Sentences with phrase «presenting false data»

Not exact matches

The data presented last week, though not peer - reviewed, suggests they can do that remarkably well — with the algorithm, in the five - minute testing windows, detecting AFib with a 99.3 % rate of sensitivity and a 0.8 % rate of «false positives.»

The actual argument is beyond the point, the author has little grasp on the data and presents multiple false opinions as fact.

Then the «journalist» proceeded to claim that false data was widespread and that there was a coverup, but so far no evidence has been presented other than the original employee (who was fired in 2011) own confession of his wrongdoing.

We distill these candidates into sets of 104 validated planets (57 in multi-planet systems), 30 false positives, and 63 remaining candidat... ▽ More We present 197 planet candidates discovered using data from the first year of the NASA K2 mission (Campaigns 0 - 4), along with the results of an intensive program of photometric analyses, stellar spectroscopy, high - resolution imaging, and statistical validation.

Nevertheless, direct experimentation and clinical trials in humans are still lacking at the present time, and to avoid the possibility of generating false hopes the preliminary data from animal models obviously have to be considered very cautiously.

The plan is to reverse some of the long - held misconceptions that ebook lending could lead to increased piracy and decreased sales, a belief that has already been demonstrated to be false by Kobo at Digital Book World back in 2012 when Michael Tamblyn presented sales data for Suzanne Collins» Hunger Games trilogy.

One caveat with such empirical studies, however, is that the data record is incomplete and there is a risk that the analysis presents a false picture.

He claimed to present data that proved global warming was false.

When that happens there will undoubtedly be attempts to refute it scientifically by presenting empirical data, which demonstrate that the premise is false.

Critique 1) I have no idea about any cleansing, homogenisation or aggregation performed on this data prior to its presentation by Rutgers 2) Snow extent is only 1 part of the issue, thickness and mass would need to be considered for a full picture 3) I haven't taken care to provide exactly similar sample sizes, however the F and t methods do not require it 4) I haven't taken care to ensure that the same number of winter periods are present in each sample batch; this would increase the risk of a false positive and would have required further investigation if a weak indication of significance had been detected.

It was presented to test stupid denialists claims that refereed underpinning data of the global warming thesis was compiled with «trickery» or with false «assumptions».