Not exact matches
I would
present it
in such a way that they understand that this is what makes you happier, able to function on the
task at hand better, and not that it's a deal breaker.
It's true that focusing on the
present helps you get
tasks done faster, but working on your next day's to - do lists will help
in two ways: First, you'll help your future self by setting a prioritized list of items
in advance, and second, you'll be clearing your mind of
tasks you don't need to worry about today.
The instability and chaos
present in a post disaster zone makes it very difficult to prioritize
tasks due to the constant storm of emergencies that happen every day.
For me, it's important to be
present in the moment while I'm trying to focus on a particular
task and sometimes that means blocking out all of the other noise for a bit.»
For those not familiar with the concept, a case competition is an event
in which teams of business students (typically four per team) are
presented with business scenarios and
tasked with giving a presentation, recommending to a panel of judges (playing the role of a board of directors) how the company should deal with the crisis.
A Brainstorm TECH
task force of leading educators, technologists, entrepreneurs, philanthropists, and investors will
present their recommendations for addressing the persistent gap between the digital innovations
in K — 12 education and what's actually available to the vast majority of children.
While Evangelicals greatly respect the way
in which the Catholic Church has defended many historic Christian teachings against relativizing and secularizing trends, and recognize the role of the
present pontiff
in that important
task today, they believe that some aspects of Catholic doctrine are not biblically warranted, and they do not accept any claims of infallibility made for the magisterial teachings of popes or church councils.
Being fully
present in the
task at hand, other
tasks, other people and other obligations can wait.
Thus,
in the terms
in which I have so far
presented the theory, the attribution of temporality to God has the great advantage of appearing to be a perfectly reasonable next step
in the positive
task of constructing and working out the implications of a theory of experience.
We may be led to undertake specific
tasks and missions
in this life, but much of what we are called to do has more to do with attitude and heart (Spirit) when we are
presented with people and situations.
It is the
task of the
present generation to provide training
in the essentials of Islam, to know Islam deeply, for out of that knowledge of the straight path of Islam will come the unity of belief and practice which has been revealed to mankind
in the Qur» an and the Sunnah.
I no longer have to represent my going to God as a departure from time and history.42
In fact, to attain God as the Absolute Future who is also the Fullness of Time, I must perforce be occupied with the present and the tasks of the present, for it is only in and through the present that I can advance into the futur
In fact, to attain God as the Absolute Future who is also the Fullness of Time, I must perforce be occupied with the
present and the
tasks of the
present, for it is only
in and through the present that I can advance into the futur
in and through the
present that I can advance into the future.
At the
present time, then, the
task is to broaden the scope and meaning of linguistic analysis so that it can be of service to religious language and,
in our particular case, to God - language.
Despite these substantial issues, the common
task of the systems approach and process metaphysics is that of «describing the
present order of the world
in terms of principles which are the special exemplification of the most general» (MN 124).
In the face of both thinkers» categorical denial that there is any such thing as a substantial self which endures throughout the constant process of transition, our task at hand will be to present their developmental insights in a language and style which truly captures the dynamic thrust of their view
In the face of both thinkers» categorical denial that there is any such thing as a substantial self which endures throughout the constant process of transition, our
task at hand will be to
present their developmental insights
in a language and style which truly captures the dynamic thrust of their view
in a language and style which truly captures the dynamic thrust of their views.
The question I will address is whether speculation about what Jesus was
in himself, especially how he was related to God (meaning how God was
present in him), is an essential or at least important
task for Christian theology.
A fifth dimension of the theological
task is to
present theological insights
in ways that captivate the human imagination and emotions, not simply the intellect.
Whether or not it is capable of this
task was the problem
presented in the last section.
But when I have seen this, my next
task is to let the book's message universalize itself
in my mind as God's own teaching or doctrine (to use the word that Calvin loved) now addressed to humankind
in general and to me
in particular within the frame of reality created by the death, resurrection, and
present dominion of Jesus Christ.
A possible real connection with the animal kingdom is itself of relatively little theological importance, for anything
in it that would be important for the theological interpretation of human life
in the
present, can also be known without it, that is to say, the vulnerability of man
in face of the powers of this earth, man's temptation to see himself from the point of view of his animality, his liability to death, man's dynamic orientation and
task of developing to his perfection from below upwards, beyond his beginnings.
And one of the great
tasks of all true education, social reform, and religion combined, is so to
present to men and make possible for men those aims
in life which are worth serving, that men may choose them, love them, become patriots for them, organize their lives around them, and so harness all their fiery energies to the service of the light.
