Sentences with phrase «previous rulings in the case»

Although based on Lamberth's previous rulings in the case, he seems likely to rule in favor of the plaintiffs and issue a permanent injunction, Robertson predicts that stay or a new version of it would remain in place while the decision is appealed.

Not exact matches

In previous cases recorded by the human rights organizations, citizens were denied access to plane tickets because they failed to follow a court ruling.

The memo, which was circulated to prison governors on November 26th, reads: «The criminal casework directorate (CCD) of the Border and Immigration Agency have confirmed to us that as a rule they have no interest in pursuing foreign national prisoners serving sentences of less than 12 months for deportation unless they have a court recommendation for deportation, are already subject to deportation proceedings, or (in the case of non-EEA nationals) were sentenced to less than 12 months but where the current sentence plus one or two previous sentences within the last five years (taking account of the most significant sentences during the period) total 12 months or more.»

Polling showing 81 % of public support assisted dying: http://humanism.org.uk/2012/09/07/news-1108/ Previous BHA news article — «L' waives right to anonymity in assisted dying court case: http://humanism.org.uk/2013/04/18/paul-lamb-l-waives-right-to-anonymity-in-assisted-dying-court-case/ Previous BHA news article — Court of Appeal allows «L' to join Tony Nicklinson Claim: http://humanism.org.uk/2013/03/20/court-of-appeal-allows-l-to-join-tony-nicklinson-claim/ Previous BHA news article — New case to test rules on assisted dying in UK: http://humanism.org.uk/2011/08/19/news-873/ The BHA's campaign on Assisted Dying: http://humanism.org.uk/campaigns/public-ethical-issues/assisted-dying/

In case of Poland ruling party tried to BALANCE the illegal actions of previous government.

Silver was convicted of using his political influence for political favors; the conviction was tossed last summer, when appellate judges in the 2nd Circuit ruled that the definition of «official acts» had been changed by a previous Supreme Court decision in the public corruption case of former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell.

They cited three previous cases where courts ruled such questions are «relevant and probative» when they concern a defendant's actions in the context of a securities fraud prosecution, including that of pharmaceutical executive Martin Shkreli, whom Agnifilo represented.

To the lawyers reading this article I say the following: if this interpretation does not sit well with your legal conscience, then consider that the Supreme Court has departed from its previous ruling in the previous Abu Ramadan case, as it is entitled so to do.

«Even persons who were facing criminal prosecution prior to the 2015 presidential elections who are now members of the ruling APC and other members of APC who are overtly known to be involved in known cases of corruption were excluded from the list whilst persons who have never been charged with any crime and who in fact have not held any previous government portfolio including myself were listed as «looters».

That law states that in such instances, a majority of the party's statewide candidates from the previous election (in this case there are four) must back one of the rule sets.

Previous BHA news article — New case to test rules on assisted dying in UK: http://humanism.org.uk/2011/08/19/news-873/

Money raised for K - 12 schools and community colleges would be pooled, so that low - property - wealth rural districts would get an equitable share, as required by previous court rulings in the Serrano cases.

Previous Posts: Judge in Vergara v California rules that case will go on Vergara plaintiffs file a response, asking that the case continues; In Vergara trial, legals positions are a universe aparin Vergara v California rules that case will go on Vergara plaintiffs file a response, asking that the case continues; In Vergara trial, legals positions are a universe aparIn Vergara trial, legals positions are a universe apart.

One of the most exciting and unique things about the xenosaga series is that you can look foward to seeing different character models with each new game because appearence of the characters change with each game, not because the characters have aged but for other reasons.There is one special thing that xenosaga episode three has that should have been in the other xenosaga games is the swimsuit mode because it allows you to watch movie scenes with the characters in there swimsuits but for some reason not all of the movie scenes in xenosaga 3 can be viewed in swimsuit mode, I guess it would have made the movie less serious or something.My favorite movie scenes in xenosaga are blue testament, white testament, KOSMOS verses Black Testament, any movie with Luis Virgil becaus ehe is my favorite character in the game because he's passionate and i don't think that he is a bad guy since he was able to brek free from being a testament and the only real reasons why he became a testament was because he wanted to be able to visit that old church on miltia and to gain power to prevent death.I also love Luis Virgil and all of the movie scenes that he appear in becaus they are very dramatic.The best thing about the xenosaga series is thst the story is very dee, interesting, and shocking and anyone who has played the game in order from episode one through three will definitely say the same thing.There is no doubt that anyone who has completed episode one and two will be stunned when every secret and mystery is unraveled in episode three.The one thing that I can't seem to under stand is why do some of the characters have to travel back to the earth in the end, will shion and the gang make it back to earth or will there descendants finish the mission and find earth in the end, Chaos and Nephilim told the group that the key to saving humanity lies on earth, what I want to know is what is it and how will it be used to save the universe, Even in the end new mysteries arose and remained unraveled.If there is any one outher who has has the awnswer to any of these questions please let me know when you write you're review or else there has just got to be a xenosaga four on the way, (crying) they just can't leave the story end this way.The only thing that dissapointed me about the game at first was the battle system because on the back of the case of xenosaga three said that the best aspect of the previous battles systems from episode one were combined to form a new battle system, If namco had really done this Xenosaga episode three would have had a better battle system in my opinion because I belive that the best aspect of xenosaga episode one were the special atacks wich are better than the those of episode three and the best aspect of episode three as the break system wich was also better than those of episode three.I think that namco should have given xenosaga episode 3 the battle system of episode 2 combined episode ones style of special attack, but doing this would have probably made the battle system of xenosaga episode three boring because the same old tactics would have to be used in a new game and the battle system most likely would not be as realistic as it is but it would probably be cooler.However the ability to summon all four Erde Kaisers including the new Erde Kasier Sgma my most favorite summon in the world at will and use new Ether and Tech attacks along with the new Counter and Revenge abilities gave xenosaaga episode three more than boost that it needed to have an descent battle systemThe E.S battle system of xenosaga episode 3 is way more better than those of episod one and two though, I must say that Namco really outdid themselves with the E.S battle system of xenosaga episode because the other E.S battle system from the two previos games weren't good, luckily they made up for it with the character battle system.In episode one I never really wanted to use anA.G.W.S, lucky for me they were optional but in episode two sadly it is manatory that you pilot an E.S to progress in the game in Episode three you piloting an E.S is also mandatory to progress in the game but the difference between the three episode is that will be sorry in episode three you will ge glad that you are using an E.S because their battle system is extremely cool.Xenosaga is most definitely one of the besrt RPG games in the world andit is far more better than any final fantasy game that Square Enix has ever made but for some reason it still score lower than Some Final Fantasy and other Sqare Enix games on this site.I bet that if xenosaga was actually named Final Fantasy and had a subtitle it and if it wre made by sqare Enix it would have probably been more famous and it would have scored higher even though it is still the same gameIn the end with every thing being written said and done all i can say is that I feel more at peace now that I have defended this underated game.All I have to say now is that TURN BASED GAMES RULE!

