He's been saying that climate science is alarm - driven for years, but this opinion presents
pretty weak evidence of that.
Not exact matches
Judith Curry conclusions «[C1] It looks to me that the
evidence for accelerating anthropogenic sea level rise is
pretty weak -LSB-...][C2] The practical issues associated with sea level rise are fundamentally local, and local sea level rise can be substantially different from GMSL rise.
When the conclusions you reach vary so drastically with the prior, what it should be telling you is that most of your knowledge about the date is not coming from the radiocarbon data, which is
pretty weak and uninformative
evidence, it's coming from your prior expectations.