Not exact matches
However, this opposition has to be
understood in the context of the more general mistrust of science
prevailing at the time, given the international
climate of socialism, which it saw as a consequence of evolutionism.
My comment on thermodynamics was intended to counter what seems to be a
prevailing notion that global
climate models are so complicated we don't
understand anything they do.
I'm not mind - blown, but as someone without relevant scientific background, I'm always encouraged by work which might contribute to a better
understanding of
climate and what drives changes than
prevailed when the science first became «settled» perhaps 12 - 15 years ago.
So
climate modelers have an incentive to tweak their models as much as scientifically justified in order to generate something new, publishable, and in opposition to the
prevailing scientific
understanding of
climate disruption.