The alarmists» approach for some years has been to publicly deride the climate skeptics rather than
present valid arguments for their so - called «consensus science.»
In the breastfeeding versus formula feeding debate, both sides
present valid arguments for the pros, and both sides have their downfalls.
It is not enough to
present a valid argument which supports the thesis statement while writing argumentative persuasive essay.
Not exact matches
The
arguments presented by the creation institute in this regard are
valid but they never went about proving their claim.
If I'm
presented with an
argument that is
valid and makes sense then I will change my mind.
The most considerable difference is that
argument should
present a claim supported by reasoning and evidence which persuades your reader that the thesis of your essay writing is a
valid one.
In my mind, one of the key scientific issues is whether the Clement / Cane
argument for an increased SST gradient is
valid, is detectable in the data, and (if
valid) is
present in the models.
Nebuchadnezzar
presented a totally
valid argument and it's refuted claiming that he doesn't understand the issue.
Maybe there is a
valid reason for you to advocate because of your concern about a lack of balance, but: (1), I question the criteria you are using to measure that imbalance, and (2) as you become an advocate, you drift away from the science, and you drift away from the first order priority of
presenting as much information as is reasonable, objectively, before laying out the
argument for your conclusions.
The natural cynacism that I have towards the «establishment» is a result of my experience in other cases — where, I now judge, I was being «sold to» rather than being
presented with all of the facts — including
valid arguments for the opposing view which may, at the very least, have suggested less certainty.
The point of this remark is that no one up to
present date has conducted any analysis of this sort on the ice core data, therefore my assertion that currently «you have no data of adequate quality from past proxies, so the
argument of «unprecedented» growth can not be used» is perfectly
valid and is true.
Monsanto's quiet monopoly over the seed industry, and as a result the world's food supply,
presents the most
valid argument against any sort of genetic modification.
While investors tend to embrace the decentralization
present with cryptocurrencies and blockchain, there's a
valid argument that Ripple is itself not decentralized.
It is a
valid argument, as the Pixel smartphones constitute a very small piece of the pie, at least at
present.
And if there are scientifically
valid arguments on both sides of a controversial topic, we
present both sides so that people can make their own decisions.