Sentences with phrase «price for their legal services»

The billable hour (which shifts all the risk of unexpected developments onto the buyer) is convenient for lawyers while fixed fees (which provide welcome predictability around the final price for a legal service) are convenient for clients.

At the ACCA Annual Meeting held in October 2002, two independent surveys of in - house counsel validated the trend toward value - based pricing for legal services.

As the primary means of pricing for legal services in the consumer and small business markets, it lacks certainty and misaligns incentives for efficiency, innovation, and value.

The legal market has changed, as globalization, automation and pure common sense drive the demand for more reasonable prices for legal services.

Prices for legal services are plummeting in a free fall.

Harsh consequences for attorneys practicing here, but also potentially harmful for the public who receive assistance delivered online or from attorneys who use the cost benefits of cloud - computing to make their prices for legal services more affordable.

Providing market prices for legal services by using a tender system whereby the client is identified after first bidding round.

Not exact matches

Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.

«From the date of release of this Notice, any so - called platform that provide trading and exchange services for coin offering shall not engage in exchange businesses between legal tender and token or «virtual currency»; or engage in proprietary trading activities or trading as an central counterparty of tokens or «virtual currencies»; or provide pricing services or act as information intermediary for tokens or «virtual currencies.»»

(2) Viral Network Effects for Price Growth - because our primary market focus is on Financial Services, Banking, Legal and Investment markets, there is significant overlap between our investor base and customer base.

- Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages containing material that is obscene, racist, homophobic or sexist or that contains any form of hate speech; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages that infringe copyright; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages that are illegal, libellous, defamatory or may prejudice ongoing legal proceedings or breach a court injunction or other order; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages that are abusive, threatening or make any form of personal attack on another user or an employee of Packaging Europe magazine; - Post Messages in any language other than English; - Post the same Message, or a very similar Message, repeatedly; - Post or otherwise publish any Messages unrelated to the Forum or the Forum's topic; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages containing any form of advertising or promotion for goods and services or any chain Messages or «spam»; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages with recommendations to buy or refrain from buying a particular security or which contain confidential information of another party or which otherwise have the purpose of affecting the price or value of any security; - Disguise the origin of any Messages; - Impersonate any person or entity (including Packaging Europe magazine employees or Forum guests or hosts) or misrepresent any affiliation with any person or entity; - Post or transmit any Messages that contain software viruses, files or code designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the functionality of the Site or any computer software or equipment, or any other harmful component; - Collect or store other users» personal data; and / or - Restrict or inhibit any other user from using the Forums.

Unconscionable conduct (agrees with NFF that they have not provided protection and support reforms «to provide transparency in the supply chain» and recognise that «certain classes of suppliers... are predisposed to suffering from a special disadvantage...»; misuse of market power (legal framework must «level the balance of market power in negotiations...», «ensure transparency in the transmission of market prices» and «not allow for final market risks to be borne by the primary producer» and provide «transparency of contract processes» - specifically, Canegrowers supports effects test and a process giving ACCC greater power to «regulate anti-competitive behaviour and impose penalties», shifting «the decisions framework from the judicial system to a regulatory system» which would make it more accessible to small producers); collective bargaining (notes limits of Sugar Industry Act (Qld); authorisation and notification approval costly and limited and not a viable alternative - peak bodies should be able to «commence and progress collective bargaining with mills on behalf of their members» and current threshold too restrictive)» competitive neutrality (mixed outcomes - perverse outcomes in the case of natural monopolies - suggest remove «application of competitive neutrality provisions to natural monopoly essential services»)

The legal system often lags behind the ever - changing business practices of the digital era; Google's promotion of its own price comparison service had been going on for nearly a decade before the EU Commission's ruling.

Risks and uncertainties include without limitation the effect of competitive and economic factors, and the Company's reaction to those factors, on consumer and business buying decisions with respect to the Company's products; continued competitive pressures in the marketplace; the ability of the Company to deliver to the marketplace and stimulate customer demand for new programs, products, and technological innovations on a timely basis; the effect that product introductions and transitions, changes in product pricing or mix, and / or increases in component costs could have on the Company's gross margin; the inventory risk associated with the Company's need to order or commit to order product components in advance of customer orders; the continued availability on acceptable terms, or at all, of certain components and services essential to the Company's business currently obtained by the Company from sole or limited sources; the effect that the Company's dependency on manufacturing and logistics services provided by third parties may have on the quality, quantity or cost of products manufactured or services rendered; risks associated with the Company's international operations; the Company's reliance on third - party intellectual property and digital content; the potential impact of a finding that the Company has infringed on the intellectual property rights of others; the Company's dependency on the performance of distributors, carriers and other resellers of the Company's products; the effect that product and service quality problems could have on the Company's sales and operating profits; the continued service and availability of key executives and employees; war, terrorism, public health issues, natural disasters, and other circumstances that could disrupt supply, delivery, or demand of products; and unfavorable results of other legal proceedings.

