Here in Houston, over 80 % of our students rely on free or reduced
price federal school meals and it was precisely that issue of economic dependency which led to my interest in school food reform in the first place — and to the inception of this blog back in 2010.
Not exact matches
School districts have broad discretion over the use of the revenues they receive, including
federal reimbursements for free and reduced
price meals.
It could do so by requiring
school districts that charge lower
prices to increase
prices gradually so that, when combined with the
federal subsidy provided for such
meals, they eventually at least equal the
federal reimbursement level for free
meals.
Whether or not Congress chooses to increase reimbursements, the first step to providing resources for higher quality
school meals is to ensure that
federal reimbursements for free and reduced
price meals are used for their intended purpose — providing nutritious breakfasts and lunches to low - income
school children.
There is no regulatory requirement that
federal reimbursements for free and reduced
price meals be spent only on those
meals or that records differentiate between the costs and revenues of the various aspects of the
school food program.
The bad is that fewer than one in five children eligible for the program nationwide use it - 2 million a day last summer, compared with the 12 million who get free or reduced -
price meals during the
school year, according to
federal estimates.
For example, what if districts with lower property values received more
federal reimbursement dollars for
school meals than districts with higher property values, with the affluent districts making up the difference via a higher lunch
price for paying students?
The cost of complying with new
federal meal guidelines that call for more fruits and vegetables, more whole grains, and less salt, may well force cash - strapped
schools to raise the
price of lunch and breakfast.
School board officials said The Healthy, Hunger - Free Kids Act of 2010 requires them to change
pricing because the law states that
schools must charge on average no less for paid student
meals than the district receives in
federal free
meal reimbursement.
This funding can come in the form of a state reimbursement for free and reduced
price meals paid on top of the
Federal reimbursement; for example, the state of California is supposed to give
schools an extra.219 for every
meal served to a qualifying low income child (in fact, due to the ongoing budget crisis in California, that reimbursement has not always been paid for every qualifying
meal in recent years.)
For the 2015 - 16
school year, income eligibility for reduced -
price meals was 185 percent of the
federal poverty line and 130 percent for free
meals.
These include a relatively standard set of student and family demographics: an indicator for whether anyone in the family received free or reduced -
price meals at
school in the past year, the family's income as a percentage of the
federal poverty line, whether the child was born in the United States, whether the child lives with a single mother, and the highest level of education either parent has attained.
AB 1594 by Assemblyman Mike Eng, D - Monterey Park, would require charter
schools to provide each qualified, needy pupil with one nutritionally adequate free or reduced -
price meal as defined under the
federal child nutrition program regulations, each
school day.
By David McClendon and Jenny Eyer, Center for Social Measurement and Evaluation Across Texas, over 3 million low - income students qualify for free or reduced -
price school meals through federal programs such as the National School Lunch Program and the School Breakf
school meals through
federal programs such as the National
School Lunch Program and the School Breakf
School Lunch Program and the
School Breakf
School Breakfast...
With low
federal reimbursement rates for
school meals (42 cents for paid
meals, $ 2.81 for reduced -
price meals and $ 3.21 for free
meals), the added cost of healthy food gets passed on to families that can least afford it.
KIPP was founded in Houston in 1994, and has grown to 109
schools serving over 32,000 students in 20 states and Washington, D.C. Over 95 percent of students enrolled in KIPP
schools are African American or Hispanic / Latino, and more than 80 percent qualify for the
federal free and reduced -
price meals program.
This effect of including
federal funds reflects the fact that the bulk of
federal education dollars are allocated based largely on the income profile of the communities
schools serve, primarily through
federal subsidies for free and reduced
price meals and under Title I of the ESEA.19 But because subsidies for
school lunch programs are the largest source of
federal funds flowing to
schools, those concerned with equity must determine how expenditures of those non-instructional funds are considered.