Not exact matches
This is all
pretty ironic when you consider the fact that leaders from the WFP and the
Conservative Party, which appears to have done the best of all the minor parties, bumping the Independence Party from its perch on Row C, were so worried about the results of this election that they unsuccessfully sued to challenge the
state Board of Elections» so - called «double - vote» decision.
Pataki managed to find well - paying government jobs for Long's daughter — which I guess was fortuitous, since Pataki wasn't able to pay tribute to Long's policy views on
pretty much any area of
stated prioty for the
Conservative Party.
If there's one thing I'm
pretty sure of, it's that a
conservative Court has always looked favorably upon giving the
states the rights to make their own decisions — especially if their laws exceed the requirements of the Federal law.
And if this process of water changing
state, which is
pretty much just a process of physics and a bit of chemistry, is so very easy to get wrong — specifically, is so easy to model too conservatively so the models predict wrongly that it will be a very slow process when in fact it seems to be a much faster process — how confident can we be that other models and estimates of processes that involve multiple feedbacks that include chemical and biological interactions as well as physical ones aren't even more wildly inaccurate on the «
conservative» side?
But again the IPCC is
pretty conservative, it
states that the range from its scenario simulations are «likely», implying > 66 % (and therefore that there is 24 % probability that the temperature change will be outside the range.