And this
task is not only developing systematically
in the
present, it has done so historically throughout the past.
Although accurate historical dating can at times be of exegetical significance, the crucial interpretive
task lies
in determining the narrative function to which such texts have been assigned, rather than
in supplying a reconstructed setting apart from its
present literary (canonical) context.
I have introduced him to the reader because
in one of his essays, prepared for a volume of which I was an editor, he dealt with the
task of preaching; and
in that essay he used a phrase which is relevant to our
present discussion.
Because we ministers rightly believe that involvement
in the reconciling process is a central
task, we are more reluctant than most people to step back when, at least for the time being, the initial conditions for that process are not
present.
An appraisal of the
present situation with its many conflicting tendencies should be facilitated by the categories and the perspective developed
in this book, but the
task remains to be performed.
An all - too - common retroactive dismissal of the leaving pastor's «calling» (i.e. that s / he never really had a calling because one can't / shouldn't be able to leave a «true» calling) is salt
in the wounds and complicates emotional struggle of the existential angst of the
present in reason 8 with an additional
task of trying to defend one's historical existence, even if the defense is confined to an internal self re-assurance.
In this case the will does not constantly become concrete in the same degree that it is abstract, in such a way that the more it is infinitized in purpose and resolution, the more present and contemporaneous with itself does it become in the small part of the task which can be realized at once, so that in being infinitized it returns in the strictest sense to its self, so that what is farthest from itself (when it is most infinitized in purpose and resolution) is in the same instant nearest to itself in accomplishing the infinitely small part of the task which can be done even today, even at this hour, even at this instan
In this case the will does not constantly become concrete
in the same degree that it is abstract, in such a way that the more it is infinitized in purpose and resolution, the more present and contemporaneous with itself does it become in the small part of the task which can be realized at once, so that in being infinitized it returns in the strictest sense to its self, so that what is farthest from itself (when it is most infinitized in purpose and resolution) is in the same instant nearest to itself in accomplishing the infinitely small part of the task which can be done even today, even at this hour, even at this instan
in the same degree that it is abstract,
in such a way that the more it is infinitized in purpose and resolution, the more present and contemporaneous with itself does it become in the small part of the task which can be realized at once, so that in being infinitized it returns in the strictest sense to its self, so that what is farthest from itself (when it is most infinitized in purpose and resolution) is in the same instant nearest to itself in accomplishing the infinitely small part of the task which can be done even today, even at this hour, even at this instan
in such a way that the more it is infinitized
in purpose and resolution, the more present and contemporaneous with itself does it become in the small part of the task which can be realized at once, so that in being infinitized it returns in the strictest sense to its self, so that what is farthest from itself (when it is most infinitized in purpose and resolution) is in the same instant nearest to itself in accomplishing the infinitely small part of the task which can be done even today, even at this hour, even at this instan
in purpose and resolution, the more
present and contemporaneous with itself does it become
in the small part of the task which can be realized at once, so that in being infinitized it returns in the strictest sense to its self, so that what is farthest from itself (when it is most infinitized in purpose and resolution) is in the same instant nearest to itself in accomplishing the infinitely small part of the task which can be done even today, even at this hour, even at this instan
in the small part of the
task which can be realized at once, so that
in being infinitized it returns in the strictest sense to its self, so that what is farthest from itself (when it is most infinitized in purpose and resolution) is in the same instant nearest to itself in accomplishing the infinitely small part of the task which can be done even today, even at this hour, even at this instan
in being infinitized it returns
in the strictest sense to its self, so that what is farthest from itself (when it is most infinitized in purpose and resolution) is in the same instant nearest to itself in accomplishing the infinitely small part of the task which can be done even today, even at this hour, even at this instan
in the strictest sense to its self, so that what is farthest from itself (when it is most infinitized
in purpose and resolution) is in the same instant nearest to itself in accomplishing the infinitely small part of the task which can be done even today, even at this hour, even at this instan
in purpose and resolution) is
in the same instant nearest to itself in accomplishing the infinitely small part of the task which can be done even today, even at this hour, even at this instan
in the same instant nearest to itself
in accomplishing the infinitely small part of the task which can be done even today, even at this hour, even at this instan
in accomplishing the infinitely small part of the
task which can be done even today, even at this hour, even at this instant.
