Not exact matches
«We're concluding it
pretty much is garbage,» said Prof. Hulchanski, who co-directs data
analysis of the Neighbourhood Change Research Partnership based at U of T.
I
pretty much weigh all my food so I think its fairly accurate — you put your food in for the day and hit the «
analysis» button and you get your grade for the day!
Final
Analysis: I'm tempted to leave this blank, since there's a
pretty good chance none of these teams actually make it to New Orleans, but if I must... Kentucky will have too
much inside for Missouri, while Ohio State will relish the opportunity to play Kansas with a healthy Jared Sullinger available.
I also
pretty much agree with Katelyn and your
analyses.
In other expert
analysis, I have no idea why Sami Khedira is still starting
pretty much every game Juve plays.
While most laypeople won't likely want to read the entire
analysis and rebuttal of Wax's work, it is significant because these researchers
pretty much refute all of Wax's work and show, step by step, how flawed the study was and how referencing this study as a basis for decision making is also flawed.
Enter Sir Robin Wales, leader of Newham council and whose tenure must, under any reasonable
analysis, be seen as a
pretty much runaway success.
Agree
pretty much with H. Hemeligs
analysis here.
After conducting genetic
analyses, they discovered that the hemoglobin genes of snow leopards look and work
pretty much the same as those in other cats, they report today in The Journal of Experimental Biology.
That's
pretty much the muscle and strength
analysis of carrying a heavy backpack.
Report, description,
analysis, comparison, ratings, rankings, evaluation — aren't these all
pretty much the same thing?
This was
pretty good, but I felt it gave too
much credit to author service companies like those under the umbrella of Author Solutions without giving them the kind of critical
analysis that the folks at Writer Beware do.
I'd put
pretty much all technical
analysis in that category.
Applying this criterion and
analysis upon a fund of funds is almost impossible, and I believe that this is
pretty much difficult to do for regular mutual funds as well, apart from a few established companies.
A Monte Carlo
analysis is essentially plugging in a range of possible values (a probability function) for yearly values of
pretty much anything involved in your financial life: salary growth, investment rate of return, expected life span, etc, etc, etc.... and then running thousands of simulations on those values to give you the probability that your money will last until you die.
Little did I know that (despite the volatility involved) this would turn out to be a very fortunate approach — it
pretty much saved me from the consequences of poor / misguided stock
analysis, chasing stock tips and investing in garbage stocks all the way down to zero.
There are 2 cards that I consider
pretty much identical in doing this
analysis.
Both the BMO World Elite and MBNA World Elite cards earn you 2 cents / dollar spent on all purchases.They are
pretty much similar on the earnings side, so they get lumped in together for this
analysis.
This game is being hyped up (through the media, marketing and consequently most consumers) so
much as something revolutionary and new, but I'm
pretty confident that once all that hype dissolves post-launch, a more objective
analysis will reveal a game that doesn't do a whole lot that can really be called «new.»
They find —
pretty much in line with the Foster and Rahmstorf
analysis — that La Niña conditions have made 2011 a relatively cool year — relatively, because they predict it will still rank amongst the 10 hottest years on record.
I guess that is then what we disagree about, since the figure on page 109
pretty much eliminates all possible renewable sources without real arguments or thorough
analysis, leaving the reader with the impression that renewables are only capable of generating 15 kWh / d of the necessary 125 kWh.
It's even more humourous, since even the more limited
analysis available before this paper showed
pretty much the same amount of Antarctic warming.
Short term
analyses are
pretty much useless given the level of noise.
Not really, I am not going to do your kind of
analysis since «global» surface temperature is
pretty much a useless reference.
The fact that ARGO sampling
pretty much misses out one of the fastest warming regions in the world while having no such deficiencies in regions of cooling means any
analysis using only ARGO data will produce trends lower than the true global average, unless the
analysis somehow accounts for this bias.
As such, Marxist
analysis dramatically changed for the better our understanding of history, which until Schopenhauer, Engels, Hegel and Marx, et al, was
pretty much a dry list of kingly ascensions, poetry and battle descriptions.
At the time, Esper had refused to provide the measurement data or chronologies for Esper et al 2002 and it was
pretty much impossible to try to develop the
analysis further.
It's
pretty much impossible to do a cost - benefit
analysis without that PDF.
If Monte Carlo
analysis were done on the climate models, I am sure that what we would see is
pretty much equal probability for any outcome — ie flat kurtosis.
That poster presents an
analysis, which includes elements of Box9.2 Figure 1a, that is a far better way to assess model performance than what is being pushed by Dana Nuccitelli, and shows that, contrary to Dana's claims (which are often unjustified by proper application of the facts), climate models are doing
pretty much as bad as you think.
Poor Communication by Scientists + Full Court Press by Denial Lobbyists to Blame Over at Huffington Post, Andrew Weaver, professor of climate
analysis at the University of Victoria,
pretty much nails why this is happening — despite the fact that scientific evidence continues to mount that global warming is indeed happening and caused in the largest part by human activity:
Our altcoins technical
analysis remains
pretty much the same and with IOTA sliding, Monero found its way back to the top 10 spot.
- Sidebar... I know from listening to
pretty much every podcast that «
Analysis Paralysis» is a big thing that stops people from investing.