Sentences with phrase «present debated what»

Rosenfeld points out that Norman Lewis (1909 - 79) participated in the landmark symposium organized in 1950 by Robert Motherwell and Lewis's friend Ad Reinhardt and held at Studio 35 in New York, where the artists present debated what to call the new art movement.

Rosenfeld points out that Norman Lewis (1909 — 79) participated in the landmark symposium organized in 1950 by Robert Motherwell and Lewis's friend Ad Reinhardt and held at Studio 35 in New York, where the artists present debated what to call the new art movement.

Not exact matches

No matter what your beliefs are, the most important take away from this debate in my mined is that both men «presented their arguments calmly and respectfully.

That is regardless of what is ever presented, as to be open to «debate».

It is in this context that academic freedom finds meaning — it supports a plurality of voices and traditions (past and present) when debating what vision of human life maximizes flourishing, which is the ongoing project of any society that seeks to perpetuate itself.

He said the debate was «a call for love», adding: «We are not telling people what to decide: but we do want the decisions that are made to be properly informed, and we don't want Down's Syndrome to be automatically presented as «bad news».»

A debate in which the thoughts are not expressed in the way in which they existed in the mind but in the speaking are so pointed that they may strike home in the sharpest way, and moreover without the men that are spoken to being regarded in any way present as persons; a conversation characterized by the need neither to communicate something, nor to learn something, nor to innuence someone, nor to come into connexion with someone, but solely by the desire to have one's own self - reliance confirmed by making the impression that is made, or if it has become unsteady to have it strengthened; a friendly chat in which each regards himself as absolute and legitimate and the other as relativized and questionable; a lovers» talk in which both partners alike enjoy their own glorious soul and their precious experience — what an underworld of faceless spectres of dialogue!

There was, of course, some internal debate as to what that philosophy should he or how it should be arrived at, but so long as proponents could claim something of the sanction of the scientific heritage, they could present their outlooks, not as one ideology among many, but as ones that were fair to everyone, since they were, if not wholly objective, at least more or less so.

But what I detect in it is the work of someone who was never all that interested in investigating the arguments on either side of the same - sex marriage debate; whose scant interest in it has now been fully exhausted, both intellectually and morally; and whose present conclusions hover in mid-air without anything to support them other than a wistful regret that he has lost a hoedown partner in a gay man who has come fairly unglued over the issue.

The NHL postseason has featured a heated debate over just what constitutes «exciting hockey» with the Western and Eastern conferences presenting two different approaches to success.

As a companion piece to Keith Cronin's excellent article on the use of PRP in which the both sides of the debate about PRP are presented, and based on a point - counterpoint debate conducted via email between the two experts whose views are expressed in Keith's piece, Dr. Nathan Mall, associate physician for the St. Louis Cardinals and Director for the St. Louis Center for Cartilage Restoration and RepairRegeneration Orthopedics, and Andrew M. Blecher MD, a Primary Care Sports Medicine physician and Medical Director of the Center for Rehabilitation Medicine at the Southern California Orthopedic Institute in Van Nuys, California, here are what Drs. Mall and Blecher have to say about the current state of the research on PRP.

«Saturday afternoon, Landry presented a seminar at City Market on the benefits of cloth diapers compared with disposable diapers, and while the issue is still open for debate over what is best for children and the environment, Landry's position was compelling for those in attendance.»

Indeed, although they begin their article with the statement, «Frequent overnights were significantly associated with attachment insecurity among infants,» which is what the headlines captured world - wide, they end their article with, «The present study certainly does not resolve debates about frequent overnights and the wellbeing of very young children.»

But if we want, as we must, to extend the debate to discuss what we should have, we can only do this if we are presented with models of what we might have.

There was not legislative text presented at the meeting as lawmakers continued to debate what changes would be made.

On our side we're at the mercy of what they present us to vote on... We debate as best we can, but there should be more of it, more bills.»

At present, there is a debate going on as to whether genetically modified (GM) crops are safe enough and what the long - term implications to the environment might be if they become widely planted.

These questions can spark a lively debate and thats exactly what happened last week when Intelligence Squared presented Do nt Eat Anything With A Face.

Delegates argued and debated the issue for more than a week in what was presented in the press as Pluto's fight for survival as a planet.

No matter what issues we'll be discussing, innovation will be the theme of the day, as online dating brands and key partners present, debate and network.

What kind of optics does that present to someone who is sitting on the fence, debating whether to buy this device, the Onyx device or wait until a next generation device is put out?

Another interesting debate presented by Mercy shows what bookstores will need to achieve to stay relevant in the rise of online vendors.

This second exhibition delves into the artist's notion of being an «immigrant,» how he or she responds to the present immigration debate as it is carried out in personal, public, and political spaces, and what approaches the artist takes, from the subtle and conceptual, to the blatantly political.

That illustrates my point, which is that present changes in surface temperature is not a good indicator of what we should expect in the future, and as such, it is not a great idea to make the debate about the observed ocean temperature.

While I expect my readings will lead me to confirm my conviction that AGW is a real and present danger, I am suspending that conclusion to see if I can have it bolstered empirically by following what I see as quality blogs on both sides of the debate.

My view is that the energy debate as presented is too weak to be proven without recourse to what I guess are exaggerated climate cost scenarios.

On no more than the basis that «climate change is occurring», moral philosophers tell us what is right, social historians invent lessons from history to make climate criminals in the present, science historians invent conspiracy theorists, and psychologists tell us how to apply distress to change public opinion, and why debate is just too risky to trust to the public.

you are supposing what can't be known, but it is most unlikely, on present evidence (reviewed, for example, in the Annals of Applied Statistics Statistics debate that I cited; see also the supporting online material) that the original MBH98, and the hockey stick that adorned the IPCC website for a few years, are now supported.

What he presented during those 13 minutes could, however serve as an introduction to interesting debate on this site as well.

This is not to say of course that co2 may not act in the way they prescribe - though i find that increasingly unlikely at present, but more to try to highlight the political aspects of this debate for what they are.

That speaks to me of scientific integrity, and it is refreshing to encounter it in the climate debate which is often dominated by what might be, at best, called «courtroom integrity» in which antagonists vie with each other to present watertight cases immune to argument and contradiction.

In Re W (children)(leave to remove)[2008] 2 FCR 420 Charles J suggested that such meetings, while under debate, should be subject to the following considerations: l the format, structure, content and purpose of the meeting; l the role of the judge; l the participation and presence of others in or at the meeting; l what is to be passed on to anyone not present or represented at the meeting; l how matters asserted by a child to the judge are to be tested; l whether anything that is not passed on to the parties can be taken into account by the judge; and l what explanation is to be given to the child before and after the meeting.

The debate here needs to move on from what is often being presented as a pure numbers game.

Taking responsibility What is lacking at present, in this most vital of debates, is a clear and — if at all possible — co-ordinated statement from our political leaders, on whom the responsibility for action primarily lies.

There is quite a debate as to what constitutes substance abuse, so here are the definitions of substance dependence and substance abuse paraphrased from the (DSMIV) Diagnostic and Statistical Manuel of Mental Disorders: Substance dependence is defined as when a person continues to use the substance despite significant substance related problems and a minimum of (3) of the following signs are present at any time during the same year.