The Thunder have three all - star caliber players while also surrounding them with
pretty good role players.
So, the next time you decide to criticize helping others because it is too expensive, please try and remember Jesus... Even the non-Christians generally agree that he was
a pretty good role - model.
This film reinforced my knowledge of Bill Macy's talent, made me take notice of Maria Bello, and gave Alec Baldwin
pretty his best role until 30 Rock.
Not exact matches
But I've delegated
pretty well all the C.E.O.
roles.
If you're focused on an ideal client profile type and / or a persona or
role, it's a
pretty good bet that many others are as
well.
You've changed with the times: maybe your original iterations make me want to throw up a little bit, but today, I think you're doing a
pretty good job at the
role model thing.
As the emerging church conversation has focused on the nature and
role of truth, the epistemological effects and aspects of the Enlightenment have been
pretty well worn over (though I see John Franke's latest will probably restart that conversation for a while).
I am then asked to move into an HR
role because that is what my company needs; I get used to the tasks and get
pretty good at it.
He was thrust into a
role as a horribly underprepared rookie, and he's handled the whole thing
pretty well.
I don't see anyone in the team that can play Coquelin
role pretty well.
Pretty much every player who split
roles between starting and bench either performed
better as a starter or had a negligible statistical difference (McConnell, Okafor, Henderson, TLC, Saric, Rodriguez).
Not necessarily in the centre forward
role because Olivier Giroud is doing
pretty well but there are three
good reasons for Walcott to start.
Pretty much no one on the team last year who saw decent time starting and coming off the bench shot the ball
better in the latter
role.
It literally takes
pretty much all the strengths away from our world - class triangle of Mesut, Santi and Ozil to place a struggling for form Campbell in a more attacking
role when the part of his
role he's been doing
best is providing extra defensive cover, while making us weaker in midfield when our strongest midfielder has been injured!!
It would really be interesting to see Toral integrated in the team, but its going to be difficult with an already crowded midfield, he his
pretty good in the air,
good technical skills, love to shoot at goal, i think he could also play in a forward
role.
Kaep is a
pretty good QB in the right system, but a QB like Cassel isn't much worse (considering the
role you're asking of him) and comes with no baggage.
And the timing is
pretty favourable for us as
well, because with Theo Walcott close to a comeback, Alexis can occupy the left forward position and Cazorla, Rosicky and Wilshere can fight for the number 10
role.
At times this season, and
pretty crucial times as
well, Arsene Wenger has been left with almost no options for the centre of the Arsenal midfield, Cazorla is out for the season after playing a big
role in our
good early form and there have also been injury problems for Coquelin, Ramsey and Elneny, while the summer signing Granit Xhaka has missed a fair few games himself for disciplinary reasons.
We haven't tried it, Hodgson played him in a deeper
role for England, he looked
pretty good and has discussed numerous times how comfortable in that
role he is.
Either we get someone demonstratively
better than Coq and let him go or stick with what we have and rely on Arteta for a season and further develop Chambers and maybe Bielik (but I am
pretty sure he is not ear - marked for a holding DM
role).
Ramsey is a
pretty good marauding midfielder and the only other person in our team capable of playing this
role is Wilshere if only he can stay fit (My heart breaks for him just like it did for Rosicky and Diaby).
Digging into the past, he's +50 over his career, his stats took a noticeable hit when he was moved into a shutdown
role, didn't get much ice after an elbow injury, apparently is
pretty decent at grinding and stealing pucks, and he's got 21 game winning goals and played
well with Ward.
Pretty much sums up how these Nets fans just want to trade away the guy that was instrumental to the team's
best stretch of record over the last two years, with inferior talents like Sean Kilpatrick and Isaiah Whitehead, and Levert, RHJ and Harris (before they made a huge leap this year) playing crucial
roles on the team.
I thought Ox performed that
role pretty good against Boro on the right side.
Vardy is what we can get at the moment and he is
pretty damn
good for the
role.
i.e. Ramsey «on the wing» (how people can't see the
role he plays is
pretty far from a winger is beyond me) when they think Ox is
better suited, despite his lapses in concentration which has cost us goals and continued with his game for England.
Monreal — 7 He's really adopted the «Koscielny»
role pretty well.
Juventus's Paolo Dybala and Liverpool's Philippe Coutinho have also been rumored to be Barca targets: The 23 - year - old Dybala profiles similarly to Neymar — producing a relatively even mix of goals and assists, while playing a key
role in moving the attack toward goal — and Coutinho, who's 25, does
pretty much everything
well outside of «taking
good shots.»
Offensively speaking, Astori, tipped with filling Mehdi Benatia's
role of distributing from the back, fared
pretty well.
