Sentences with phrase «present the system does»

Although I eventually plan to talk about monetary arrangements that might make maintaining a steady flow of spending a lot easier than our present system does, for now I'm going to stick to discussing how the same goal might be achieved, at least in principle, in our present monetary system or, more precisely, in the system we had until the subprime crisis of 2008.

«Academy finances are a matter of public interest and the present system does not allow parents and the public to have confidence that financial decisions are being made for the benefit of pupils and that public money is being spent effectively and ethically.

US Bankruptcy Court Functions and The Present System Do you know what the US bankruptcy court functions and present system are?

At present the system doesn't take sufficient account of this.

Not exact matches

Morrow has a fork, too, but quickly forgets the cupcakes in front of him; he's preoccupied with explaining the new systems he needs to implement, his expansion plans, and his always - present question, «How do we make this faster?»

To present its automated grocery shopping system, Cassidy's team did a skit.

In Foursquare, for example, people can be noteworthy and attain badges within the system for doing such things as being the biggest regular at a certain place (What Norm and Cliff from «Cheers» would do with this...) and going to a venue in which a lot of Foursquare members of the opposite sex are present.

Today expectations from the presenting banking system are higher but there has been little done to address problems that would make transactions faster and cheaper.

The bottom line is that with neither inflation nor widespread leverage present in the system, I do not believe we have all the ingredients for a downturn in the economic cycle.

Kindly read my comments; Does not these verses that will follow speak of the Ancient Falling Systems and the Recent Past and Present Falling Systems?

It literally does not matter what the venue is those tactics will be present — Bible software development, blogs, IRC, convert to «x», where «x» can be any belief system.

That is so important and, if it doesn't, it is not good enough and, therefore, if you can't do it through the present system, then you have to find another that will be more reliable.»

Not only does a specific morphogenetic field influence the form of a system... but also the form of this system influences the morphogenetic field and through it becomes present to subsequent systems.

Does not these verses speak of the Ancient Falling Systems and the Recent Past and Present Falling Systems?

But Schwartz's subtitle and the predictable reactions to it do not quite exhaust what is present in the author's ambivalent «critique of the system of thought broadly known as monotheism.»

The late Willis Harmon, former President of the Institute of Noetic Science and a founder of the World Business Academy, a network of business people who believe that business has a positive role to play in reshaping the world, put it this way: there is «a growing awareness that the present global system doesn't work.

Did he present Zacchaeus with a huge and intricate system of theological speculation and ecclesiastical practice?

For an economic system to be responsible it is also necessary that it include adequate public health and safety regulations to ensure that industrial practices do not endanger employees or the present or future public welfare, and also that it provide adequate protection of the natural environment.

Does this mean that we have no choice but to acquiesce in the present system?

I am always willing to present my perspective (something I do on this blog) and talk with others who are still in that system, but I try not to judge or condemn them for where they are at.

when any voilence occured in the name of God i always wonder what the ppl will say / do [who did that voilence] if all of sudden that GOD Himself present!!!!!!!!!! but when i think abt the universe and out side of solar system, i always if its not for some SUPER NATURAL POWER how they can be in such way, even though that they are thr coz of physics, science etc...

In response, we then went on to give the standard free - will response: that the prima facie plausibility of this contention is deceiving, that while it may seem easy to identify specific aspects of our present system that it appears could be profitably removed with impunity, what the critic must do in this case is identify another entire determinate natural order that would neither imply the present evils, nor imply any similar new evils, but still imply the goods that make human life possible.

The present writer is nothing of a philosopher, he has not understood the System, does not know whether it actually exists, whether it is completed; already he has enough for his weak head in the thought of what a prodigious head everybody in our day must have, since everybody has such a prodigious thought.

When we speak of the double efficacy of the risen Christ as ideal and as objective datum for present becoming, we might do better to speak of a «triple efficacy» of the love of Christ, for that faith, love, and communion with God which are Christ's find innumerable, if only partial, echoes in the lives of individual believers and in that system of relationships which they comprise within the world.

The present system «gives» more to the rich than it does to those of moderate or low incomes.

Although we differ on at least one point in the interpretation of Whitehead's philosophy (he holds the system to require that God acts efficiently by mediating to present events finite efficient causes derived from the past), I do not see how his God acts coercively in any of the senses outlined in the previous chapter.

