Sentences with phrase «previously issued court»

Not exact matches

The court dispute has drawn public attention to an issue that was previously sidelined.

Schumer has previously said he believes the timing of the case will help Democrats, based on the idea that if the court upholds the law this summer it will blunt conservative objections, and if the court strikes it down, it removes the issue from the campaign.

Bronx Borough President Ruben Diaz Jr. and FreshDirect CEO Jason Ackerman issued the following statement today upon learning that the motion to renew a previously dismissed lawsuit designed to stop FreshDirect's relocation to The Bronx has been denied by the courts.

-- Fixed an issue where the 2K Cam would fail to flip in Playground games when previously playing a King of the Court game.

The court issued an order putting a previously granted injunction on hold until it decides whether to hear a full appeal on a previous lower court ruling.

The organisations have asked the Court of Appeal to reconsider the issues and order that the Government release previously secret fuel poverty documents.

Given that Mr. Singer's termination letter did not reference his bonus eligibility for that year and there were no documented performance issues, the Court held that he was entitled to a bonus payment equal to the average amount he previously received in years with similar profit.

On July 26, 2017, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) issued Opinion 1/15 (the Opinion of the Advocate General on this case had been discussed previously in this blog, part I and part II) pursuant to Article 218 (11) TFEU on the draft agreement between Canada and the European Union (EU) dealing with the Transfer of Passenger Name Record (PNR) data from the EU to Canada.

While most of the curriculum at Harvard during this time consisted of lecture and student recitation, skills development was also provided in the form of weekly moot courts, during which students argued questions of law before professors and submitted occasional written disputations on legal subjects.121 Although Stearns had previously used moot courts in his teaching at Harvard, Story and Ashmun refined them.122 Cases were handed out the week before argument, and two counsel were assigned to each side.123 The cases would then be argued the next Friday, with the other students taking notes of the argument; the professor in charge that week would issue a written opinion.124

We have previously blogged about solitary confinement in Canada and are revisiting this issue given the recent decision from the B.C. Supreme Court striking down sections of the Corrections and Conditional Release Act («CCRA») that permit prolonged and indefinite solitary confinement in federal prisons.

As I've touched on previously, that's because the damages issues (which had become rather contentious) have largely been adopted by the courts, and were subsequently removed from the bill.

Noting that the Tax Court had not previously addressed the issued of technology assisted review tools, Judge Buch concluded that the use of predictive coding in this case would provide a «happy medium» that would address both parties» concerns.

When the appellate court received the Special Action Petition, the Court of Appeals ordered both parties to file simultaneous briefs addressing whether the trial judge had jurisdiction to issue its order, since it addressed the same subject on which the superior court had previously rcourt received the Special Action Petition, the Court of Appeals ordered both parties to file simultaneous briefs addressing whether the trial judge had jurisdiction to issue its order, since it addressed the same subject on which the superior court had previously rCourt of Appeals ordered both parties to file simultaneous briefs addressing whether the trial judge had jurisdiction to issue its order, since it addressed the same subject on which the superior court had previously rcourt had previously ruled.

From Professor Doug Berman, «this grant continues the Supreme Court's wonderful recent tendency to focus on important real - world criminal justice issues that have often previously escaped its attention.»

OP has previously written about court clerks requiring bribes, and other problematical issues with judiciary in Indonesia.

Depiction releases typically contain language which not only allows a producer to make use of footage and photographs of a TV show participant, but which also specifically precludes the participant from suing the producers or broadcasters of the show for any reason — one previously unsettled issue was the extent to which such language (which is generally provided to participants on a «take it or leave it» basis) would be enforced by the courts.

In considering this issue, the court reviews previous awards for similar injuries or claims and then determines whether the award of the lower court falls within an acceptable range of verdicts previously rendered on the subject.

Although I have previously argued that the Piresferreira decision was legally wrong and, in fact, contrary to other appellate decisions including Sulz v. Canada, 2006 BCCA 582 and Queen v. Cognos, (the Supreme Court of Canada did not disturb or address the trial judge's award of $ 5,000 in damages for «emotional stress» in its decision in Queen v. Cognos Inc., [1993] 1 SCR 87,) this post will focus on a different issue: whether the decision highlights the differences to which claims of a hostile work environment can be put.

