Until the governments properly price carbon pollution it is left to climate concerned citizens to try anything they can to impose pollution
pricing on carbon fuels.
Not exact matches
Starting in 2017, Alberta will apply a $ 20 - a-tonne
price on carbon emissions that will cover about 90 per cent of the economy, including essentials such as gasoline and home heating
fuel.
Or maybe she was concerned that mentioning lower
prices for
carbon fossil
fuels would undermine her arguments
on the environment.
However, the Pan Canadian Framework
on Clean Growth and Climate Change lays out a number of policies that will compel more clean tech innovation in Canada, he said, including a
price on pollution with a
carbon price, to be in place across Canada by the start of next year, as well as a promised national clean
fuels strategy, better energy efficiency standards and limits
on greenhouse gases like methane.
«Building
on Ottawa's earlier commitments to set a national
carbon price, establish a clean
fuel standard and to phase out traditional coal power, these measures will help Canada make the transition from fossil
fuels to clean energy.
The logic behind
carbon pricing — most likely either a tax
on fossil
fuels or a cap - and - trade system that allows companies to sell emission permits back and forth — is powerful.
Canada's coming national
price on carbon adds further
fuel to the debate, as some will be looking for Canadian industries affected by the
carbon price to get protections, maybe even in the form of a
carbon tax applied at the border
on goods coming from places in the U.S. where there is no such policy.
Exhibit A is a
price on carbon, a foundational policy that rewards clean innovation and curbs demand for fossil
fuels.
The conclusions are based
on a model accounting for
fuel prices, GHG allowances and the payback period of technologies such as combined heat and power and
carbon capture and storage.
Further steps could include pushing for more renewable energy; an aggressive cut in the use of coal and natural gas to make electricity; wider use of electric cars, biofuel, and hydrogen
fuel; changes in farming practices; and putting a
price on carbon pollution.
The 72 - year - old has also been arrested five times in protests against the continued burning of fossil
fuels or to demand that the United States put a
price on carbon emissions.
«Maybe we can have the best of both worlds: a
price on carbon to create an innovative environment for clean technology in California and keep businesses within state lines and not cause an adverse impact
on consumers through radically higher
prices for transportation
fuels or electricity.»
We urge Congress to set a cap
on fossil -
fuel production before Copenhagen, phase in a
price on carbon at its source and send the proceeds back to the taxpayer.
«What we find is that sustained low or high oil
prices could have a major impact
on the global energy system over the next several decades; and depending
on how the
fuel substitution dynamics play out, the
carbon dioxide consequences could be significant.»
$ 8 billion) over first ten years for deficit reductionObeys PAYGO; Starting in 2026, 25 % of auction revenues for deficit reductionFuels and TransportationIncrease biofuels to 60 million gallons by 2030, low -
carbon fuel standard of 10 % by 2010, 1 million plug» in hybrid cars by 2025, raise
fuel economy standards, smart growth funding, end oil subsidies, promote natural gas drilling, enhanced oil recoverySmart growth funding, plug - in hybrids, raise
fuel economy standards $ 7 billion a year for smart growth funding, plug - in hybrids, natural gas vehicles, raise
fuel economy standards; offshore drilling with revenue sharing and oil spill veto, natural gas fracking disclosureCost ContainmentInternational offsetsOffset pool, banking and borrowing flexibility, soft
price collar using permit reserve auction at $ 28 per ton going to 60 % above three - year - average market
price» Hard»
price collar between $ 12 and $ 25 per ton, floor increases at 3 % + CPI, ceiling at 5 % + CPI, plus permit reserve auction, offsets like W - MClean Air Act And StatesNot discussedOnly polluters above 25,000 tons of
carbon dioxide equivalent a year, regional cap and trade suspended until 2017, EPA to set stationary source performance standards in 2016, some Clean Air Act provisions excludedOnly polluters above 25,000 tons of
carbon dioxide equivalent a year, regional cap and trade pre-empted, establishes coal - fired plant performance standards, some Clean Air Act provisions excludedInternational CompetitivenessTax incentives for domestic auto industryFree allowances for trade - exposed industries, 2020
carbon tariff
on importsCarbon tariff
on importsReferences: Barack Obama, 2007; Barack Obama, 8/3/08; Pew Center, 6/26/09; leaked drafts of American Power Act, 5/11/10.
These fossil
fuels are subject to a «
carbon price support rate» based
on carbon content which will create in essence a
carbon price floor.
«We won't see a significant shift away from fossil
fuels in the energy industry until an honest
price is imposed
on carbon - dioxide emissions.»
carbon price floor tax: a tax
on fossil
fuels used in electricity generation.
Calling fossil
fuels an antiquated technology, like whale oil, Mann points out that alternative energy is growing even without subsidies or a
price on carbon.
Putting a
price on pollution can incentivise the phase - out of fossil
fuels, but the existing
carbon markets have so far not delivered a high enough
price to drive the transition to...
A couple of years later, after the industry was turned upside down by soaring oil
prices and economic turmoil, governments began mandating tough new limits
on fuel economy and
carbon - dioxide emissions.
On one hand, the downturn may give policymakers the incentive to obscure the costs of climate regulation, leading to the adoption of a patchwork of regulatory requirements, a low carbon fuel mandate, a renewable portfolio standard, and other measures that would be significantly more costly than a simple price on carbo
On one hand, the downturn may give policymakers the incentive to obscure the costs of climate regulation, leading to the adoption of a patchwork of regulatory requirements, a low
carbon fuel mandate, a renewable portfolio standard, and other measures that would be significantly more costly than a simple
price on carbo
on carbon.