The lower the Loan - to - Value ratio the better because it gives some protection against the risk of a decline in property or home values (prices) which can adversely affect the MIE if it has to pay for expenses associated to selling the property that has been used as collateral such as legal fees, realtor commissionsCommissions What you pay to a broker or agent for their services.

The lawyers must be in a field of public service and helping those that are underserved or unable to secure financial resources for high priced legal defenses and prosecutions.

Their customer service is fantastic; their website is user - friendly; their insurance policy is easier to understand than any other policies that I have read and it doesn't have so much incomprehensible legal jargon; their prices are very reasonable and provide the best value for your money for the coverage that you get (they were the cheapest that I could find during my research); and it is easy to make a claim on their website, purchase insurance and extend your coverage while you are still on the road.

Good healthcare, insurance, legal services and so forth can be found for reasonable prices.

There will still be a market for Cadillac legal services at Cadillac prices.

Ignition Law won the ABS award for its efforts to disrupt the legal sector by providing high quality legal services to entrepreneurs, startups and small businesses at a more affordable price.

Professional Services Management Platform, including legal project management, matter pricing, resource management and client / lawyer dashboards, for both law firms and corporate law departments.

Today, it is the client that decides the price that will be paid for legal services.

If such technology were used by CanLII, in addition to legal opinions, from its large databases of materials, other revenue - producing products would be developed for each major area of law and practice, such as: (1) a priced catalogue of the standard memoranda, which would be advertised in legal publications; (2) a service that summarizes new decisions, statutory amendments, and significant law journal articles; (3) a newsletter for each major area law and practice; and, (4) specialized databases and projects such as databases of model factums and average sentences and settlements.

The EU layer of public service regulation further adds to this complexity as it interacts in many different ways with the national legal frameworks in this field: EU law may structure national legal norms, coordinate the provision of services between the Member States, bring about minimal or maximal standards (e.g. pertaining to quality, ubiquity or affordability of the services provided), comprise detailed regulation or even set prices for the provision of public services as in the case of mobile roaming tariffs.

The market for legal services for ordinary people is fairly characterized as a market with asymmetric information as to the quality of the lawyer, the price of the services on offer and what is reasonably achievable as a result of proffered services.

If we give people the option of hiring a lawyer for just some of a legal problem instead of all of it, we let them choose the legal services they want, when they want, at a price they can afford.

As a result the CMA asked regulators of legal services to revise their regulatory requirements to set a new minimum standard for disclosures on price and service.

According to research published by the Legal Services Board (LSB) in November 2017 in Prices of Individual Consumer Legal Services 2017 only 11 % of firms currently advertise any prices for conveyancing services on their website, and although 9 % were planning to start advertising prices, 74 % had no current plans tServices Board (LSB) in November 2017 in Prices of Individual Consumer Legal Services 2017 only 11 % of firms currently advertise any prices for conveyancing services on their website, and although 9 % were planning to start advertising prices, 74 % had no current plans to Prices of Individual Consumer Legal Services 2017 only 11 % of firms currently advertise any prices for conveyancing services on their website, and although 9 % were planning to start advertising prices, 74 % had no current plans tServices 2017 only 11 % of firms currently advertise any prices for conveyancing services on their website, and although 9 % were planning to start advertising prices, 74 % had no current plans to prices for conveyancing services on their website, and although 9 % were planning to start advertising prices, 74 % had no current plans tservices on their website, and although 9 % were planning to start advertising prices, 74 % had no current plans to prices, 74 % had no current plans to do so.

«CMA Final Report: Demand for Better Price and Service Transparency from Law Firms, and Review of Legal Regulation.»

Where lawyers who do not want their jobs to depend upon on billing a high number of hours would not need to bill a high number of hours: Under a corporate structure, there would be no «leveraged pyramid» for partner compensation, fixed prices would be determined by professionals skilled in the pricing of legal services, and the lawyers» jobs would depend upon their productivity.

Further, both types of populations — those who can pay nothing and those who can pay something within limits — also struggle to access legal services for reasons not directly related to price.

Some of our services remain eligible for legal aid; those that are not are provided at a fixed price, so people need not fear the uncertainty of not knowing what the service will cost them...; We offer modular [unbundled] services, so that we can put together bespoke packages that suit everyone's pocket; We offer extended services by phone and email, so that people who do not want to come into an office don't need to (whether it's because they are simply busy or because they've been subjected to violence and prefer to remain in a place where they know they are safe); We offer flexible hours, including evenings and weekends; We demystify law by talking to clients in plain English...

