Not exact matches
Her
previous experience includes regulatory investigations into firms and individuals for misconduct, including: mis - selling; market
abuse; failures in financial crime systems and controls; failing to co-operate with the regulator; and
complaints handling.
The College took the position that the
complaint was an
abuse of process, characterizing it as an attempt by the complainant to re-litigate
previous decisions by the Registration Committee of the College, and by HPARB on review.
The
complaint against TREB was initially dismissed on April 15, 2013, but the Competition Bureau successfully appealed the case to the Federal Court of Appeal the following February, arguing the
previous committee improperly defined section 79 of the Competition Act — the «
abuse of dominance» clause.