Another nice aspect of the Google Book app is the night reading mode, which
presents the text in inverted white letters against a black background.
The study's author, Pradeep Ramulu, MD, speculates that «If the optimal [text / lighting configuration] for reading in the context of glaucoma could be determined, it would be easy to create an application to
present text in this manner as part of a commercial device, such as an iPad or Kindle ``.
Open ePub 3, launched by the IDPF at this year's BookExpo America / IDPF Conference, was hailed as a vital innovation to the industry due in large part to its ability to
present text in a variety of international language formats that do not read left - to - right, such as Japanese.
That is why spend some of your time and write the draft for your macroeconomics research paper in order to simplify the process of writing and in order to help remember anything and be able to
present a text in a logical and smooth way.
And don't worry about your formatting options; Word allows you to
present your text in a way that matches your exact style.
Not exact matches
«Make sure that you're really
present in a moment, you're not that person who's
texting or glancing at your phone at the dinner table.
In a closing statement on Thursday, Assistant U.S. Attorney Eun Young Choi reviewed numerous
text messages, emails and voice recordings
presented to jurors during the four - week trial, which she said proved that Lebedev and Gross acted with «corrupt intent.»
What your site actually contains, what keyword and keyword phrases are
present in your
text and how often they appear.
It was with these subjects
in mind that he cleverly and deliberately had the book formatted to be the same size and shape of an iPad Air, which changed how he wrote and
presented the
text and page layout.
This
text is often
presented in a larger and stronger font than other
text on the page.
On that day, we
presented exactly the following commentary and chart of UNG (
presented in blue
text):
Fossil abundance versus geologic period diagrams should be shown for all life forms discussed
in the
text or
presented in tree of life or cladogram interpretations.
Knowing that Adam and Eve are
present in the Genesis doesn't really give critical understanding of the
text.
All of these ironies, and more, are
presented in a
text of great subtlety and learning, almost overrich
in citations and nuance - perhaps the truest tribute to this remarkable city.
The analysis of these
texts will be much shorter than the analysis of the flood
in Genesis 6 — 8 because explaining all the
texts in detail would simply mean that many of the same arguments and ideas
presented as an explanation for one
text would simply be repeated
in an explanation for a different
text.
All that Bergson asserts — and we shall see that
in many of his
texts Whitehead implicitly adopts the same view — is that this difference, real as it is, is nevertheless only that of degree, not that of nature, for one simple reason: that the past is always totally immanent
in the
present, even though
in different degrees of vividness.
The historical reality of the flood and the spiritual truth that it reveals are both
present in this
text, and both shed light on what occurred
in the flood event.
How is this evident since the community seems not to be
present in the
text?
Vindicating the Vixens looks at female characters
in the Bible who have often been judged, condemned, marginalized, ignored, or ridiculed, and shows how these women are actually
presented by the
text as heroes to emulate or examples to be followed.
The
present essay is written
in two tracks: the central argument, which appears as the
text, and the Scholarly discussion, especially as regards issues pertinent to the Annecy meeting, which appears as the endnotes.
In fact, the present text of Matthew's gospel, in many passages, is almost word for word the same as Mark's gospel, which was written in Gree
In fact, the
present text of Matthew's gospel,
in many passages, is almost word for word the same as Mark's gospel, which was written in Gree
in many passages, is almost word for word the same as Mark's gospel, which was written
in Gree
in Greek.
I don't want to get too lost
in the technical weeds on this
text, which would be easy to do, since there is a great debate among top Greek scholars about how to understand the «time» of
present participles
in Greek.
If the characteristic mark of hermeneutical theology is its interpretive stance, especially
in regard to
texts — both the classic
text of the Judeo - Christian tradition (the Hebrew Scriptures and the New Testament) and the exemplary theologies that build on the classic
text — then heuristic theology is also interpretive, for it claims that its successful unconventional metaphors are not only
in continuity with the paradigmatic events and their significance expressed
in this classic
text but are also appropriate expressions of these matters for the
present time.
Unless God is able to
present himself a little more convincingly than
in some often reinterpreted
texts from 2000 years ago, I prefer to accept that the universe we observe is the one and only existance.
The hierarchy on which the exegetes focus is indeed
present in these
texts.
In your
present letter you certainly have handed me a grand
text — not from the Bible, to be sure, but from Ralph Waldo Emerson.
The chanting of the holy
texts raises them up from the mundane and
presents them «as on a platter of gold»,
in the words of Fr Josef Jungmann.
Such a moral calculus is
in the
text and is thinkable
in our
present circumstance.
