Sentences with phrase «previous copyrighted work»

If a later work is found to be essentially the same as a previous copyrighted work, then the later work will be in violation of the copyright.

Not exact matches

Appropriation has long been a part of Kruger's work since she began to work in an agit - prop style in the 1980s, and it's worth noting here that she did not respond directly to Supreme in the early»90s, which has since collaborated with previous litigious opponents like Louis Vuitton, until they initiated a copyright claim of an image largely considered to be inspired by her.

My doubt is - > since my personal blog does contain works which have been published on the magazines and books I mentioned, I wonder if I should worry about the copyright: am I supposed to ask the permission to the previous publishers before using them for other porpuses, both personal and commercial?

«Access Copyright ‟ s tariff seeks to require payment of an unreasonable amount of royalties for the use of works well beyond its previous licenses, beyond the scope of their legitimate remit under the current law and without regard to the rights of education institutions under the Copyright Act and applicable case law.

In copyright law, the question whether one work infringes another often turns on whether the allegedly infringing work is «substantially similar» to the previous work.

Another strength of this book is that it focuses on areas that have been given short shrift in previous works on Canadian copyright: users» rights (an area of increasing importance, since most public discourse about copyright focuses on what we can't do rather than what we can); aboriginal approaches to intellectual property rights (which emphasize the protection of the honour of clans, cultures, and nations over the rights of individual creators); digital rights management (and its spectacular failure to actually protect content); and public licensing systems (such as the Creative Commons licenses).

This approach of going back to the greats of scholarship, many of them still in copyright, recalls the paperback revolution of the last century, which introduced many, with Harper Torchlight and Beacon Books in hand, to the world of learning through such reasonably priced leading scholarly works of the previous decades back to the nineteenth century.

In my previous blog post I considered one instance where a court decided that a regulatory regime effectively expropriated the copyrights in works submitted to certain federal regulatory boards.

The Entry must: i) be developed by the entrant or be fully owned by the entrant; ii) be an original work; iii) not have been previously published or be the subject of an agreement with a third party; iv) not have been considered for or won previous awards; v) not infringe upon the copyrights, trademarks, rights of privacy, rights of publicity or other intellectual property or other rights of any person or entity; and vi) have been created in a legal and safe manner.