Lyle Schaller writes about the importance of recognizing certain ministerial
tasks as «winners» and others as «losers»
in The Multiple Staff and the Larger Church, «Winners» are the
tasks that lead people to sign up for ordained ministry: preaching, presiding over sacraments, being
present at key life transitions such as weddings and funerals —
in other words, the prominent, visible and generally rewarding parts of ministry.
Assuming the adequacy of this sketch of Hartshorne's understanding of God, the
present task is to examine his conclusions
in light of the Christian's confession of Jesus Christ.
In these terms, the proposition that Jesus lives on subjectively is the supreme instance of some more general proposition as to individual survival after death: to reach a decision as to this supreme instance one would first have to investigate the general concept of resurrection, which lies beyond our
present task.25 It must here suffice to answer that these proposals neither affirm nor deny the doctrine that both Jesus and the «souls of the righteous» live on subjectively.
In the same essay, Davison puts forward the case for continuing to use theological language, even when it might be strange, because «it is the
task of apologetics to make things clear and on other occasions it is the
task of apologetics to cut through the vapid familiarity of our time and
present something unfamiliar, glorious and true».
Efficient causality is the way
in which the past persists into the
present, and the
task of scientific analysis is to discover whatever regularity exists
in this transfer from past to
present.
Man as we know him today, man of metaphysics, of abstract thought, the creator of his own environment, the space - traveller, the moulder of himself, the man of God and of grace and of the promise of eternal life, precisely this man who is radically distinct from any animal and who at the moment of man's origin, though perhaps very slowly, took a path which led him so far away from all that is merely animal, yet
in such a fashion that he carried with him the whole inheritance of his biological pre-history into these realms of his existence remote from the animals, was there when man began to exist.18 And what now is historically and externally manifest, was then
present as a
task and as an active potentiality.
The
task of the
present generation appears to lie
in the liberation of the church from its bondage to a corrupt civilization.
It is
in this spirit that this
present work is offered, as one man's contribution to the ever - continuing
task of research into the teaching of Jesus.
The difference
in settings is important because the Church faced the
task of taking the words of Jesus to a particular audience and
presenting them as the word of the Lord
in a new situation.2 It took both wisdom and courage for the Church to assume this awesome burden of interpreting, but to have failed to do so out of an overwhelming reverence for quotations from Jesus would have ended the work Jesus began.
Although we can be surer of the fact of the greatness than of the qualities of character
in which it consisted, we can go some distance
in identifying those qualities, and that is the
task we have set ourselves
in the
present chapter.
The basic psychoanalytic aim — to provide opportunities to complete
in a healthier relationship the unfinished growth
tasks from the past which continue to distort the
present — is still viable and important.
We are, then, resident
in this world, with the
task of making it, so far as may be, a replica of the perfect justice and utter charity of our homeland, but not surprised nor
in despair when the work can not be brought to complete fulfillment because the conditions of our
present place of residence do not permit, or our selfishness and pride interfere.
As soon as God is
present, each man
in the presence of God has the
task of paying attention to himself.
For if the theological
task can be defined
in terms of facing the tension between the old and the new, then it is only to be expected that both the speed and the extent of the change,
in which we are at
present all caught up, will inevitably bring changes
in theological expression greater than at any earlier period
in Christian history.
Would it not, therefore, be an historian's
task (much as it may shock Humean sensibilities) to
present history
in such terms?
To live «
in the moment» means to be gracefully
present to the simplest and most complex joys and
tasks.
Its
task would be, not first of all to look back to find the original rope, but, rather,
in the light and power of the Holy Spirit to gather both past and
present into a creative Christian future
in order to twist together again the various strands into a firmly spliced rope.
Thus,
in our
present predicament perhaps the most fundamental of all moral
tasks is the abolition of war.
Hence, the
task for contemporary Whiteheadians is to make whatever modest revisions are needed
in that scheme so as to justify Whitehead's own non-systematic vision of God
in dynamic interrelationship with the world as
presented in the final pages of Process and Reality.
Hence the whole revelation and gift of God to man once and for all
in Christ must be apprehended ever anew
in each successive
task and danger which confronts us
in this
present age.
Just because conduct is not determined by unified intelligible basic principles, but is regulated by the formal authority of the Law, the
task of the scribe is to «make a fence around the Torah,» that is, by endless acute deductions from Scripture to find rules for cases not foreseen
in the Law, which nevertheless confront men
in their
present life.
For him the avenue to religious truth lay
in present experience and, at least during the earlier years, «he dismissed historical study of the faith as having no resources for the
present task».