I don't really think Defoe is a
good comparison, Defoe is much quicker than Lacazette and is
pretty much just a poacher — that is a dead
role in the current PL since nobody plays with two strikers and you really need someone to play off of in that
role, either a target man or a deep - lying forward.
Tottenham seem
pretty secure in the Centre Defensive Midfield
role with the experienced Mousa Dembele, Eric Dier, Victor Wanyama as
well as Harry Winks who seems to be a future star.
The NYLCV is likely feeling
pretty good after playing a
role in the loss of its top primary target, Democratic Sen. Bill Stachowski, who was ousted on Sept. 14 by Erie County Legislator Tim Kennedy.
You may have thought that scarves were the finishing touch, but all your
pretty jewels play a
role in the art of layering as
well.
The movie portrayed her personality and as a legend of a woman posed as a man to enter the monastery and become Pope.German actress Johanna Wokalek was
pretty good for that
role and the other performances were decent as well.The portrayal of the time, crowds and the cities was below average, but very effective, since it was a low - budget movie, the image and lighting quality was not always
good.The weak point of the movie was in the rhythm, which at times was uneven, and went from fast to very slow, but still it was never boring because of the strong plot.
In the end, Keaton did
pretty well in the
role, but it seemed that the pressures might have gotten to him to some degree.
Daniel Radcliffe was
pretty good, if a bit young for the
role.
I think the film is
pretty good but doesn't really stand out because it's too polished - the gangsters have gentlemanly attributes, far from Cagney's more realistic portrayal, and for all their pre-Code banter, the romantic exchanges lack real passion, with the exception of Mae Clarke (in a minor
role), whose reaction when she's jilted is quite
good.
Before he was a made - for - TV wacko, Gary Busey was a
pretty fine actor — and never
better than when he played the title
role in 1978's «The Buddy Holly Story,» a biopic of the «50s rock star whose life ended early.
The cast also contributed tremendously
well with Carell, in my opinion, being the standout and once again showing us that he can definitely do more dramatic
roles like this, Bale as always was freakin fabulous with his complex character, Gosling was
pretty much the narrator but he was once again really funny and Pitt is the moral center, he didn't had more screentime but he delivers.
There's a unique novelty in general to this film's featuring its protagonist as a biopic in the starring
role, and as a war film, it has a few other twists, but when it falls to formula, it falls
pretty hard, with very mid-20th century Hollywood tropes to its plotting, characterization and, for that matter, fluff which tends to get a little too fluffy for its own
good.
The only reason my rating is so high is the fact that I never expected it to be as
good as it was, It come as quite a surprise how funny it was, Ice Cube basically plays the same character that made his
role in the Jump Street films so
good, It's nothing new but it's full of cheap laughs from start to finish and the fight at the end was
pretty entertaining, Yes it's predictable but it's allot of fun.
Owen Wilson and Ben Stiller have a real and
good chemistry and we can feel it.The movie is funny, action packed and really
well made.Even Vince Vaughn was actually
pretty good and we can't forget Snoop Dog and Jason Bateman.They were really
good in their supporting
role.
It's a
well - known awards formula that putting on or losing weight for a harrowing
role,
pretty much guarantees nominations galore.
If nothing else, Brolin is already having a
pretty good time with this Cable
role.
The script, by Robert D. Siegel (The Wrestler) and Hancock, was in
pretty high demand as it made the rounds through Hollywood, but it's hard to imagine an actor
better suited for this particular
role than Keaton, who's going through a delightful resurgence of late between Birdman, Spotlight, and and now possibly Spider - Man: Homecoming.
Most projects that are gender flipped from male to female
roles tend to work out
pretty well.
«The latest big - screen iteration of the blockbuster video game isn't a film for the ages, but it's actually
pretty good fun; an old - fashioned treasure - island adventure tale gilded in circa - 2018 wokeness (Lara Croft's breasts no longer command a lead supporting
role) and anchored by an Oscar - winning actress far more gifted than the story requires.
Comic legend Stan Lee has notched an appearance in
pretty much every Marvel movie so far; Deadpool 2, which was produced by Marvel Entertainment, recently notched one of the
best cameo moments in superhero history when Brad Pitt showed up for approximately two seconds in a funny, blink - and - you'll - miss - it
role.
American film with most of the main
roles going to British actors,
well I say actors but none of them are really proper actors hehe Vinnie Jones, Tamer Hassan and Luke Goss, all Southerners and all
pretty hard..
Of the other two key characters in this film, Mr. Washington is more caricature than character (although ultimately a
pretty good baddie, thanks to Purefoy having some fun with the
role), and the Senator is far too much a mystery to be believable (and a waste of Freeman's talents).