In fact, in some parts, if you're a walker there's almost
a presumption of criminal intent (unless you're a zombie, of course... though some would consider them criminals also).
«Instead
of carefully reviewing the evidence in the case in order to determine whether or not the Crown had, in fact, established that the appellant possessed the specific
intent of wilfulness required by s. 173 (1)
of the
Criminal Code, the trial judge erroneously convicted the appellant based upon a perceived (but non-existent) legal
presumption that the necessary wilfulness was established by the fact that his acts
of masturbation were in fact witnessed by another,» he wrote.