Not exact matches
Research suggests that
previous evaluation systems did a poor job of distinguishing among levels of effectiveness and that the indicators used were not always correlated to strong instructional
practice.
This 1990 publication revisits the
previous principal preparation research and
practice from that time, including state - specific studies (Texas, Michigan and New York), program case studies (University of Utah, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, University of Texas and Texas A&M University), a study of principal
evaluation practices and the Management Profile.
In this webinar from August 23, 2017, Patty Maxfield, CEL's director of teacher
evaluation, highlights changes from the
previous version of the 5D + Rubric and explains what educators using the tool in their
practice need to keep in mind when switching to the updated rubric.
He continues to leverage his
previous experience as a research and
evaluation specialist to help others understand the meaning behind quantitative and qualitative findings and to apply those results to policy and
practice.
In addition to the broader design considerations I discussed in my
previous posts, organizations can do some specific things to reorient and tailor their
evaluation systems toward growing
practice.
Previous posts: UTLA Files Action Against District Over Teacher
Evaluations *; Teachers Union Files Two More Unfair Labor
Practice Charges *; District Urges Board to Dismiss Union's Unfair
Practice Charge