This will give the world an opportunity to reach the ultimate destination — a world that has
prevented dangerous levels of climate change.
The bilateral agreements between China and the US administrations to make efforts to reduce emissions to
prevent dangerous levels of climate change sent several signals.
Not exact matches
Officially, the stated goal
of COP15, according to United Nations organizers, is «to stabilize the amount
of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere at a
level that
prevents dangerous man - made
climate changes.»
The 1992 U.N. treaty [Framework Convention on
Climate Change] called for «stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.
Climate Change] called for «stabilization
of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a
level that would
prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the
climate system.
climate system.»
And so under this existing binding international law, nations have the ability to make choices that make sense for them on how they will keep their GHG emissions at
levels that in combination with the GHG emissions
of other countries will
prevent dangerous climate change.
In truth, the intergovernmental body entrusted to
prevent «
dangerous»
levels of climate change has not only failed to make progress over its twenty - odd years
of work (and more than ninety official negotiation meetings since the agreement was adopted), it has overseen a process
of virtually uninterrupted backsliding.
Although it is beyond the scope
of this entry to explain the following in the detail such a conclusion deserves, all ethical theories would require that developed nations to reduce their emissions to
levels more stringent than
levels of emissions reductions necessary to
prevent dangerous climate change.
President Obama managed to get fairly wide spread support for the Copenhagen Accord on the last day
of the Copenhagen negotiations despite the fact that the United States was not able to commit to emissions reductions at
levels to
prevent dangerous climate change.
For this reason, any reliance on natural gas combustion as a method
of reducing CO2 emissions must provide for ramped up commitments to non-fossil fuel sources
of energy at
levels needed to
prevent dangerous climate change.
This latest report was made at the conclusion
of these negotiations during which almost no progress was made in defining equity under UNFCCC by the Ad Hoc Working Group on Durban Platform For Enhanced Action (ADP), a mechanism under the UNFCCC that seeks to achieve a adequate global
climate agreement, despite a growing consensus among most observers
of the UNFCCC negotiations that nations need to align their emissions reductions commitments to
levels required
of them by equity and justice if the world is going to
prevent extremely
dangerous climate change.
Yet because the US projected reductions
of 9.5 % below 2005 in 2020 is equal to a 2 % increase above 1990
levels in 2020 at a moment in history when many scientists believe that a reductions
of 25 to 4o % below 1990
levels by 2020 are necessary to
prevent dangerous climate change, the US projected reductions fall extraordinarily short
of any reasonable US fair share
of tolerable global emissions.
The United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change (UNFCCC) is an environmental treaty that nations joined in 1992, with the goal of stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous human interference with the climate
Climate Change (UNFCCC) is an environmental treaty that nations joined in 1992, with the goal
of stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a
level that would
prevent dangerous human interference with the
climate climate system.
Indeed, the market conditions and policies necessary to make the tar sands a cost - effective source
of energy will almost certainly result in
dangerous levels of global warming that will exceed two degrees Celsius, the internationally agreed upon limit that will
prevent climate change from destroying the planet.
Both
of these effects, along with
changes in natural variables must be examined explicitly by efforts to understand
climate change and devise policy that complies with the objective of Article 2 of the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change to stabilize «greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference in the climate system.
climate change and devise policy that complies with the objective of Article 2 of the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change to stabilize «greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference in the climate system.&
change and devise policy that complies with the objective
of Article 2
of the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change to stabilize «greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference in the climate system.
Climate Change to stabilize «greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference in the climate system.&
Change to stabilize «greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a
level that would
prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference in the
climate system.
climate system.»
As a result, nations have failed to adopt
climate change policies consistent with their equitable obligations despite the fact that all nations who are parties to the UNFCCC agreed, when they became parties, to reduce their emissions to
levels required
of them based upon «equity» to
prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the
climate system.
Some nations including the United States have selected baseline years such as 2005 which represents the year
of its peak emissions, 13 years after the United States agreed in the 1992 UNFCCC to adopt policies and measures to
prevent dangerous climate change that would return ghg emissions to
levels that existed before 1992 by 2000.
An adequate global
climate change solution will need to limit total global ghg emissions to
levels which will
prevent atmospheric concentrations
of ghgs from accumulating to
dangerous levels and to do this any solution will also need to allocate total global emissions
levels among all nations.
The 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change states as an objective the ``... stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.
Climate Change states as an objective the ``... stabilization
of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a
level that would
prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the
climate system.
climate system.»
To achieve the ultimate objective
of the Convention to stabilize greenhouse gas concentration in the atmosphere at a
level that would
prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the
climate system, we shall, recognizing the scientific view that the increase in global temperature below 2 degrees, on the basis
of equity and in the context
of sustainable development, enhance our long - term cooperative action to combat
climate change.
The objective
of Article 2
of the United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change (United Nations, 1992) is to achieve stabilisation of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate
Climate Change (United Nations, 1992) is to achieve stabilisation
of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a
level that would
prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the
climate climate system.
That suggests the risks
of climate change are greater than feared, and that we'll have to cut emissions even deeper to
prevent dangerous levels of warming.
Our stated purpose is to
prevent dangerous climate change, but the current
level of greenhouse gases is already extremely
dangerous.