He is the souce of morality, but he doesn't «conform to» a moral system (as the online dictionary presents as one of the defs of morality).

The basic structure that makes these dominant occasions possible emerged with the development of the central nervous system in animals, and where this structure is present, it is reasonable, as Thorpe does, to posit consciousness as present to some degree.

And... we ought... to eulogize it and then bury it... In other words, the most missionary service a missionary under the present system can do today in Asia is to go home.

At present Japan, the Philippines and Hong Kong are prominent examples where this power is vested in the ordinary courts, as is more commonly done in common law systems.

The present study was primarily interested in assessing consumers» ability to use a variety of front - of - pack labelling systems; therefore participants did not have access to other information that might also be used when selecting foods.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

A 4 -3-3 system is favoured by Barca, Real Madrid and Man City and Bayern, the top four teams in Europe.It suits the attacking philosophy of Arsene Wenger which is to his credit.Unfortunately we do not have the top quality defenders these teams have nor a dominant DM.Nevertheless it is the best system for our current team which is top heavy in attacking midfielders hence the need to play Ozil and Mik in wide positions.In my opinion the most balanced central midfield would consist of Elneny, Ramsay and Wilshere.Elneny was first class against Watford yet was left out against an average Milan side to accommodate the ever present Xhaka who will no doubt feature against CSK.

Unfortunately, given the restrictions presented by the current system, his chances of impressing again as he did last season are massively reduced and I wouldn't be surprised to see him go at the end of this season.

If you choose to drink, it's best to do it right after nursing or pumping because it takes 2 - 3 hours for 1 drink to leave your system and not be present in breast milk.

Even if one or two + aspects of it are not present or working correctly the vast majority of humans do still have a component of their immune system that is «natural».

You don't want rush this transition because your baby's digestive system needs time to adapt to the new proteins and other nutrients present in fluid milk.

Don't tell me that the present system isn't just as fucked up?

Many more did not necessarily embrace such ideas, but saw its legacy as useful for present purposes and one that could be applied in their opposition to state power and the existing system.

Well, historically we've presented our activists (about 17,000 — a relatively small list) with a pre-written message in our grassroots action system, so that all they have to do is push a button to attach their name to it and send it to the relevant decision - maker (s).

Support can only grow in strength as time goes on (assuming the younger voters don't change views as they age), especially as the deficiencies in the present system are continually laid bare.

Britain could also, building on a recent increase in Anglo - French defence cooperation, push for a system in which France and Britain jointly provide a CASD, rather than duplicating each other's efforts (and costs) as they do at present.

The governor would have up to 30 days to present a budget amendment that spells out the details of a teacher - rating system, something he promises to do if the unions don't sign on.

«Throw as much mud as you can, don't let the issue be discussed openly and frighten the public over the next three weeks into voting to preserve the power the present first - past - the - post system has given you.

The process of changing the party funding regime should focus not on whether politicians are all corrupt and self - serving (the vast majority are not), or on whether state funding is less corrupt, but on the challenges that the proposed system presents, or does not address — such as the revolving door.

WASHINGTON — Congressman Sean Patrick Maloney (D - NY18) supports immigration reform, calling the present system «a mess,» but he does not support amnesty for illegal aliens.

«So what happened to the system after May 29,2015 that this present government took over?How did we get to this level of inconclusive and questionable elections in which the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and security agencies appear to have become part of the ruling party?»

The debate during the most recent board meeting left both sides of the often - feuding board factions united that the present system isn't functioning since it's not clear whether the grants are working since there don't seem to be solid goals.

Utter rubbish, Labour did quite well in the Blair years under FPTP when they had an electable leader, now it has a poor leader the system will punish it, trying to introduce electoral reform will not help it sneak through the back door, indeed on present polling a Tory - UKIP deal would be just as likely as a Labour - LD - SNP - Green one!

Mayor Bill de Blasio said that if the Metropolitan Transportation Authority doesn't fix the problems plaguing New York City's subway system, he'd prefer that the city take over responsibility of it — and called on both the MTA and Gov. Andrew Cuomo to present a plan to the city to address the «mounting» delays, disruptions and public complaints.