Sentences with phrase «premises owners know»

What is the basis for this legal concept, and what should both injury victims and premises owners know to help their legal situations?

Not exact matches

«AC» is known for its vast boardwalk, Developed by Alexander Boardman, the first in the world, being built over a century ago by local business owners who wanted to prevent sand from being tracked onto their premises.

Grantee agrees to pay Owner for each new road constructed by Grantee for the Easement Term and existing roads improved by Grantee on the Premises a one - time payment based on Eight Thousand and No / 100 Dollars ($ 8,000.00) per mile, with a minimum payment of Eight Thousand and No / 100 Dollars ($ 8,000.00) regardless of the actual distance of any such road.

In Florida, if you get injured on someone else's property, whether it is a private home or a business frequented by the general public, the law that controls whether the property owner is liable is known as premises liability law.

An individual will want an attorney who knows the most recent changes in the premises liability law, and knows the difference between dog bite laws, slip and fall laws, and business owners liability.

Represent victims of negligent property owners who have not taken reasonable steps to protect tenants, visitors, and others from known dangers on their premises.

Due to a recent ruling by the Supreme Court of Texas, it is easier for businesses and property owners to defend against premises injury cases like slip and fall accidents, specifically dangers that are deemed «known or obvious.»

This area of Florida premises liabilty law is known as «negligent security» and it allows a crime victim to obtain money damages (pain and suffering, lost wages, medical expenses, long term medical care needs, etc.) from the owner and / or operator or any other person or entitly in control of that commercial establishment.

Since premises liability cases typically involve a condition, in order to prove the case the lawyer needs to demonstrate that the owner knew or reasonably should have known about the condition.

Our attorneys understand North Carolina premises liability law and know how to find applicable insurance coverage to compensate you for your injuries and how to hold negligent property owners liable.

Additionally, our Texas premises liability lawyers handle much more severe cases, including third - party assaults that result from a property owner's failure to protect their patrons from known hazards.

If the gas station owner or operator knew about the oil slick and was negligent in failing to either clean it up or post a warning, you may be able to make a premises liability claim and seek compensation of your medical bills, lost wages, disability and disfigurement, pain and suffering, and loss of normal life.

When the owner of a business or other property knows or should have known that an unsafe condition existed and someone who was legally on the property was hurt, a premises liability claim may arise.

Proving that a property owner acted carelessly in a premises liability case often requires gathering detailed evidence about the condition of the property and whether or not the property owner knew or had reason to know that the dangerous condition existed.

The appellate court explained that to recover compensation in a premises liability claim, a plaintiff must show that the defendant knew or should have known about the danger and that the plaintiff lacked knowledge of the danger, in spite of his ordinary care, due to actions or conditions within the owner's control.

For these visitors, the premises owner must correct or warn of dangers the owner knows or should know of through reasonable care.

The law of premises liability varies somewhat from state to state, though most states» laws impose a duty upon the owner of premises to exercise reasonable care to protect children who have been invited on or are known to be present on the owner's premises safe from harm, including the harm of sexual assault.

What you may not know is that you also may have recourse in civil courts against the owner or operator of the hotel or nightclub where the crime happened if you can prove that their negligence in providing security on the premises allowed the crime to happen.

It also means that the defect in the premises was something the owner or occupier knew about or should have known about and either failed to correct it or warn you about it.

No matter how you've been injured, you may have grounds to file a premises liability lawsuit if you believe the property owner acted negligently and that your injuries may have been avoidable.

Slip and fall injuries when unsafe conditions that caused the slip and fall were known to the owners or operators and the type of injury was foreseeable, and the hazard was not known to you, not open and obvious, and not caused by your misuse of the premises

Property owners are required to maintain their premises free from defects and are to warn of any known defects, but «only reasonable care» is required.

In a premises liability case, an injured victim claims that a property owner either did not remove a hazard they knew about or failed to warn visitors of the existing hazard.

Anyone who has been on a premise where the property owner knew about the hazard but invited you anyway and you were injured should have a personal injury case.

This may also be filed for a premises liability case especially if the owner knew about the hanging branch, but did not do something about it.

If a property owner knows about a hazard and does nothing to fix it or warn visitors about the danger, he or she may be held liable (legally responsible) in a premises liability lawsuit.

The suit seems to rely in part on the legal theory of premises liability, in which the owner or manager of real property has a duty to maintain reasonably safe premises for guests, and to warn guests of known hazards.

Premises liability law, which requires an owner or manager of land to maintain the premises in reasonably safe condition and warn visitors of known hazards, imposes few obligations in regard to tresPremises liability law, which requires an owner or manager of land to maintain the premises in reasonably safe condition and warn visitors of known hazards, imposes few obligations in regard to trespremises in reasonably safe condition and warn visitors of known hazards, imposes few obligations in regard to trespassers.

«It also is well settled in our jurisprudence that there is an affirmative duty on owners and possessors of property: «to exercise reasonable care for the safety of persons reasonably expected to be on the premises * * * includ [ing] an obligation to protect against the risks of a dangerous condition existing on the premises, provided the landowner knows of, or by the exercise of reasonable care would have discovered, the dangerous condition.»

LISA's business lease AI tool (also known as a commercial lease) is perfect for Landlords, such as commercial property owners and business property entrepreneurs, who are looking to rent out a standalone property or a business property in a building with multiple commercial units, and business Tenants needing the ideal premises to trade and / or work from.

Property owners that allow the public onto their land are required to inspect for known dangers and to keep the premises safe for guests.

The owner of the premises or an employee knew about a dangerous condition but did nothing about it.

Premises liability law holds residential and business owners and managers legally responsible when they neglect to fulfill this duty of care and someone gets hurt or dies — especially when they did or should have known about the unsafe condition and did nothing to remedy the situation.

Regardless of who is liable, in order to establish a premises liability claim there must be some evidence of a defect or a dangerous condition on the property that caused the injury, and evidence that the property owner should have known of the dangerous condition.

The answer is that once the business owners and officers «delegate responsibility of their office premises to a freelancer» that person is no longer just a freelancer, that person is now also an agent of the business.

Moreover, it is implied that the property owner has posted warnings about any known defects on the premises, or otherwise taken measures to correct those defects.

Building owners, architects, builders and contractors for the design and construction of new facilities or the modification of existing facilities must understand the upcoming changes and know how to make premises accessible to people with a wide range of disabilities, including physical, sensory, learning, developmental and mental health.

Let's assume that the owner maintains insurance on the premises — you would hope so, but you never know.

The act requires that property owners or their agents in transactions involving homes built prior to 1978 disclose any known lead - based paint on the premises and provide a pamphlet describing the risks of on lead - based paint hazards to prospective buyers and renters.