The finding that curative interventions are more effective than preventive interventions may be explained by a lower
prevalence of child maltreatment in at - risk families / the general population than in maltreating families, making it «more difficult» to find significant differences between intervention and control groups (because of lower statistical power) and consequently, to prove the effectiveness of an intervention.
The toolkit also includes information on obtaining agency participation, cost issues in studying
the prevalence of child maltreatment, dissemination, and sustainability.
Given the high
prevalence of child maltreatment and the serious consequences in terms of its impact on the lives of the individuals concerned, their families, and society more generally, it is important that we identify effective methods of prevention and intervention, and there are some suggestions that a public health approach is now needed.27 Although there is limited research available in terms of what works to prevent child maltreatment, there have been significant gains over the past 20 years in terms of the development of new approaches.
In general, the research shows that home visiting programs have the greatest, albeit modest, effect on parents» support for children's learning and in reducing
the prevalence of child maltreatment, but that these effects are strongest for the most disadvantaged program participants.
The purpose of this study was to estimate
the prevalence of child maltreatment in the United States and examine its relationship to sociodemographic factors and major adolescent health risks.
In general, the research shows that home visiting programs have the greatest, albeit still modest, effect on parents» support for children's learning and in reducing
the prevalence of child maltreatment, but that these effects are strongest for the most disadvantaged program participants.
Table 1 shows
the prevalence of child maltreatment for various groups of children.
What is
the prevalence of child maltreatment investigations (for abuse or neglect) in the public school population by the time students reach third grade?
Not exact matches
Child Maltreatment:
Prevalence, Incidence, and Consequences in East Asia and the Pacific
Maltreatment of children - including physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; neglect; and exploitation - is all too prevalent in the East Asia and Pacific regions, a report from UNICEF finds.
Substance abuse Substance abuse by a
child's parent or guardian is commonly considered to be responsible for a substantial proportion
of child maltreatment reported to the
child welfare services.1 Studies examining the
prevalence of substance abuse among caregivers who have maltreated their
children have found rates ranging from 19 percent2 to 79 percent or higher.3 One widely quoted estimate
of the
prevalence of substance abuse among care - givers involved in
child welfare is 40 to 80 percent.4 An epidemiological study published in the American Journal
of Public Health in 1994 found 40 percent
of parents who had physically abused their
child and 56 percent who had neglected their
child met lifetime criteria for an alcohol or drug disorder.5
The high
prevalence and serious consequences
of child maltreatment point to the importance
of effective prevention and treatment programs.
Some maltreated
children likely remained in our comparison sample, given the
prevalence rate
of maltreatment in the general population.15 However, any bias introduced in our estimates would be toward zero if maltreated
children in our comparison group had higher expenditures on average compared with nonmaltreated
children.
Child Maltreatment in the United States:
Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Adolescent Health Consequences (PDF - 291 KB) Hussey, Chang, & Kotch Pediatrics, 118 (3), 2006 Examines the sociodemographic characteristics
of children who were maltreated and their later health outcomes.
Prevalence of Maltreatment Among Youths in Public Sectors of Care Miller, Green, Fettes, & Aarons (2011) Child Maltreatment, 16 (3) View Abstract Examines multiple types of maltreatment across five public sectors of care using data from youths aged 11 to 18 enrolled in one of the f
Maltreatment Among Youths in Public Sectors
of Care Miller, Green, Fettes, & Aarons (2011)
Child Maltreatment, 16 (3) View Abstract Examines multiple types of maltreatment across five public sectors of care using data from youths aged 11 to 18 enrolled in one of the f
Maltreatment, 16 (3) View Abstract Examines multiple types
of maltreatment across five public sectors of care using data from youths aged 11 to 18 enrolled in one of the f
maltreatment across five public sectors
of care using data from youths aged 11 to 18 enrolled in one
of the five sectors.
First, the estimates presented herein may underestimate the true cumulative
prevalence of maltreatment and misestimate racial / ethnic disparities in
child maltreatment because our estimates are based on
maltreatment that came to the attention
of and were confirmed by CPS.
Indeed, the most recent estimate
of the cumulative risk for self - reported
maltreatment in a national sample shows that more than 40 %
of children ever experience
maltreatment, indicating that the cumulative
prevalence of self - reported
maltreatment is roughly 3 times the cumulative
prevalence of confirmed
maltreatment.20 Although this limitation applies to all CPS data, it still bears mentioning.40
Main Outcomes and Measures The cumulative
prevalence of confirmed
child maltreatment by race / ethnicity, sex, and year.
The brief explores what is currently known about the
prevalence of young
children (ages birth to 5) in the
child welfare system, how
maltreatment or neglect affects their development, and the services currently offered versus needed for these
children.
A recent series
of meta - analyses showed that worldwide
prevalence rates
of child maltreatment ranged from 0.3 % based on studies using
maltreatment reports
of professionals to 36.6 % based on self - report studies (Stoltenborgh et al. 2014).
We believe this demonstrates that the methodological issue
of the
prevalence of maltreatment in the comparison group, while not easily solved, is a key contributor to the apparently weaker associations between
child maltreatment and mental disorders observed in prospective studies relative to those observed in retrospective studies.