(e) In determining the proportion of caretaking functions each parent previously performed for the child under the parenting plan before relocation, the court may not consider a division of functions arising from any arrangements made after a relocation but before a modification hearing on the issues related to relocation.

In an order dated November 6, 2015, Nassau County District Court Judge Paul L. Meli, granted the ex-husband's motion to dismiss this action, concluding that small claims court lacked jurisdiction and that the matter in issue had, in any event, been previously litigCourt Judge Paul L. Meli, granted the ex-husband's motion to dismiss this action, concluding that small claims court lacked jurisdiction and that the matter in issue had, in any event, been previously litigcourt lacked jurisdiction and that the matter in issue had, in any event, been previously litigated.

2d (W.D. Wisc. 2007): The district court enjoined enforcement of the provision of Wisconsin's Code of Judicial Conduct which required judges to recuse themselves if they had, while a judge or candidate for judicial office, previously made statements that «appear [ed] to commit» the judge with respect to an issue in a proceeding.

Courts had previously been divided as to whether this meant that a party had a fixed two years from service of a claim to commence an action for contribution and indemnity, or if this could be extended due to issues of discoverability.

On April 24, 2018, the Supreme Court upheld the Constitutionality of inter partes review (IPR)(a procedure allowing private parties to challenge previously issued patent claims on t...

This is in accordance with the Supreme Court of Canada's recent pronouncement that a law previously adjudicated «may be revisited if new legal issues are raised as a consequence of significant developments in the law, or if there is a change in the circumstances or evidence that fundamentally shifts the parameters of the debate».

Since 2001 the judiciary of England and Wales has been issuing neutral citations to every decided case heard in the High Court, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court (previously House of Lords), the Judicial Committee of the...

That fairly technical legal issue was previously considered by the Court in Freeman v. United States, which had no majority opinion.

The NPC Standing Committee decision states that the SPC will issue a detailed document on the jurisdiction of the Shanghai financial court, that the financial court will hear civil, commercial and administrative financial cases previously heard by the city's intermediate court and that appeals will be to the Shanghai Higher People's Ccourt, that the financial court will hear civil, commercial and administrative financial cases previously heard by the city's intermediate court and that appeals will be to the Shanghai Higher People's Ccourt will hear civil, commercial and administrative financial cases previously heard by the city's intermediate court and that appeals will be to the Shanghai Higher People's Ccourt and that appeals will be to the Shanghai Higher People's CourtCourt.

As reported previously on Slaw by John Gregory, a protocol issued by the Superior Court of Ontario will, as of February 1, 2013, ban members of the public from using electronic devices in the courtroom unless a judge orders otherwise.

Third, the clerk had literally — with no court records access policy, redaction, sense of nuance or even awareness for the privacy issues — took previously scanned court documents and dumped them online resulting in actual fraud and identity theft.

In recent years, however, national courts have begun to venture into the international arena to take issue with the positions of their governments regarding the interpretation of treaties and to constrain what had previously been their free hand in international bargaining.

Yesterday was quite a busy opinion hand - down day for the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania: Yesterday, Pennsylvania's highest court issued a total of 18 rulings in cases that had previously been accepted for review on the meCourt of Pennsylvania: Yesterday, Pennsylvania's highest court issued a total of 18 rulings in cases that had previously been accepted for review on the mecourt issued a total of 18 rulings in cases that had previously been accepted for review on the merits.

This Court has not previously addressed any of these issues.

As discussed previously, in the Miriuwung Gagerrong case the issue of extinguishment is, for the first time presented to the court with the claimants» connection fully argued and accepted.

Both courts followed the decision issued in the Flowers case, previously summarized in The Letter of the Law.

The issue of a «nominative fair use» had not been previously addressed by the court in earlier decisions.

The Court also held that the CFPB overreached by applying its novel (and incorrect) interpretation retroactively to PHH conduct that occurred prior to the time of that interpretation, since PHH was acting in accordance with the law as previously set forth in administrative interpretations and regulations issued by HUD.