Or has everything sped up to a new climate cycle that goes beyond the worst case scenarios
presented by computer models?
Not exact matches
Computer models can give a good estimate of mantle flow and crustal uplift, he said, and GNET's mission is to make those
models better
by providing direct observations of
present - day crustal motion.
When the researchers
presented a blue house surrounded
by a combination of red houses and blue faces, both the
computer model and people responded more slowly.
For this solo exhibition, Mika Tajima
presents an illuminated space that responds to the sentiment of future human expressions
modeled by computer algorithms.
* S: (n) analogy (an inference that if things agree in some respects they probably agree in others) * S: (n) analogy (drawing a comparison in order to show a similarity in some respect) «the operation of a
computer presents and interesting analogy to the working of the brain»; «the
models show
by analogy how matter is built up» * S: (n) doctrine of analogy, analogy (the religious belief that between creature and creator no similarity can be found so great but that the dissimilarity is always greater; language can point in the right direction but any analogy between God and humans will always be inadequate)»
«
Present cooling was NOT predicted
by the alarmists»
computer models, and has come as an embarrassment to them» — July 1, 2009
Scientists Write Open Letter to Congress: «Earth has been cooling for ten years» — «
Present cooling was NOT predicted
by the alarmists»
computer models, and has come as an embarrassment to them» — July 1, 2009
Researchers from New York University, McGill University and Pennsylvania State University found that the projected melting of Antarctic ice may be delayed or influenced
by two things that are most often disregarded in
present computer simulation
models: ice gravity and Earth structure variations.
The SCC is a loosey - goosey
computer model result that attempts to determine the
present value of future damages that result from climate change caused
by pernicious economic activity.
Gilliland (1982b); Madden and Ramanathan (1980) studied the climate «noise» in comparison with warming predicted
by various
computer models and concluded the effect «should be detectable anytime from the
present to about the year 2000,» p. 767.
But in the understanding that
computer models can not
model the thousands of imponderable details thrown up
by semi chaotic weather patterns and should not
presented as fact for a theory.
Oddly, polar bear biologists chose to dispel the serious concerns over invasive research
by presenting the outputs of
computer models.