Sentences with phrase «pretty much the cost»

I think Bennett was out of there after he stated, correctly, to the media that the staff had called a stupid blitz at the end of the Washington game at home that season, which pretty much cost the Bucs the game.

Finding value from these castoffs for pretty much no cost (in terms of real value) is basically a way of getting something out of nothing.

chamberlain is pretty much costing us a goal a game and no one else is quality enough to play the right flank.

So it's, in my opinion, pretty much cost prohibitive.

so its better payin it 400 pretty much cost me almost 400 like 380?

The cost of fossil fuels is pretty much the cost of the coal, oil and gas, although, of course, there are infrastructure costs, but a reasonable estimate (and Eli is the most reasonable bunny you could ever meet, as a colleague just wrote, reasonably insane perhaps, but reasonable nonetheless).

Customer service is poor, glitches happen frequently locking teens out of the course, and worst of all they all pretty much cost the same.

Not exact matches

Apart from providing a relatively simple and cost - effective new polling tool for capturing customer comments, sentiments, and concerns, which almost any content creator can readily employ (pretty much DIY), SquareOffs delivers on the five most important attributes of any new digital media solution.

For audacious dealers, bitcoin's soaring cost could mean brisk benefits, pretty much as a sudden monetary drop could spell huge misfortunes.

As a matter of fact, it is cost effective to use the internet and social media platforms to promote your brands, besides it is pretty much effective and wide reaching.

Mining fees are a seriously important cost for pretty much any Bitcoin - focused startup to consider.

You can pretty much take out all of the PLUS loans you need to cover school attendance costs that exceed the other financial assistance and loans you've received.

I do nt get to socialize with gays much... I know many personally... just do nt socialize with them... had one who was a roomate and we did not know he was gay till after he was arrested and moved out for fraud (he was a pathological liar - had nothing to do with his being gay) he pretty much avoided me cause of his being found out to have lied and cost me and another roomate s thousands of dollars in hpne calls that he blamed my best friend on, etc etc..

So yes, Logos Bible Software books are more expensive than I think they should be, but then, I am a cheapskate, and I think cars, houses, computers, and pretty much everything I buy costs more than it should.

«Sometimes, we don't test products as much as we should before we try it out for real, and the cost of stopping the big lines is pretty high,» Leclerc concedes.

We eat way too much of this stuff together... it's super easy, healthy, cost effective and such a pretty purp!

Hell, they even cost pretty much the same.

Schemes like the Red Bull programme and its Mercedes / Ferrari counterparts pretty much cover all the costs of a race season, meaning that in the championships that followed such as Formula Renault 3.5 and GP2 Gasly didn't need to find money or a good seat, because Red Bull was helping to sort it all out for him.

I know you wan na argue that a 3rd rounder for a Taylor is SOOOOO daunting, but given the fact that Foles is gonna cost a 1st and 3rd at least, Kizer just cost the Packers a starting CB (and Kizer isn't even a starter), Bradford just cost a 1st and 4th, Cutler cost the Bears a 2 1sts and a 3rd (and a player), Palmer cost a 1st and a 2nd, and Alex Smith cost a 3rd and a starting corner, a simple 3rd for a starting QB is pretty much below market value if anything.

Chamberlain is nothing short of a liability well demonstrated in the everton game where he got duly disposessed after attempting to dribble with pretty much everyone infront of him and nobody behind him costing us a goal... the same same thing he did in preseason again versus everton costing us Barkley's goal.

Full of praise for pretty much the same players that cost us the tie with that disgraceful first leg.

David Ospina pretty much has the starting role in the league nailed down after Szczesny's ill - advised cigarette in January which has cost him so dear.

Most of us were pretty happy that the Gunners brought in two superstrikers at a cost of over # 50m each, but according to Thierry Henry, it is very unlikely that Wenger would be willing to pay that much for a much - needed centre - back.

