A person who wished to prevent disclosure of genuinely confidential information, either by the SFO or by a person SFO had disclosed documents to, would need to rely on judicial review proceedings or seek an injunction to
prevent a breach of confidence.
Not exact matches
This low - risk group requires the GDPR basics; so that they are aware
of the risks, and have the
confidence to raise the alarm to
prevent potential
breaches.
Miller goes on to add some other activities which, in his view, constitute criminal contempt: obstructing persons officially connected with the court or its process, interference with persons under the special protective jurisdiction
of the court,
breach of duty by persons officially connected with the court or its process, forging, altering or abusing the process
of the court, divulging the
confidences of the jury room,
preventing access by the public to courts
of law, service
of process in the precinct
of the court, and disclosing the identity
of witnesses.
He concluded that the test to be applied when considering whether it was necessary to restrict freedom
of expression to
prevent disclosure
of information received in
confidence was not simply whether the information was a matter
of public interest but whether, in all the circumstances, it was in the public interest that the duty
of confidence should be
breached.
When considering whether it is necessary to restrict freedom
of expression to
prevent disclosure
of information received in
confidence, the test is not simply whether the information is a matter
of public interest but whether, in all the circumstances, it is in the public interest that the duty
of confidence should be
breached.