In
the present times men likes independent and confident women who do not pester them to take care of them.
Not exact matches
They have used this revised doctrine of God to argue for the subordination of women to
men in the
present, in a manner that has at
times had terrible pastoral consequences.
For over 30 yrs one
man has
presented a much different & positive take on the happenings of the
time.
satans aim was to stop the fulfillment of the seed that would crush satan underfoot.This hybrid between the angels and
man created giants abominations in Gods eyes.They also were a threat to Gods people as can be seen by the giants in the land of caanan after the flood.If we agree on that then there is no way that Eve would have had intercourse with satan [false doctrine of the seed of satan -RCB- because the blood lines were still untainted by angelic beings or satan at the
time of Noah maybe that is also why the genealogy of Christ is well
presented with no surprises apart from Hagar and Ruth these two were gentiles that shows Gods mercy grace was always there to all nations he accepts people by faith not by race.Prior to the flood the mixing of the angels and
man must have been widespread after the flood these beings were
present but in limited numbers and God told his people to destroy them as they were abominations but they were a threat to Gods people.It would be interesting to hear what the rabbis had to say on this matter as i would think the stories would have been past down from generation to the next.Especially regarding the flood.God promised he would never flood the earth again but a
time is coming when the earth will be judged not by flood but by fire Jesus is our ark and we are safe in him.brentnz
She had apparently got to the point where she honestly did not know that a child is the natural fruit of a union between a
man and a woman: in her understanding «sex» is something done for pleasure, according to one's desires, whether lesbian or homosexual or whatever, and procreation an entirely different matter connected with options
presented at various
times, possibly involving in - vitro fertilization and test - tubes.
That is why God became
man in Jesus Christ — and that is why Jesus continues to be
present for all
time in his Church.
His range of experience was restricted by the kind of
man he was; and this in itself raises certain difficulties if he is held up as an example to all human beings everywhere and at all
times, for it is at least in some measure unreal to
present a first - century Galilean as a model for the conduct of Western or African or Asian
men in a twentieth - century industrial society.
You must remember the bible was put together by
man and scripts were hand - picked based on those
time morals at that
present time.
How can someone 2,800 years ago, write about a
Man who lived 2,000 years ago, so precisely; and we, in
present times, can 100 % identify who he was writing about?
Others see him
presented to the reader as the Son of
man, who will return at the end of
time to judge everyone for his or her deeds (Meier).
To this mythology belongs the expectation of the end of the world as occurring in
time, the expectation which in the contemporary situation of Jesus is the natural expression of his conviction that even in the
present man stands in the crisis of decision, that the
present is for him the last hour.
actually you do nt have to prove the many deities or Gods that they really exist, because they really had existed in their
times, They are part of the evolutionary process for us humans to transcend to higher consciousness.To simplify the analogy, when we were young and we are in the lower grade school, we were taught simple subjects not advance literatures but simple stories even mythicals, The same with religion, thousands of years ago when there was no science yet, primitive people had a religion, of course
man made faiths to conform with their state of mind or intellect.But later atfter thousands of years we evolve into a more educated people and so new concept of God again was
presented to them, another
man made concept, and this go on and on, until a few thiousand years ago.monotheism, Judaism, christianity, islam, buddhism, etc also evolved, But with the accelerated evolution, these faith again is threatend with obsolesencs because of of scientific developments and education.In panthroteistic faith, the future religion needs to conform to evolutionary process, This proves that God is always there guiding the change.And it his will that made this a reality in history since the begining of the universe 13 billion years ago, and this will continue to exist until He will completely fulfill His will to infinity, Thats PANTHROTHEISM, the futue,
man made religion under His guidance through scientifiic evoluition after the Bi Bang
If we allow Blake's apocalyptic vision to stand witness to a radical Christian faith, there are at least seven points from within this perspective at which we can discern the uniqueness of Christianity: (1) a realization of the centrality of the fall and of the totality of fallenness throughout the cosmos; (2) the fall in this sense can not be known as a negative or finally illusory reality, for it is a process or movement that is absolutely real while yet being paradoxically identical with the process of redemption; and this because (3) faith, in its Christian expression, must finally know the cosmos as a kenotic and historical process of the Godhead's becoming incarnate in the concrete contingency of
time and space; (4) insofar as this kenotic process becomes consummated in death, Christianity must celebrate death as the path to regeneration; (5) so likewise the ultimate salvation that will be effected by the triumph of the Kingdom of God can take place only through a final cosmic reversal; (6) nevertheless, the future Eschaton that is promised by Christianity is not a repetition of the primordial beginning, but is a new and final paradise in which God will have become all in all; and (7) faith, in this apocalyptic sense, knows that God's Kingdom is already dawning, that it is
present in the words and person of Jesus, and that only Jesus is the «Universal Humanity,» the final coming together of God and
man.