The old LMP2 rules seemed pretty much perfect but because this is motor racing the «powers that be» like to fix things that aren't broken, so LMP2 has had an overhaul for 2017 in the name of cutting costs.

The fact that he cost more than pretty much established internationals under the pretence that he is one for the future, shows me that Wenger has a lot more power than you make him out to have; For god sake Virgil Van Dyk cost 3 million less and is only 3 years older.

I'm not sure it makes much difference overall though, b / c when a guy gets 2 in the zone they back off, and against good teams that is usually when those teams have pretty good runs against us, making the cost in terms of point differential probably not much different than if the player sat.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

I'm also pretty sure a lot of fans were suggesting he'd cost too much money while there were a few saying he'd go for 30 - 35mil with reasonable wage demands??

It made for some pretty pictures, but the terrible conditions cost pretty much all the teams an entire day of running.

Obviously he's doing to say he's not going to cost a huge stack of cash, with his 12 goals this season just outside the top five where the likes of his countrymen Tévez, Mauro Icardi and Gonzalo Higuaín have been pretty much all year.

Cost is rumoured at about $ 420, which pretty much rivals the existing, noisier and bulkier, pumps currently on the market.

I didn't come up with much and was pretty disappointed at the cost of having a custom one made.

Depending on how much of a freak you are in the bedroom, that can sure cost him a pretty penny.

I would therefore be very pleased if anyone better informed about such matters could let me know why meetings conducted with webcams over the internet are not pretty much as good as face - to - face meetings, given the environmental cost of the latter.

For example, when Obama and the democrats forced Obamacare through congress in 2009, with the republic party pretty much excluded from the crafting of the bill, a lot of conservative and right wing people felt disenfranchised - a major change to their lives (that cost them quite a bit of money) was made without their...

For example, when Obama and the democrats forced Obamacare through congress in 2009, with the republic party pretty much excluded from the crafting of the bill, a lot of conservative and right wing people felt disenfranchised - a major change to their lives (that cost them quite a bit of money) was made without their input.

And for the traditional «how much more will my fags cost me» betting, things are pretty much the same as ever.

If they did one on COTS and CCiCap they would come to similar conclusions but the big kicker here is that the NASA funding is pretty much fixed and any schedule slippage resulting in cost increase is picked up by the commercial partners.

The cost of taking a family of eight out to eat means I've pretty much made my peace with cooking at home, other than the occasional date night out.

As for specific brands, at this point it comes down pretty much to just taste and cost.

The point is, it's up to you how little you want to spend: for $ 5 you could pretty much have everything you need for your own low - cost home gym.

In my current dreaming stage that includes lots of Pinterest re-pinning, and I've been gravitating towards clean, bright, minimalist, moroccan inspiration -LCB- which I'm going to say might be a thing, even it's probably not -RCB- From leather poufs to fiddle leaf ferns, hand - woven rugs, and pretty gold accents — I've been semi-seriously looking into how much cute little fixer - uppers might cost to one day have a little spot of my own.

Pretty much every single nacho costs you about 50 cents.

And after looking through pretty much every item on the Pixie Market website, I can vouch that EVERYTHING looks like it costs way more than it does.

But they cost $ 220, so pretty much # 220 these days...

It's got a timeless military look you can hold onto forever and ever, and is pretty much a steal when you consider the cost - per - wear ratio.

And it's not the IS (image stabilized) version, which costs about $ 2000 extra, so you need to pretty much shoot in daylight hours.

We can all get pretty much anything, anywhere, any time, but having items tailored to our preferences is a way to invest in items that feel special and unique and doing so in the beauty space is a heck of a lot more cost - effective than, say, haute couture.

Given how much eHarmoney costs for one month, Collide seems pretty reasonable.

Let's face it, if you've seen one superhero story, you've pretty much seen them all: alien / regular kid affected by supernatural powers / rich person with access to fantastic gadgets rises to meet regular threats from ne'erdowells, learning lessons about the costs of being a hero.