For example, a casual perusal of the online legal research service Westlaw reveals that «mumbo jumbo» appears at least 251 times in judicial opinions.8 «Jibber - jabber» shows up just seven times (although surprisingly used by parties, rather than in statements from the court), while the more prosaic «gobbledygook» has 126 hits in the legal database.9 Believed to have been coined in 1944 by U.S. Rep. Maury Maverick of Texas, «gobbledygook» has been used by everyone from political figures referring to bureaucratic doublespeak (for example, President Ronald Reagan's stinging 1985 indictment of tax law revisions as «cluttered with gobbledygook and loopholes designed for those with the power and influence to have high - priced legal and tax advisers») to judges decrying the indecipherable arguments and pleadings of the lawyers practicing before thFor example, a casual perusal of the online legal research service Westlaw reveals that «mumbo jumbo» appears at least 251 times in judicial opinions.8 «Jibber - jabber» shows up just seven times (although surprisingly used by parties, rather than in statements from the court), while the more prosaic «gobbledygook» has 126 hits in the legal database.9 Believed to have been coined in 1944 by U.S. Rep. Maury Maverick of Texas, «gobbledygook» has been used by everyone from political figures referring to bureaucratic doublespeak (for example, President Ronald Reagan's stinging 1985 indictment of tax law revisions as «cluttered with gobbledygook and loopholes designed for those with the power and influence to have high - priced legal and tax advisers») to judges decrying the indecipherable arguments and pleadings of the lawyers practicing before thfor example, President Ronald Reagan's stinging 1985 indictment of tax law revisions as «cluttered with gobbledygook and loopholes designed for those with the power and influence to have high - priced legal and tax advisers») to judges decrying the indecipherable arguments and pleadings of the lawyers practicing before thfor those with the power and influence to have high - priced legal and tax advisers») to judges decrying the indecipherable arguments and pleadings of the lawyers practicing before them.

Under such a system, the public could hire a person intimately familiar with the legal marketplace, to help them analyze the type of legal service they need and find the best lawyer for the job, at the best price.

According to a recent story in MedCity News, Cleveland - based Ghannoum identified a need for high - quality, competitively priced legal services for new bio-tech companies.

Making the decision to hire a virtual worker or pay for legal process outsourcing can be as simple as hiring an independent contractor fresh out of law school to do easy tasks, but if you are serious about using virtual workers on a larger scale in your firm and really getting the most out of it, it is important be aware of ethics considerations; price benefits and initial investments; and intangible benefits and costs when weighing the options of paying for a full - time staff, hiring on - site independent contractors, using outsourced service providers or juggling all of the work on your own.

The total return on investment, both tangible and intangible, in artificial intelligence might be higher for small and midsize firms, because of its ability to help these firms remain competitive and profitable, especially in the retail sector of the legal services industry and in price - sensitive practice areas.

The demand for value - based billing presents law firms with opportunities to propose various pricing models for their legal services.

Trends are showing consumers of legal services are starting to look for fixed or capped fee structures, are wanting more value at a lower price, and are not necessarily looking to traditional legal resources for legal services, they're going to innovative professional service firms that offer a wider range of options.

The cost of paying the annual premium versus the prospect of no insurance for a claim arising out of legal services (beyond the permitted exceptions) provided while on exemption, is a small price to pay.

A key message in the Co-op's move into legal services is expected to be a low - price, fixed - fee tariff for family work.

If clients will no longer pay for more than the value that they derive from legal services, and as competition on price continues to intensify, lawyers will be forced to control their costs and seek innovative ways in which to service their clients.

While billable hour pricing is the «norm» for legal services, you will find that our rates are very competitive.

Voted Most Innovative Law Firm in Canada 2015 and 2016, Legal Logik offers legal services for the modern era with fixed - pricing, innovative online service packages and an expert team of industry - leading attorLegal Logik offers legal services for the modern era with fixed - pricing, innovative online service packages and an expert team of industry - leading attorlegal services for the modern era with fixed - pricing, innovative online service packages and an expert team of industry - leading attorneys.

Doug Woods) + Developing Metrics for Pricing New Work (panel) + The Influence of Procurement on Legal Services (panel incl.

Attorneys that you solicit for legal services may provide certain information regarding legal practice areas, pricing, and experience on their profiles.

For more information about our services, browse the Legal Project Management, Corporate Legal Spending, Pricing & Profitability and Data Analytics sections.

Forrest is dedicated to increasing access to legal services for people of all economic backgrounds, which he works toward by offering several flexible pricing models.

We provide low cost legal services for clients unable to afford full priced attorneys.

A survey released yesterday on the business of law and legal technology finds that competition for legal services remains high, demand remains relatively flat, and law firms are feeling pressure to lower prices and enhance operational efficiency.