Sentences with phrase «previous thread»

"Previous thread" refers to a previous conversation or discussion that took place before the current one. It means referring back to the previous topic or continuing a previous line of thought. Full definition
We have discussed both the issues before in previous threads where you were proven wrong.
After a dozen comments by the same commenter in a thread that have basically been given in previous threads over and over.
I did not see any mention of the hardware previous threads.
This is not a reverse cherry picking by McIntyre; see previous threads about incredible disparities between the temperature record from cores taken FROM THE SAME TREES.
I haven't seen you around on previous threads here, shewonk: this month I'd particularly recommend Chief Hydrologist on decadal variability of clouds and the brilliant follow - up by Tomas Milanovic on spatio - temporal chaos.
-LSB-...] You may have already seen this... Joint Health Glucosamine Chondroitin Sulfate MSM DMSO Reply With Quote «Previous Thread Next Thread -LSB-...]
I do recall speaking up against Phil and Jon Fox who had insulted you on previous threads because they had issues with with your post on that thread.
my fault previous thread ssaid something about making a new password if you use double verification.
As I've said in previous threads, if it quacks like a duck, judges will assume it's a duck.
Ron Rosedale — Healthy Bones Me and My Diabetes Joint Health Glucosamine Chondroitin Sulfate MSM DMSO Reply With Quote «Previous Thread Next Thread -LSB-...]
Hoyden About Town has had several previous threads on Pratchett's work: Belated Friday Hoydens: The Witches of Lancre, Gratuitous Pratchett Appreciation thread: Crivens!
From what you said on previous threads I thought that the requested data was «accidentaly» posted on the FTP server after a request of someones.
I'm not as fond of repet tively cross-posting the same things to every topic I can find as you, so I simply suggest you go back and pay attention to previous threads.
as i said in the previous thread... with the minds we have we are obliged to unpick the truth from the distortion.
I know in a previous thread I said Obama was a faux intellectual, and received a partial correction from James Ceaser, but at least towards the younger Obama, I feel egg - head - ish solidarity, and resistance to the charge of pretentiousness.
Strange one isn't it — I said on a previous thread how unusual it was for Wenger to respond clearly to a specific question on a named player - «we are not looking at Vidal» — but took that to mean we are almost definitely not in for Vidal.
Did someone say in a previous thread that SAS would stick around for a half and then get blown out in the half?
There was no steel like suggested in previous thread.
judging by his previous threads where he's unable to actually stay on topic, my guess is B. though the unironic use of «snowflake» is a nod toward A. and it's a short jump from there to C.
Ken actually asked me to list some of his lies (which I did on a previous thread but I doubt he has now read them) Hope you are reading this post KEN.
Someone, in the previous thread, even suggested a narrow formation, going forward, when we have Bernadeschi, Cuadrado, Costa, Pjaca, all set for wing football.
How come in the previous thread u saw only my reply and not what warranted it?
Ken 1945, please read my reply to your «Wenger lying» question on the previous thread with «Wenger in dreamland» heading.
The doomsdayers seem out in full swing on the previous thread.
I mentioned in a previous thread that Criswell from WH was quite impressive this past season.
I notice you chose to ignore my comments on Counsel and circumcision, in a previous thread so anything to say on that.....?
Well, you called me an idiot in the previous thread, that's one comment deleted.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z