Eddy Curry's Chicago injury lawyer, Mark Belongia, said his client and
the prevailing plaintiff in the suit have agreed to a payment plan and that he already has made the first installment.
Not exact matches
2205 (2011)[U.S. Supreme Ct.]; author — Justice Kagan: «But for» test applies when determining whether a
prevailing defendant should recover fees
in a
plaintiff's civil rights
suit involving both frivolous and nonfrivolous claims, rejecting the district court's use of a «focus» test.
A study commissioned by the American Constitution Society reveals that, based on data from 1979 to 2006,
plaintiffs who brought employment discrimination
suits in federal district courts
prevailed only 15 percent of the time, compared to 51 percent for non-employment related cases.
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari from the Tenth Circuit's decision
in Marx v. General Revenue Corp., U.S. No. 11 - 1175, to determine whether a
prevailing defendant can be awarded routine costs (not attorney's fees) against a losing
plaintiff in a Fair Debt Collection Practice Act (FDCPA) case where the
plaintiff was found to have brought the
suit in good faith.