I suppose that, the Honorable Sim Lake, as a committee chair for the US Sentencing Commission, is allowing his personal allegience to the claimed «reasonableness» of the Sentencing guidelines and his personal interest in supporting his own previous ruling of «loss» in this case is getting in the way of his duty to be a judge (rather than the head of the prosecution team in this specific matter).

The First Chamber's reasoning in Pelckmans closely follows the parameters set by the Grand Chamber in previous rulings, principally: Case C - 617 / 10 Fransson — analysed in earlier posts on this Blog (1)(2).

Previous: Double jeopardy doesn't bar retrial in case of inconsistent verdicts, Supreme Court rules

There are exceptions to this rule, but in most cases judges don't care a whit about how another judge in another jurisdiction has ruled on a previous motion to compel.

The court reviewed the limited previous case law concerning incorporation by reference of contract terms, specifically cases which had confirmed that reference to the International Chamber of Commerce arbitration rules in a contract — vis - a-vis dispute resolution mechanism — was sufficient to incorporate the exclusion agreement therein (see Marine Contractors Inc v Shell Petroleum Development Co of Nigeria [1984] 2 Lloyd's Rep 77, [1984] LS Gaz R 1044).

However, in two recent preliminary rulings, the Court has had the opportunity to clarify its previous case law.

(1) where the previous decision does not reflect the values of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms; (2) where the previous decision is inconsistent with or «attenuated» by a later decision of the Court; (3) where the social, political, or economic assumptions underlying a previous decision are no longer valid in contemporary society; (4) where the previous state of law was uncertain or where a previous decision caused uncertainty; and, (5) in criminal cases, where the result of overruling a prior decision is to establish a rule favourable to the accused.

The Court, in keeping in line with previous cases, ruled that such banked sick time was in fact recoverable.

Just as in the previous week's security certificates case (where the effect of the invalidity was delayed for a year), the Court reasons its way towards a remedy in a way that at present is beyond the pale in Australia (where unlike Canada is there is no explicit constitutional recognition of the rule of law as a constitutional value).

The California Court of Appeals recently released a decision that upheld a trial court's ruling to set aside their previous dismissal of an injury case filed by a woman who was hurt in an accident involving a passenger bus that was allegedly caused by the dangerous and reckless conduct of the bus driver.

In most cases, courts will look for the seriousness of the behaviour, the willfulness of the behaviour, and the employer's corresponding behaviour, including consistent application of the rules and any previous condoning of such behaviour or conduct.

Using software made by Menlo Park startup Lex Machina, Nguyen was able to see how the judge had ruled in previous cases that matched details of hers.

CONFLICT BETWEEN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS AND EC LAW As seen in previous monthly rants, the ECJ has handed down judgments in industrial action cases giving strong preference to basic rules of EC law where they are threatened by action taken by trade unions to protect wage rates in higher - wage economies from competition from organisations from lower - wage economies using their own national labour.

Conducts research on previous court rulings as well as analyze cases to be used in particular situation

And in case you held one single job for 5 — 10 years, a good rule of thumb is to limit yourself to including 4 previous work experiences.

In Daniel v Western Australia, Justice Nicholson held that it «requires some factor for the court to otherwise order».27 The ALRC states that the «Native Title Act does not allow the court to dispense generally with the rules of evidence in native title proceedings».28 In the Wongatha case (considered in the previous chapter), Justice Lindgren noted that for Section 82 to be invoked it is: In Daniel v Western Australia, Justice Nicholson held that it «requires some factor for the court to otherwise order».27 The ALRC states that the «Native Title Act does not allow the court to dispense generally with the rules of evidence in native title proceedings».28 In the Wongatha case (considered in the previous chapter), Justice Lindgren noted that for Section 82 to be invoked it is: in native title proceedings».28 In the Wongatha case (considered in the previous chapter), Justice Lindgren noted that for Section 82 to be invoked it is: In the Wongatha case (considered in the previous chapter), Justice Lindgren noted that for Section 82 to be invoked it is: in the previous chapter), Justice Lindgren noted that for Section 82 to be invoked it is: 29

This rule was largely disregarded before the financial crisis because very few houses declined in value, but it is a major consideration today because in many cases home values are below their previous highs.