financial condition.nI / we authorize Baby Safe Homes Franchise Corporation to make whatever credit inquiries / background checks it deems necessary in connection with this application and financial statement.nI / we authorize and instruct any person or consumer reporting agency to furnish to BSHFC any information that it may have to obtain in response to such credit inquiries.nIn consideration of the ongoing association between Baby Safe Homes and the undersigned applicant (hereinafter u201cApplicantu201d), the parties hereto have entered into this Non-Disclosure and Non-Competition Agreement.nWHEREAS, in the course of its business operations, Baby Safe Homes provides its customers products and services which, by nature of the business, include trade secrets, confidential and proprietary information, and other matters deemed material or important enough to warrant protection; and WHEREAS, Applicant, by reason of his / her interest in Baby Safe Homes and in the course of his / her duties, has access to said secrets and confidential information; and WHEREAS, Baby Safe Homes has trade secrets and other confidential and proprietary information, including procedures, customer lists, and particular desires or needs of such customers to which Applicant has access in the course of his / her duties as an Applicant.nNow, therefore, in consideration of the premises contained herein, the parties agree as follows Applicant shall not, either during the time of his / her franchise evaluation with Baby Safe Homes or at any time thereafter either directly or indirectly, communicate, disclose, reveal, or otherwise use for his / her own benefit or the benefit of any other person or entity, any trade secrets or other confidential or proprietary information obtained by Employee by virtue of his / her employment with Baby Safe Homes, in any manner whatsoever, any such information of any kind, nature, or description concerning any matters affecting or relating to the Baby Safe Homes business, or in the business of any of its customers or prospective customers, except as required in the course of his / her employment by Baby Safe Homes or except as expressly authorized Baby Safe Homes Franchise Corporation, in writing.nDuring any period of evaluation with Baby Safe Homes, and for two (2) years thereafter, Applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, induce or influence, divert or take away, or attempt to divert or take away and, during the stated period following termination of employment, call upon or solicit, or attempt to call upon or solicit, any of the customers or patrons Baby Safe Homes including, but not limited to, those upon whom he / she was directly involved, or called upon, or catered to, or with whom became acquainted while engaged in the franchise evaluation process of a Baby Safe Homes franchise business.

In Florida, owners of parking lots have two duties of care to their invitees: (1) to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition and (2) to give warning of concealed perilIn Florida, owners of parking lots have two duties of care to their invitees: (1) to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition and (2) to give warning of concealed perilin a reasonably safe condition and (2) to give warning of concealed perils.

Premises liability states that the landowner and the tenant of property, whether commercial, agricultural, public, or residential, have a duty to all visitors to maintain the property in a safe condition.

Property owners in Tennessee and neighboring states have an obligation to keep their premises in a reasonably safe condition so that people who enter the property lawfully are not exposed to unreasonable risks.

Premises liability occurs when an owner or occupier fails in a duty to maintain property in a safe condition and a visitor is injured.

The underlying principle of premises liability cases is that whoever owns or controls a piece of property or building has duty to maintain the property in a reasonable safe condition.

All business owners are required to maintain their premises in reasonably safe condition and warn of hidden dangers.

In a premises liability case, a person is hurt on someone else's property and they file a lawsuit claiming that the property wasn't kept in a safe enough condition or that there wasn't proper warning of a hazardous conditioIn a premises liability case, a person is hurt on someone else's property and they file a lawsuit claiming that the property wasn't kept in a safe enough condition or that there wasn't proper warning of a hazardous conditioin a safe enough condition or that there wasn't proper warning of a hazardous condition.

In general, Florida landowners are required to ensure that their premises are in a safe condition for visitorIn general, Florida landowners are required to ensure that their premises are in a safe condition for visitorin a safe condition for visitors.

Landowners or occupiers have a duty to guard against foreseeable injuries and to maintain a premises in reasonably safe conditions.

Essentially, this requires that the premises used by residents and visitors be kept in a safe condition and not expose anyone to danger unnecessarily.

A slip or trip and fall claim is based upon the concept of premises liability, which holds property owners liable if they fail in their duty to keep you safe from hazardous conditions.

This court abolished, in premises liability actions involving a slip and fall on snow and ice, the distinction between natural and unnatural accumulations of snow and ice, which had constituted an exception to the general rule of premises liability that a property owner owes a duty to all lawful visitors to use reasonable care to maintain its property in a reasonably safe condition in view of all the circumstances [370 - 384]; further, this court saw no reason to limit its holding to prospective application [384 - 386].