Let's pay tribute to Gary's exemplary life: We can address climate change by working to get a
price on carbon, which will reduce fossil
fuel consumption and promote renewables.
By the 2040s, the Blueprints world sees renewable energy technologies compete
on price against fossil
fuels, which are well managed with
carbon capture and storage.
In the long run I don't think we will succeed in getting transportation of oil by trying to stop oil production
on a site - by - site basis, we are going to have to put a high
price on transportation
fuels that have high
carbon emissions and get much more serious about driving energy innovation they can get the transportation system off
carbon.
A
carbon tax will make fossil
fuel prices come closer to covering full cost, incorporating some of those
fuels» currently - excluded costs: our dependence
on and enrichment of oil - country despots, huge military costs of protecting distant oil operations and transport, health costs from emissions other than CO2, etc., etc., etc.....
The other thing not mentioned above is that the most fundamental problem, which I keep repeating, is this: as long as fossil
fuels are the cheapest energy, somebody will keep burning them — implication, we must put a rising
price on carbon.
But it is also clear that, absent a
price on carbon emissions, as the
price of energy rises, the amount of economically extractable fossil
fuels increases, including unconventional fossil
fuels.
One hazard is that the
price of
carbon could suddenly plummet — as it did in the European system in 2006 because of a glut of credits
on the markets — prompting a swift return to burning more fossil
fuels.
We need to maintain that downward trend by imposing a substantial
carbon tax
on motor
fuels, which would keep the
price up and the demand down.
-- Put a sufficiently high
price on carbon and deliver the G - 20 commitment to phase out fossil
fuel subsidies, using these funds to contribute to the several hundred billion US dollars per year needed to scale up investments in renewable energy.
To achieve these goals, the report recommended that the federal government implement a nationwide
price on carbon and eliminate subsidies to Canada's fossil
fuel industry — particularly, its tar sands industry.
Companies that rely
on producing biofuels and / or synthetic hydrocarbon
fuels as a pathway to
carbon removal will face increasing economic challenges with low oil
prices.
Did you know that many states are talking about putting a
price on carbon emissions from fossil
fuels?
Even a Congress controlled by Democrats will not put a
price on carbon, so the Executive Branch has no other practical choice but to use the legal authority it already has in its hands via the Clean Air Act if it wants to get the job done of raising
carbon fuel prices and constraining
carbon fuel supplies.
Now is the time to cut fossil
fuel subsidies and implement a
carbon tax, it argues, as the low oil
price reduces the policies» effect
on consumers.
Because energy
prices affect every single America, everyone has a stake in the issue of whether the government imposes additional restrictions
on fossil -
fuel use, including
carbon pricing schemes such as those proposed by PRG.
A steadily rising fee
on the production of fossil
fuels based
on the
carbon emissions that will be released when they are burned will raise the
price of fossil
fuels, not all energy options.
A
price on carbon would go a long way to making clean energy sources cost - competitive with traditional
fuels, but it is not the only policy tool necessary to reduce
carbon emissions.
There was some bad news for Drax recently as the UK government decided that biomass subsidies would not keep climbing as the «
carbon price floor» — levied
on fossil
fuel production (and due to rise further)--
on electricity consumption has caused a backlash from manufacturers, consumer groups and energy suppliers who are concerned that the «tax will push up
prices, make the UK uncompetitive and force the premature closure of coal - fired power plants, increasing the risk of blackouts.»
With the recent steep fall in oil
prices and associated declines in other energy
prices, the stars are aligned for adopting a
carbon tax
on consumption of fossil
fuels, Lawrence Summers, a former treasury secretary and presidential adviser, says in the Washington Post.
Generally speaking, environmentalists support the idea of putting a
price on carbon because it would help account for the harmful effects of
carbon emissions
on the climate and encourage the economy to shift away from fossil
fuels.
But if the industry wants to surpass coal and fulfil its role as a «transition
fuel», it should lobby for a
carbon price to help it
on its way.
«The side event shed light
on actions taken by different countries regarding
carbon pricing and fossil
fuel subsidy reform measures and tools, and how such efforts need to be further reinforced to address fossil
fuel subsidies.»
It is impossible to reach the President's highly ambitious goals within the relatively short timeframes he desires unless the US Government puts a stiff
price on carbon and unless it takes a series of coordinated actions which have the effect of directly or indirectly limiting the supply, availability, and consumption of all
carbon fuels.
Even with the Guardian's welcome campaign, the world still needs a transparent
price on carbon pollution to strangle demand for fossil
fuels by replacing them with non-
carbon alternatives.
Putting a
price on pollution can incentivise the phase - out of fossil
fuels, but the existing
carbon markets have so far not delivered a high enough
price to drive the transition to...
Republicans generally argue that a
carbon tax would hurt the economy by boosting energy
prices on fossil
fuels, but some conservatives have supported the idea as a way to offset lower personal taxes.
For energy specifically, full - cost
pricing means putting a tax
on carbon to reflect the full cost of burning fossil
fuels and offsetting it with a reduction in the tax
on income.
The most straightforward form of
carbon pricing is a
carbon tax, which, in its simplest version, imposes a fee
on every ton of
carbon that enters the economy («upstream,»
on fossil
fuel producers and importers, as opposed to «downstream,»
on fossil
fuel consumers).