To the extent that the
man - made setting of
man's life and the setting which was naturally antecedent to human freedom are specifically different, the latter being characteristic of earlier
times and the former of the
present, we are now living in a setting which almost in its very essence is more complicated and intractable and inaccessible to the understanding of the individual than was ever the case before.
The characteristic features of the
present age could of course be detected in former
times as faint traces, so to speak, because
man was always to some degree the inventor and active manipulator of his own situation and the creator of himself.
Now restrains» that is what we call the
present tense which means that the clear statement of scripture is that both the
man of iniquity and the restrainer were
present at the
time of Paul's writing.
So in John 20 he
presents it to
man for the first
time since the fall.
Diodorus writes that, «For as regards the magnitude of the deeds which he accomplished it is generally agreed that Heracles has been handed down as one who surpassed all
men of whom memory from the beginning of
time has brought down an account; consequently it is a difficult attainment to report each one of his deeds in a worthy manner and to
present a record which shall be on a level with labours so great, the magnitude of which won for him the prize of immortality.»
Your Majesty, when we compare the
present life of
man on earth with that
time of which we have no knowledge, it seems to me like the swift flight of a single sparrow through the banqueting - hall where you are sitting at dinner on a winter's day with your thanes and counsellors.
God is not only disclosed in him, nor is revelation confined to «biblical
times»; but Jesus is the supreme disclosure which opens my eyes to God in the
present, and while remaining a
man who lived in a particular historical situation, he will always be the unique focus of my perception of and response to God.
By dividing these two numbers we find that the chance that any
man might have lived down to the
present time and fulfilled all eight prophecies is 1 in 1017.
«But what we are here today to assert is that in the case of women in England at the
present time, there is no reason for any exceptional treatment which does not also exist for the corresponding class of
men.
Just the same chance that the prophets would have had of writing these eight prophecies and having them all come true in any one
man, from their day to the
present time, providing they wrote using their own wisdom.
In the
present text of this narrative, Moses goes up and down Mount Sinai no less than three
times, and for a
man reputed in the biblical tradition to be in his eighties, that is no small chore.
As it becomes aware of the specific form in which ultimate human problems
present themselves in our own
time, the ministry, and therewith the schools that prepare
men for it, begin to understand more sharply what the pastoral function is, in what language the gospel speaks to this need, and what form the Church must take in serving such
men in such a
time.
But this question remains closely bound to reality; it is concerned with
man in his
present - day form, with
man in our
time.
Part of the answer is that these ancient events are moments in a living process which includes also the existence of the church at the
present day; and another part is that, as Christians believe, in these events of ancient
time God was at work among
men, and it is from his action in history rather than from abstract arguments that we learn what God is like, and what are the principles on which he deals with
men, now as always.
Spelled out in a lengthy lead editorial entitled «Evangelicals in the Social Struggle,» as well as in books such as Aspects of Christian Social Ethics, Henry's understanding of Christian social responsibility stressed (a) society's need for the spiritual regeneration of all
men and women, (b) an interim social program of humanitarian care, ethical proclamation, and personal, structural application, and (c) a theory of limited government centering on certain «freedom rights,» e. g., the rights to public property, free speech, and so on.18 Though the shape of this social ethic thus closely parallels that of the
present editorial position of Moody Monthly, it must be distinguished from its counterpart by the
time period involved (it pushed others like Moody Monthly into a more active involvement in the social arena), by the intensity of its commitment to social responsibility, by the sophistication of its insight into political theory and practice, and by its willingness to offer structural critique on the American political system.
