I note that humans, and indeed the majority of all species, survived
the previous warmer interglacials without thermal meltdown.
Not exact matches
Previous estimates suggested that peak temperatures during the
warmest interglacial periods — which occurred at around 125,000, 240,000 and 340,000 years ago — were about three degrees higher than they are today.
During the
previous interglacial, the Eemian, temperatures were about 2 K
warmer than now and the sea highstand was 4 — 6 meters higher than the current level, depending upon location measured.
Wilmot McCutchen (26)-- We also know that during the
previous interglacial, the Eemian, that global temperatures were about 2 K
warmer than «at present», i.e., 1950s, and during that time considerable melt occurred in Greenland (and probably some of WAIS), resulting in a 4 — 6 m sea highstand (different in different locations).
We are looking at the end of this
interglacial period based firmly upon historical cycles and norms without any acceleration when compared to
previous cycles, as that happens, more
warm would be seen as a blessing.
Why should
warming during the current Holocene
Interglacial be significantly different / less than during the
previous Eemian
Interglacial (MIS5e), when sea levels were, per the IPCC's own comments, above modern levels or for that matter above the purported mid-Holocene highstand?
The 12 — 21 cm higher sea level stand during the MWP is likely the highest sea level since the
previous interglacial period 110,000 years ago, and was produced by an extended period of
warming, allowing time for glaciers and thermal expansion to reach a climatic balance.
Individual model parameterizations were constrained by paleontological data, and the overall modeled relationship between global temperature and sea level matched well against records from four
previous warm periods: preindustrial, the last
interglacial, marine isotope stage 11, and the mid-Pliocene.
It is even accepted that
previous interglacials (the
warm periods similar to the Holocene, the period we are currently living in) were
warmer than what we experience today.
It is no longer possible for AGW ideologues to hide
previous interglacial warming, hide the decline, run from the truth, dismiss the corruption of science, and continue to lie to the people.
Ice ages have occurred in a 100,000 - year cycle for the last 700,000 years, and there have been
previous interglacials that appear to have been
warmer than the present despite lower carbon - dioxide levels.
Further, the Holocene itself was a degree
warmer, and
previous interglacial higher still — empiricial evidence would clearly suggest we are far from even a hypothetical tipping point.
Also so far it has likely been
warmer than present at other points in the Holocene, and in
previous interglacials.
Even if it has been
warmer at times during the current and
previous interglacials, showing that the forcing is unprecedented, rising and currently overwhelming natural variation can be seen of itself to be sufficient cause for alarm (that it be overwhelming is not quite what the IPCC report states but the more than half post 1950 claim is similar).
In
previous interglacials CO2 went up after it
warmed and went down as it cooled.
The world is currently in an
Interglacial, and though
warm compared to the nadir of the Ice Age approximately 20,000 - years ago, it's not as
warm as
previous Interglacials.
And in each of the
previous four or five
interglacial periods, which occur every 125,000 years, the temperature has been up to 5 degrees Celsius
warmer than it is today, and humankind can not have had anything to do with it.
In the
previous posts we learned that the Last
Interglacial, also known as the Eemian in Europe, was significantly
warmer than today in large regions of the Northern Hemisphere, and may have been around 1oC
warmer globally.
So the
previous four
interglacial periods were by 2 -3 deg C
warmer than now.
each period of
warming during the descent to the next glacial stage should be more intense than the
previous ones, as climatic variability increases outside the
warm conditions of an
interglacial climatic optimum.
Maximum temperature during the
previous interglacial was about a degree and a half
warmer than 1950.
You seem to me not be addressing the primary argument which I raised in my initial comment here: if the recent rise in CO2 is mostly the result of
warming, then the substantially
warmer previous interglacial should have produced higher CO2 levels than at present, but did not; the CO2 levels were much lower.
Somewhat related, Snyder estimates the global average temperature during the
previous interglacial (Eemian) to be
warmer than now, whereas e.g. Hansen et al (2016, under review) argue that they are similarly
warm.
However, if CO2 emissions aren't drastically reduced temperatures will get a lot
warmer over the coming centuries and even millennia than during the
previous interglacial.
The glaciations from MIS 16 onwards have been much colder, and the
interglacials from MIS 11 have been much
warmer than during the
previous 2 million years.
For example that the global temperature during the
previous interglacial was less than 1 degree
warmer than the present one.
The
previous interglacial MIS 5e was probably the
warmest preiod for about 2 million years, but the current one is also quite
warm, probably
warmer than about 97 % of the last million year.
link The four
previous interglacial periods were both shorter and
warmer than the Holocene.
Anthropogenic
warming has interrupted the Glacial -
Interglacial cycle of the Quaternary (Ganopolski et al., 2016; Haqq - Misra, 2014) and there will be no coming Ice - Age n - 1000 years from now to reseal all of this volatile Carbon, as happened at the end of each previous i
Interglacial cycle of the Quaternary (Ganopolski et al., 2016; Haqq - Misra, 2014) and there will be no coming Ice - Age n - 1000 years from now to reseal all of this volatile Carbon, as happened at the end of each
previous interglacialinterglacial.