Sentences with phrase «pretty much error»

Even then, it took years to get right: When scientists sequence a genome, they're able to accept one error in a thousand genes or so, but to build a DNA code that will support life, you need to be pretty much error - free.

Not exact matches

ALl one has to do is look at surrounding passages and see it is Jesus that's beoing referred to... Bart pretty much passes this along as an error... which is dishonest on his part...

Brother Myers, is my theology in error or pretty much biblical.

Do you believe the bible is inerrant in the autographa and has been accurately copied down through the generations to the extent that we realize there are scribal errors but we pretty much know what they are?

I addressed the inerrant part... your understanding of inerrant assumes error in the words... inreent refers to truth itself... all the versions aghain say pretty much same thing..

When practicing the Law of Love, we are pretty much «flying by the seat of our pants,» relying on common sense and intuition rather than a moral manual or theological dogmas to keep us from making errors in judgment.

The results were within a couple of percent of each other, which would be pretty much be due to experimental error.

But thanks to a lovely syncing error with Quickbooks, my business tax preparation this year ended up being pretty much the opposite of «quick», and pretty much dominated most of my week.

An 18 - play, error filled scoring drive pretty much summed up Sunday's game in a nutshell.

The business is pretty much trial and error, anyway.»

An error allowing a run and another bad defensive play that pretty much allowed the other run.

Hamilton was fine, but he'll be starting the race from pretty much right at the back, much to the annoyance of Sebastian Vettel, who probably wished he'd made an error like that a couple of race ago when he still had a chance of the championship.

it pretty much means that just about every other team in baseball had a shot to take the players on the right as well and did not... so it's not like the Braves are making some egregious errors.

Pretty soon, through much trial and error, I even found that I could be helpful!

The margin of error for the poll is + / - 4.5 percentage points, so statistically speaking it's pretty much a wash.

This is another suggestion based on the margin for errors — the «it» business dress is pretty much a no brainer.

As is the case with pretty much any scenario involving both the great outdoors and exposed genitals, the experience is less steamy than it is a painful comedy of errors, complete with eight - legged intruders.

X-Men: Apocalypse Rated PG - 13 for sequences of violence, action and destruction, brief strong language and some suggestive images Rotten Tomatoes Score: 48 % While the X-Men First Class trilogy had been moving along nicely, director Bryan Singer made a humongous error with this final chapter, posing Oscar Isaac as the all - powerful Apocalypse, a seemingly immortal villain capable of doing pretty much anything.

I made a grave error in watching Thai / Korean action comedy The Kick pretty much straight after Michael Haneke's raw and exceptional Amour.

That pretty much solved the XML - RPC end point error I was experiencing and I hope it does for you too.

Once you have the basics down the rest of the stuff is pretty much trial and error.

, I'd like you to consider that a passive, low - cost, index - based, diversified and automatic (PLIDA) investment strategy will help you to overcome 9 out of 10 of these errors — pretty much everything except error # 10 (because you don't need to pay for a financial advisor).

How to tell if an excess of treats is the issue: Trial and error is pretty much the only way — try reducing the number of treats, sticking to lower - calorie options, or offering treats only on a set schedule.

Unfortunately, the queuing system was pretty much broken, so instead of having to wait a few minutes, players were booted back to the title screen with error 1017 when they tried to select their characters.

Starting the game you're presented with speeds for Low, Med and Hi, except they're all pretty much the same slow speed and - thanks to a coding error - the medium speed is faster than the high speed option.

I am pretty much only bothering with the «mis - represents cited sources» class of error these days.

We know how much radiation comes from the sun, and we know the effects of CO2, but there are pretty large error bars on aerosols that this mission could help with.

(This is pretty - much what he managed when he first addressed # 235 with his comment @ 238, although he does excuse his ignoring the bulk of # 235 saying «we could go on and on quibbling over all the various ins and outs, but as far as I'm concerned I've made the essential points,» which he then trots out with added error just in case anybody missed it before.)

I believe that the uncertainty in the trend actually grows (you get «error amplification» near the end points associated with the OLS fit) as you approach the end point, and I've been warning pretty much everybody who felt like participating in this curve fitting exercise.

In Lamb's times, when pretty much only CET and a single ice core were all the observations Lamb had, it might have been an acceptable basis, with very wide error bars, for a guess.

IMO, the science dictates that the «debate» about climate change probably won't be «settled» for maybe 150 years, when error ranges will pretty much exclude ambiguity at a meaningful level.

A bunch of the lab mice, Rasmus Benestad, Dana Nuccitelli, Stephan Lewandowsky, Katherine Hayhoe, Hans Olav Hygen, Rob van Dorland, and John Cook have taken MM04 under the microscope as an example of, well, pretty much all of category of errors discussed in their recent paper.

Very hard to see how you would pin that assumption down without enough error terms to check the assumption (and I don't see 1988 as much better) in fact if you look at the graph it's pretty obvious that a linear fit is not appropriate as the error term is far from random.

So yes, that range of error pretty much means the Antarctic cores are novelties without verification.

Steve's observations here are more evidence that the error bars around the proxy - reconstructions are much wider than the published estimates — a point that Judith Curry has been making, and that McShayne & Wyner demonstrated pretty convincingly in their statistical review of the proxy data.

RE: 4th Error -RCB- Poses an objection to the non-scientific term catastrophic [NOTE: Scientific «consensus» is often being used & / or implied in standard climate - change discourse - Yet Consensus is a Political Term - NOT a Scientific Term]- HOWEVER - When Jim Hansen, the IPCC & Al Gore, et - al - go from predicting 450 — 500 ppm CO2 to 800 — 1000ppm by the end of the 21st century -LCB- said to the be highest atmospheric CO2 content in 20 — 30 Million YRS -RCB-; — & estimates for aver global temps by 21st century's end go from 2 * C to 6 * C to 10 * C; — & increased sea level estimates go from 10 - 20 cm to 50 - 60 cm to 1M — 2M -LCB- which would totally submerge the Maldives & partially so Bangladesh -RCB-; — predictions of the total melting of the Himalayan Ice caps by 2050, near total melting of Greenland's ice sheet & partial melting of Antarctica's ice sheet before the 21st century's end; — massive crop failures; — more intense & frequent hurricane -LCB- ala Katrina -RCB- for much longer seasonal durations, etc, etc, etc... — IMO That's Sounds pretty damned CATASTROPHIC to ME!

Within generally accepted error margins for one (two) of these terms, the error margin of the remaining term can not be further constrained: They pretty much are each other's mirror image.

The problem is, Bob, that is this level of «errors» is enough for you to drown the whole debate with your error claims, I think you could attack pretty much all other stories the same way.

One, if fair - minded, is pretty much bound to suspect claims of heat which is practically undetectable without using very sensitive instruments with outputs well within the error bars, with claims of real detectable heat coming soon with the next batch of funding.

The topic categories of the blog went pretty much untouched, including: bedsores, infections, medication errors, and staff behavior.

The ACYF and federal child welfare budget is pretty much a rounding error for most high - profile government agencies.

It's pretty much trial and error until you get them straight.