Sentences with phrase «price lunch under»

KIPP alumni are predominantly low - income students of color, the network says: 95 percent are African - American or Latino and nearly 90 percent qualify for free or reduced - price lunch under federal poverty guidelines.

The percentage of students eligible for a free or reduced price lunch under the National School Lunch Act enrolled at all schools currently operated by the operator exceeds 70 percent;

Not exact matches

From Saturday, September 5 through Monday, September 7, Fogo is offering a free lunch or dinner for children 12 and under with the purchase of an adult full priced churrasco lunch, dinner, Market Table or entrée *.

The diner offers great value with most dishes priced under $ 15, and each location is designed to make guests feel at home while enjoying all - day breakfast, lunch and dinner.

The bottom line facts you need to know: under the new school food law passed last year, school districts must bring the price for a paid lunch (that is, a lunch purchased by a student who does not qualify for free or reduced price meals) into line with what the meal actually costs, eventually charging an average of $ 2.46 per lunch.

The survey sought to identify issues and successful practices in «inclusive» STEM schools — schools that serve students from groups historically under - represented in STEM fields and with a higher percentage of students who qualify for a free or reduced - price lunch (which is linked to family income)-- as opposed to «selective» STEM schools, which recruit students who have higher levels of prior achievement.

For the vast majority of public schools, approval to receive free and / or reduced - price lunches (FRPL) has been the sole, or at least the primary, indicator of low family income under Title I.

The options allowed under the USED guidance include using counts of Identified Students (either alone, or multiplied by 1.6 to approximate the number of children who would be approved for free and reduced - price lunches); counts of students from low - income families based on state or local income surveys; and Medicaid, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) assistance, Census (where available), or composite data authorized under the ESEA statute.

Under a law passed in 2010, districts with free or reduced - price lunches can offer the meals to every student at the school, regardless of household income.

In the document ABHS announced our policy for providing free and reduced price meals for children under the National school Lunch Program.

Utah local educational agencies (that is, district and charter schools or LEAs) today announced their policy for free and reduced - price meals and free milk for children unable to pay the full price of meals / milk served under the National School Lunch, School Breakfast, After School Snack, and / or Special Milk programs.

SALT LAKE CITY — Utah local educational agencies (that is, district and charter schools or LEAs) today announced their policy for free and reduced - price meals and free milk for children unable to pay the full price of meals / milk served under the National School Lunch, School Breakfast, After School Snack, and / or Special Milk programs.

The federal government provides reimbursement for free, reduced - price and paid lunches and breakfasts under the National School Lunch Program.

Using data from the 2012 - 2013 school year, the study determined that 51 percent of all students in pre-kindergarten through 12th grade were eligible under the federal program for free and reduced - price lunch, a standard measure of the number of children living in poverty.

For a district qualifying under this paragraph whose charter school tuition payments exceed 9 per cent of the school district's net school spending, the board shall only approve an application for the establishment of a commonwealth charter school if an applicant, or a provider with which an applicant proposes to contract, has a record of operating at least 1 school or similar program that demonstrates academic success and organizational viability and serves student populations similar to those the proposed school seeks to serve, from the following categories of students, those: (i) eligible for free lunch; (ii) eligible for reduced price lunch; (iii) that require special education; (iv) limited English - proficient of similar language proficiency level as measured by the Massachusetts English Proficiency Assessment examination; (v) sub-proficient, which shall mean students who have scored in the «needs improvement», «warning» or «failing» categories on the mathematics or English language arts exams of the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System for 2 of the past 3 years or as defined by the department using a similar measurement; (vi) who are designated as at risk of dropping out of school based on predictors determined by the department; (vii) who have dropped out of school; or (viii) other at - risk students who should be targeted to eliminate achievement gaps among different groups of students.

This effect of including federal funds reflects the fact that the bulk of federal education dollars are allocated based largely on the income profile of the communities schools serve, primarily through federal subsidies for free and reduced price meals and under Title I of the ESEA.19 But because subsidies for school lunch programs are the largest source of federal funds flowing to schools, those concerned with equity must determine how expenditures of those non-instructional funds are considered.

The maps illustrate under - enrollment, free or reduced - price lunch rates, and school performance as captured by the Academic Performance Index.

Two options were explored for reaching parents with the program: Chapter I pilot schools (schools which qualify for federal funds based on economic and achievement criteria, e.g. those which serve a high number of free or reduced - price lunches and also have a large number of children under - achieving on group tests), and adult education programs.