So while CDR solutions might be ineffective today, CDR solutions could prove to be an absolutely critical option to
preventing climate change in the future.
Not exact matches
Researchers state that jackfruit could
prevent millions suffering from hunger
in the
future, as a replacement for wheat, corn and other crops under threat due to
climate change.
Um, because global
climate change mitigation causes real harm now to
prevent imagined harm
in the
future.
Like my post on how many greenhouse gasses humanity can safely emit and my post on the (absent) long - term
future of the fossil fuel industry, it highlights how
preventing catastrophic
climate change obliges humanity to keep a significant proportion of all available fossil fuels
in the ground.
This can lead to a built -
in assumption that the
future will repeat the past — something that does not match - up with either
preventing climate change or adapting to it.
«Humans are too stupid to
prevent climate change...», ``... a virus called Homo sapiens...», «Homo rapiens is only one of very many species, and not obiously worth preserving», are not statements about something that is going to happen
in the
future; they are statements about the moral value of humanity.
NCSE isn't composed of scientists or science teachers; it's an activist group devoted,
in part, to expounding global warming alarmists» dogma: Humans are causing
climate change; the results will be catastrophic; and governments must force people to use less energy and live simpler to
prevent future disasters.
How about this question: How many American jobs are you willing to sacrifice now
in an attempt to
prevent what is still an unknown amount of
climate change in the
future?
• The readiness of the nation to predict and avoid public and occupational health problems caused by heat waves and severe storms • Characterization and quantification of relationships between
climate variability, health outcomes, and the main determinants of vulnerability within and between populations • Development of reliable methods to connect
climate - related
changes in food systems and water supplies to health under different conditions • Prediction of
future risks
in response to
climate change scenarios and of reductions
in the baseline level of morbidity, mortality, or vulnerability • Identification of the available resources, limitations of, and potential actions by the current U.S. health care system to
prevent, prepare for, and respond to
climate - related health hazards and to build adaptive capacity among vulnerable segments of the U.S. population
For example, first work on
preventing catastrophic
climate change, and use the research from that to address the more general problem of getting shaved monkeys to worry about threats they can't see that will kill them
in the impossibly far distant
future (viz, later than next fiscal quarter).
This is so because
in addition to the theological reasons given by Pope Francis recently: (a) it is a problem mostly caused by some nations and people emitting high - levels of greenhouse gases (ghg)
in one part of the world who are harming or threatening tens of millions of living people and countless numbers of
future generations throughout the world who include some of the world's poorest people who have done little to cause the problem, (b) the harms to many of the world's most vulnerable victims of
climate change are potentially catastrophic, (c) many people most at risk from
climate change often can't protect themselves by petitioning their governments; their best hope is that those causing the problem will see that justice requires them to greatly lower their ghg emissions, (d) to protect the world's most vulnerable people nations must limit their ghg emissions to levels that constitute their fair share of safe global emissions, and, (e)
climate change is
preventing some people from enjoying the most basic human rights including rights to life and security among others.
This is so because: (a) it is a problem mostly caused by some nations and people emitting high - levels of greenhouse gases (ghg)
in one part of the world who are harming or threatening tens of millions of living people and countless numbers of
future generations throughout the world who include some of the world's poorest people who have done little to cause the problem, (b) the harms to many of the world's most vulnerable victims of
climate change are potentially catastrophic, (c) many people most at risk from
climate change often can't protect themselves by petitioning their governments; their best hope is that those causing the problem will see that justice requires them to greatly lower their ghg emissions, (d) to protect the world's most vulnerable people nations must limit their ghg emissions to levels that constitute their fair share of safe global emissions, and, (e)
climate change is
preventing some people from enjoying the most basic human rights including rights to life and security among others.
Climate change could make weather hazards more frequent and more intense but will not
prevent them from occurring
in the
future.
This idea may seem as futuristic today as the automobile did
in the 1879, but carbon removal likely will play a large role
in preventing the adverse effects of
climate change in the near
future.
However, without the scientific community providing expertise and authority
in policy prescriptions, anti-science campaigns, driven by conflicts of values (as
in evolution) to conflicts of investment and wealth (as
in climate change) subvert real scientific knowledge,
prevent the implementation of responsible policy, and put the
future of our country
in jeopardy.
When pressed by panelists on how much sea - level rise the area will confront
in the
future, Rear Admiral John White explained that we can
prevent the worst consequences if we address the root of
climate change and «stop putting CO2
in the atmosphere.»
This conference will gather representatives of Asian and Pacific countries, stakeholder groups and development and humanitarian partners to to discuss acceleration of efforts vital for the sustainable
future of the region including how to
prevent disasters and tackle
climate change while reviewing progress
in reducing disaster losses.
Limitations with
climate models have previously
prevented accurate diagnosis of
future changes in mesoscale convective systems (MCSs).
«While we are responsible for playing our part
in preventing dangerous
climate change,» says Uday Gupta, the company's Managing Director, «we also
future - proof our growth and profitability by taking
climate action
in collaboration with our partners
in the value chain.»
And, according to author and environmental activist Amy Larkin, the environmental impact of
climate change is an actual financial issue: «Would you rather federal, state, and local governments spend our money on
preventing extreme weather
in the
future or on recovering from extreme weather?