To people like the
present reviewer, who were lectured by scholars who discouraged this practice
in favour of getting to know the
text of a work, for example the Republic of Plato, without bothering about the background, the approach of most of the papers
in this volume is novel and challenging.
Perhaps a sermon should be regarded as great, not because everyone
in the congregation agrees with the preacher, but because at the end of the service those
present just can't wait to talk about it; to debate it together, because the
text around which it was built has captured their imagination and curiosity.
Bringing life to a dried fish (this is only
present in later
texts)(First group) 3 Miracles — Breathes life into birds fashioned from clay, curses a boy, who then becomes a corpse, curses a boy who falls dead and his parents become blind Attempt to teach Jesus which fails, with Jesus doing the teaching 3 Miracles — Reverses his earlier acts, resurrects a friend who fell from a roof, heals a man who chopped his foot with an axe [1]
The following
text was
presented as part of a conference on World Mission and the Role of Korean Churches, held
in Seoul, Korea.
When we by contrast
present Scripture
in the first instance
in terms of some particular theological framework or
in the light of specialized or critical issues, we not only fail to address the questions that trouble us, but we may also place a barrier between the reader and the
text of Scripture.
In most books, only the final view is evident, for authors seek to revise earlier positions to conform with the final one.6 All three notions are present in the text, however, for Whitehead in revising did not erase all traces of his earlier formulation
In most books, only the final view is evident, for authors seek to revise earlier positions to conform with the final one.6 All three notions are
present in the text, however, for Whitehead in revising did not erase all traces of his earlier formulation
in the
text, however, for Whitehead
in revising did not erase all traces of his earlier formulation
in revising did not erase all traces of his earlier formulations.
I recall someone teaching that the word GO
in the original
text was
in a
present continuous form.
We could then suppose that when Whitehead developed the idea of the consequent nature
in the narrow sense, he created the «primordial nature» as a contrasting term This hypothesis would make sense of the
present text of PR without supposing that Whitehead began working on the Gifford Lectures only with a noninteractive God little different from the abstract principle of concretion of SMW» (PS 15: 200).
Interestingly enough I recall reading an analysis of this
text which pointed out that
in the earliest versions of it the «go and sin no more» statement was not
present.
However — and this is well worth noting — the Bible, without adding more internal contradiction than is already
present in its pages, will also support common sense interpretations of its
texts and theologies.
The truth of the
text is found
in the lives of it's believers, past and
present, what manner of folk their scriptures have transformed them into.
As primary actors
in the speaker's drama they stage
in pulpits, chancels, or at Table, preachers first play roles
in the speaker's dramas
present in the canon as biblical
texts.
Aesthetic
texts, so went the claim,
present an experience which is shared between an author and a reader
in the communicative act of reading.
Nothing helps
in separating the various strands of data here, yet there is no Old Testament scholar I know of who believes that the
present text as our bibles have it
in Exodus Nineteen is from a single source.
In the present text of this narrative, Moses goes up and down Mount Sinai no less than three times, and for a man reputed in the biblical tradition to be in his eighties, that is no small chor
In the
present text of this narrative, Moses goes up and down Mount Sinai no less than three times, and for a man reputed
in the biblical tradition to be in his eighties, that is no small chor
in the biblical tradition to be
in his eighties, that is no small chor
in his eighties, that is no small chore.
Although accurate historical dating can at times be of exegetical significance, the crucial interpretive task lies
in determining the narrative function to which such
texts have been assigned, rather than
in supplying a reconstructed setting apart from its
present literary (canonical) context.
As I have already commented (
in note 3), it is quite unnecessary to insist that the
text means to say that all 450 prophets
in Israel (if that number is anywhere reliable) were
present at the Carmel convocation and that Elijah himself,
in person, was the executioner, dispatching them all with his own hand.
The ground of Scripture's authority is not its inspiration which dynamically extends into the
present as well, but its «structure of theology, the gospel, that undergirds the whole of the Bible and
in one way or another informs, and expresses itself
in, each of its
texts.
The Bible, however, still
presents some problems to the modern reader as he faces the actual
text, and so this book tries to meet those problems for the person — alone or
in a group — who is willing to sit before the material and allow it to speak to him.
Of course, this sort of analysis is not
present in the New Testament
texts.
My full passage which Mr. Golijov characterizes as anti «Semitic is «Golijov diminishes Jewish culpability
in Jesus» death by editing out of Mark's
text most passages that
present Jewish officialdom
in a less than benign light.»
Still, Jews know that they can not fault believers for being faithful to their holy
texts, even if they would like to see dramatic portrayals (
in which there is much latitude
in the way a message is
presented) show some more insight
in regard to their impact on viewers.