Using the evidence discovered in your case, it must be proven that the defendant / property owner failed to maintain his / her premises in a reasonable and safe condition.

In BC, the Occupiers Liability Act covers property or premise liability, and requires that property owners — home owners, business owners and municipalities — keep their premises safe and in good condition to make sure that visitors aren't injureIn BC, the Occupiers Liability Act covers property or premise liability, and requires that property owners — home owners, business owners and municipalities — keep their premises safe and in good condition to make sure that visitors aren't injurein good condition to make sure that visitors aren't injured.

The landowner, property manager, landlord, tenant, occupant, etc. breached their legal duty to the injured party (typically by failing to keep the premises reasonably safe and / or to warn of any known dangerous conditions on the property, or failing to investigate the potential for dangerous conditions in a commercial setting)

They must also keep the premises in a reasonably safe condition.

The landowner, property manager, landlord, tenant, occupant, etc. owed a legal duty to the injured party (typically, a duty to keep the premises reasonably safe and / or to warn of any known dangerous conditions on the property, as well as a duty to investigate the potential for dangerous conditions in a commercial setting)

Yes, a person can sue for damages caused to their then - unborn child by lead paint in an apartment where it can be established that the landlord was negligent in maintaining the premises is a reasonably safe condition.

In general, the restaurant owner or operator has an obligation to keep the premises in a reasonably safe conditioIn general, the restaurant owner or operator has an obligation to keep the premises in a reasonably safe conditioin a reasonably safe condition.

Failure to maintain the property in a safe condition entitles the injured party to file a premises liability claim for negligence against the hotel or motel.

Property owners have a duty maintain premises in a reasonably safe condition.

An «occupier» is defined in the legislation as including «(a) a person who is in physical possession of premises; or (b) a person who has responsibility for and control over the condition of premises or the activities there carried on, or control over persons allowed to the premises...» An occupier's duty of care under the legislation is as follows: «An occupier of premises owes a duty to take such care as in all the circumstances of the case is reasonable to see that persons entering on the premises, and the property brought on the premises by those persons are reasonably safe while on the premises.»

Premises liability law, which requires an owner or manager of land to maintain the premises in reasonably safe condition and warn visitors of known hazards, imposes few obligations in regard to tresPremises liability law, which requires an owner or manager of land to maintain the premises in reasonably safe condition and warn visitors of known hazards, imposes few obligations in regard to trespremises in reasonably safe condition and warn visitors of known hazards, imposes few obligations in regard to trespassers.

It has to be proved beyond a doubt that someone was negligent or should have reasonably known that the premises were in an unsafe condition, and that they still did not take proper steps and precautions to make it a safe space.

Although a business invitor is not a guarantor of the safety of those who might be expected on the property, a duty remains to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition for prospective business invitees.

For a breach of duty to occur, the business must fail to keep the premises in reasonably safe condition.

While the law in Connecticut does not require landlords and building owners to insure that the walkways leading to their buildings and the vestibules inside the buildings are completely free of all snow and ice, it requires that the maintain the premises and the walkways leading to the buildings in a «reasonably safe condition.»

Under premises liability laws in Virginia, property owners have a duty to keep their properties safe by warning of dangerous conditions that might cause someone to slip, trip or fall and suffer injury.

In Lincoln, all property owners have a duty to keep their premises in a reasonably safe condition and to maintain their property, so as not to pose any unreasonable hazards to visitorIn Lincoln, all property owners have a duty to keep their premises in a reasonably safe condition and to maintain their property, so as not to pose any unreasonable hazards to visitorin a reasonably safe condition and to maintain their property, so as not to pose any unreasonable hazards to visitors.

In Ontario, the Occupiers Liability Act governs this area of law and places a duty on property owners (homeowners, business owners, tenants) to keep their premises in a reasonably safe condition to prevent injury of visitors, for appropriate steps to be taken to correct any hazardous conditions and to warn persons of any hazards on the propertIn Ontario, the Occupiers Liability Act governs this area of law and places a duty on property owners (homeowners, business owners, tenants) to keep their premises in a reasonably safe condition to prevent injury of visitors, for appropriate steps to be taken to correct any hazardous conditions and to warn persons of any hazards on the propertin a reasonably safe condition to prevent injury of visitors, for appropriate steps to be taken to correct any hazardous conditions and to warn persons of any hazards on the property.