But at this
present time I can not affirm a difference in kind between Jesus and other
men; indeed I find important religious reasons for wishing to deny this.
According to Bultmann, any attempt at the
present time to understand and express the Christian message must realize that the theological propositions of the New Testament are not understood by modern
man because they reflect a mythological picture of the world that we today can not share.1
Johnson notes that in a Gallup poll, 44 percent of respondents agree that «God created
man pretty much in his
present form at one
time within the last 10,000 years.»
Yet the most remarkable thing about the whole sorry saga, from the Jakes business until now, has been the silence of many of the
men who
present themselves as the leaders of the movement and who were happy at one
time to benefit from Mark Driscoll's reputation and influence.
According to a 1982 Gallup poll aimed at measuring nationwide opinion, 44 percent of respondents agreed with the statement that «God created
man pretty much in his
present form at one
time within the last 10,000 years.»
Ok, yes we believe in Islam that
man was taller than specified here and that
man is becoming less in tall from generation to another... but which I doubt most is that from Adam
time to
present time is only 6000 years???
Let
men be of good heart then, for Christ's religion will show itself, and at this
present time, to be no failure, for it has within itself the power to bring up from its vast treasury, new things and old for the light and the comfort of
men of good will.
Nevertheless, what does finally come about, given the
present rate of accelerating knowledge and techniques, will find us in a situation in which
man can know and do what in former
times was the privilege of the gods.
At this
present time, in a period of decline in Christian faith and morals which is still unchecked, still sweeping even lower, it remains true that the teachings given
men by Christ, although whittled away and progressively abandoned, still preserve a better level of charity, justice, and chastity in human affairs throughout Christendom than prevails in those regions where the name of Christ has hardly entered, or where it is bitterly persecuted.
These biographical notes on the life of David acknowledge and illustrate David's moral ambivalence and even duplicity, and yet at the same
time present a
man who, as the sons of
men go, is superior not only in the qualities of winsomeness and shrewdness, but also in the solid virtues that issue from a dominant integrity.
None of these features belonged to any previous conception of the Messiah in the original sense of that term, although the
present waiting in Heaven for the
time of his manifestation conformed to the pattern associated, as we have seen, with the supernatural Son of
Man.
Writers of the Talmud use Γενεὰ for race of
men or combine it with οὐ μὴ παρέλθῃ to be the greater part of a generation which would
time it with 70AD fall of the Temple and those Jews
present.
Every manifestation of the Son of
Man in
time and space is
presented to my notitia in such a way that he may nevertheless remain concealed: It is then impossible to make the assent of Thomas: «My Lord and my God» (John 20:29).
Gregory concluded Book One of his Pastoral Care with a remarkable exegesis of a curious passage found in Leviticus 21: The Lord spoke to Moses and said, speak to Aaron in these words: No
man among your descendants for all
time who has any physical defect shall come and
present the food of his God.
This may well be because it was actually written and promulgated (and Islam created as a pan-Arabic religion) in its
present form some
time after the
man Mohammed lived and died, but Muslims get round the issue by saying that the real Quran is eternal.
But
man in fact does not live in an eternal
present; his existence is bound by
time and history.
The fullness of the reality
present in such past events as the Incarnation and the Crucifixion is available for Christian
men living in our
present time.
Of special importance for world democracy at the
present time is the decisive rejection of the white
man's dominance of the world, as people of every shade of skin assume places of leadership in the councils of the nations.
If such a group is an ongoing one it is also a good idea for the women and the
men to meet in separate groups from
time to
time, since women and
men, at our
present stage of evolution, always behave differently in the presence of the other sex.
To the
man who is faced with the emptiness, the vacuity, and the terror of our
time, Gnosticism must
present the supreme temptation.
Here we have a profound critique of our popular ideas about
time, as Luther saw when he said that in the sight of God the whole history of
man from Adam down to the
present moment happened «as it were but yesterday».
But still the books were aiming at the majority of simple minded to understand... and am sure if God wanted to mention airplanes at that early
time he would have mentioned it as flock of birds to reach the mentality of
men then.but it is our turn now to translate it scientifically as to possibility with our
present knowldge.